scholarly journals A Study of How Urology Out-Patients like to Receive Clinical Information

2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 579-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
DN Wood ◽  
A Deshpande ◽  
M Wijewardena ◽  
SS Gujral
Keyword(s):  
General Practitioners ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Postal Questionnaire ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
The Future ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Uk ◽  
To Receive ◽  
B 52

INTRODUCTION As part of the NHS Plan the UK Department of Health has suggested that both patients and general practitioners (GPs) are written to following hospital consultations. We audited the responses of patients and GPs to this practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 160 patients in one consultant urologist's clinic were included. The consultant had never routinely copied GP letters to patients. The SpR in the same clinic had routinely done so in previous posts. Patients who had received letters (group A) and those who had not (group B) were asked to complete a postal questionnaire. GPs were also sent a questionnaire to assess their opinion. The responses were analysed. RESULTS Questionnaires were sent out to patients (80 to group A and 80 to group B. From this, 100 (62.5%) responses were received (A 48 [60%]; B 52 [65%]). Of respondents, 81% were male. Overall, 98% of those patients who received a letter agreed with its contents, and stated they would keep the letter and take it to a subsequent doctor's appointment. Of respondents, 83% (A) and 96% (B) had never received a doctor's letter before but 83% (40 [83%, A], 43 [83%, B]; P > 0.05) of respondents would like to receive doctors' letters in the future. some 22 GP practices received and completed questionnaires at a PCT meeting and 74% of GPs agreed with the practice of copying patients their letters. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest that patients should be offered a copy of their letter and that their response should be documented in the notes. This may serve to improve communication with the patient but should not be undertaken without their agreement.

Radiofrequency ablation for markedly incompetent perforators versus compression therapy in the management of post-phelebtic venous ulcers: A randomized controlled trial

Vascular ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 170853812110100
Author(s):  
Mohamed Shukri Abdelgawad ◽  
Amr M El-Shafei ◽  
Hesham A Sharaf El-Din ◽  
Ehab M Saad ◽  
Tamer A Khafagy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Compression Therapy ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Venous Ulcers ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
To Receive

Background Venus ulcers developed mainly due to reflux of incompetent venous valves in perforating veins. Patients and methods In this randomized controlled trial, 119 patients recruited over two years, with post-phelebtic venous leg ulcers, were randomly assigned into one of two groups: either to receive radiofrequency ablation of markedly incompetent perforators (Group A, n = 62 patients) or to receive conventional compression therapy (Group B, n = 57 patients). Follow-up duration required for ulcer healing continued for 24 months post randomization. Results Statistically significant shorter time to healing (ulcer complete healing or satisfactory clinical improvement) between both groups (56 patients, 90.3% of cases in Group A versus 44 patients 77.2% of cases in Group B) over the follow-up period of 24 months was attained ( p  = 0.001). Also, significantly different ulcer recurrence was recorded between both groups, 8 patients (12.9%) in Group A versus 19 patients (33.3%) in Group B ( p = 0.004). Conclusion In absence of deep venous obstruction, the monopolar radiofrequency ablation for incompetent perforators is a feasible and effective method that surpasses the traditional compression protocol for incompetent perforator-induced venous ulcers in terms of time required for healing even in the presence of unresolved deep venous valvular reflux.

Comparison of stent related symptoms in patients taking mirabegron, solifenacin, or tamsulosin: A double blinded randomized clinical trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 039156032110481
Author(s):  
Abhishek Chandna ◽  
Santosh Kumar ◽  
Kalpesh M Parmar ◽  
Aditya P Sharma ◽  
Sudheer K Devana ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Health ◽  
Bodily Pain ◽  
Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy ◽  
Health Indices ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Robotic Pyeloplasty ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Double Blinded ◽  
To Receive

Background: The present study aims to assess the efficacy of mirabegron, a novel beta-3 agonist for ameliorating stent related symptoms (SRSs) as compared to tamsulosin and solifenacin. Methods: Total of 150 patients undergoing ureteral stent placement following ureteroscopic lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, or laparoscopic/robotic pyeloplasty were randomized in 1:1:1 fashion to receive mirabegron 50 mg (group A), solifenacin 5 mg (group B), and tamsulosin 0.4 mg (group C) OD respectively. Patients were followed at POD10 (I visit), 4 weeks (II visit) after surgery, and 2 weeks post-stent removal. Validated vernacular version of ureteric stent symptoms questionnaire (USSQ) was administered to the patients at each visit. Results: Out of 150 patients randomized, 123 patients (A; n = 41, B; n = 40, and C; n = 42) completed the study. The groups were comparable in terms of urinary index score of USSQ at I and II visits ( p = 0.119 and 0.076, respectively). A lower proportion of patients in group B experiencing bodily pain at II visit ( p = 0.039), however, pain scores were comparable. Significantly lower general health index scores were observed in group A at I visit and over 4 weeks ( p = 0.007). No significant differences were observed in other domains of USSQ. Age, sex, and surgical procedure undertaken did not significantly impact the scores in various USSQ domains. Conclusion: Mirabegron demonstrates comparable benefit in alleviating SRSs with better general health indices and may be an effective alternative for SRSs, especially when tamsulosin or solifenacin are contra-indicated or poorly tolerated.

scholarly journals Correlation between angiographic transit times and neurological status on admission in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 1093-1099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Ivanov ◽  
Andreas Linninger ◽  
Chih-Yang Hsu ◽  
Sepideh Amin-Hanjani ◽  
Victor A. Aletich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Cerebral Artery ◽  
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Angiography Suite ◽  
Transit Times ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

OBJECT The use of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for semiquantitative cerebral blood flow(CBF) assessment is a new technique. The aim of this study was to determine whether patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) with higher Hunt and Hess grades also had higher angiographic contrast transit times (TTs) than patients with lower grades. METHODS A cohort of 30 patients with aSAH and 10 patients without aSAH was included. Relevant clinical information was collected. A method to measure DSA TTs by color-coding reconstructions from DSA contrast-intensity images was applied. Regions of interest (ROIs) were chosen over major cerebral vessels. The estimated TTs included time-to-peak from 0% to 100% (TTP0–100), TTP from 25% to 100% (TTP25–100), and TT from 100% to 10% (TT100–10) contrast intensities. Statistical analysis was used to compare TTs between Group A (Hunt and Hess Grade I-II), Group B (Hunt and Hess Grade III-IV), and the control group. The correlation coefficient was calculated between different ROIs in aSAH groups. RESULTS There was no difference in demographic factors between Group A (n = 10), Group B (n = 20), and the control group (n = 10). There was a strong correlation in all TTs between ROIs in the middle cerebral artery (M1, M2) and anterior cerebral artery (A1, A2). There was a statistically significant difference between Groups A and B in all TT parameters for ROIs. TT100–10 values in the control group were significantly lower than the values in Group B. CONCLUSIONS The DSA TTs showed significant correlation with Hunt and Hess grades. TT delays appear to be independent of increased intracranial pressure and may be an indicator of decreased CBF in patients with a higher Hunt and Hess grade. This method may serve as an indirect technique to assess relative CBF in the angiography suite.

scholarly journals A Double-Blind Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Ondansetron with Droperidol in the Prevention of Emesis following Strabismus Surgery

1995 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 438-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Davis ◽  
S. Krige ◽  
D. Moyes
Keyword(s):  
Recovery Time ◽  
Strabismus Surgery ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Oral Fluids ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Mean Time

A prospective double-blind study was conducted to compare the anti-emetic efficacy of ondansetron and droperidol in preventing postoperative emesis following strabismus surgery. A sample size of 213 patients was divided into three equal groups to receive ondansetron 150 μg/kg (Group A), ondansetron 75 μg/kg (Group B), or droperidol 75 fig/kg (Group C). All patients received a standardized anaesthetic technique. All episodes of emesis, recovery time, and time to tolerating oral fluids were recorded. The incidence of emesis during 24 hours was Groups A and B 19.7%, and Group C 28.2%. The lower incidence of emesis recorded by the ondansetron groups compared with the droperidol group was not statistically significant. Ondansetron at 75 μg/kg was as effective as 150 μg/kg in reducing emesis when compared with droperidol. Mean time to discharge from the recovery room was 75.3 minutes (Group A), 44.4 minutes (Group B), and 41.0 minutes (Group C). The mean time to tolerating oral fluids was 356.5 minutes (Group A), 402.8 minutes (Group B), and 378.1 minutes (Group C). There was no statistical difference in discharge times from recovery or time to tolerating oral fluids in any of the three groups.

scholarly journals Management of Pain During Propofol Injection Using Intravenous Nitroglycerine

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-205
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sazzad Hossain ◽  
Mohammad Mamunur Rashid ◽  
Md Anisur Rahman Babu ◽  
Afsana Sultana ◽  
Md Sirajul Islam Mahfuz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Placebo Group ◽  
Venous Occlusion ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Injection Pain ◽  
Group A ◽  
American Society ◽  
Group B ◽  
Double Blinded ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists ◽  
To Receive

Background: Propofol is an intravenous (IV) anesthetic agent, can irritate the skin, mucous membrane and venous intima. The main drawback is the pain at injection site following its intravenous injection. Objectives: This study was performed to evaluate the effect of intravenous nitroglycerine on pain in patients following propofol injection. Materials and Methods: Eighty adult patients of both sexes, aged 20-50 years, according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status were divided into two equal groups (n=40) to receive 200 mcg intravenous nitroglycerine diluted in 10 ml saline (group A) and 10 ml normal saline as placebo (group B) at an ambient operating room temperature in a randomized and double blinded fashion to compare the pain-relieving effects of the drugs during propofol injection before the patients lost consciousness. The pain on propofol injection was assessed according to the Mc Crirrick and Hunter scale. Results: The overall incidence and severity of pain were significantly less in Groups A (nitroglycerine group) than group B (placebo group) (p< 0.05). The incidence of mild and moderate pain in Group A versus group B was 25% vs 45% and 15% vs 30% respectively (p<0.05). The incidence of score '0' (no pain) was higher in Group A (60%) than Group B (25%) (p<0.05). Conclusion: Pretreatment with 200 mcg nitroglycerine with venous occlusion for one minute is effective pretreatment in alleviating propofol injection pain when compared to placebo. KYAMC Journal Vol. 10, No.-4, January 2020, Page 202-205

scholarly journals Randomised trial of mefenamic acid versus tranexamic acid in management of menorrhagia

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 4608
Author(s):  
Madhu J. ◽  
Shylaja A. S.
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Mefenamic Acid ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Menstrual Blood ◽  
Menstrual Blood Loss ◽  
Loss Assessment ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
To Receive

Background: The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of mefenamic acid, a non-inflammatory drug with tranexamic acid, an antifibrinolytic drug in management of menorrhaghia.Methods: Randomised trial of women attending outpatient department of St. Philomena’s hospital, Bangalore with complaints of menorrhagia. Fifty four patients with complaints of menorrhagia were randomly assigned to receive either mefenamic acid 500 mg tid (group A- 24 patients) or tranexamic acid 1 gm TID (group B- 26 patients) from day one to day five for three consecutive menstrual cycles.Results: Reduction in menstrual blood loss as assessed by pictoral blood loss assessment chart was more in group B (50%) than in Group A (30%) (ANOVA, covariates with F=59.647, p<0.001). Difference in improvement of dysmenorrhoea was not statistically significant (p=0.640). Side effects were less in group B compared to group A (p=0.271). Post treatment Hb% significantly improved in both groups (p=0.015 in group A, p<0.001 in gr B). Acceptability was statistically similar in both groups (p>0.05).Conclusions: Both mefenamic acid and tranexamic acid were effective in management of menorrhagia. Tranexamic acid was significantly superior to mefenamic acid in terms of reduction in menstrual blood loss.

scholarly journals Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy Improves Weight Loss Compared to Nonbanded Sleeve: Midterm Results from a Prospective Randomized Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Gentileschi ◽  
Emanuela Bianciardi ◽  
Leandro Siragusa ◽  
Valeria Tognoni ◽  
Domenico Benavoli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Weight Regain ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
To Receive

Background. Weight regain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is nowadays a growing concern. Sleeve dilatation and loss of food restriction is considered the main mechanism. The placement of a silicon ring around the gastric tube seems to give benefits in the short term. We report the results of a randomized study comparing LSG and laparoscopic banded sleeve gastrectomy (LBSG) over a 4-year follow-up. Objectives. To evaluate the efficacy of banded sleeve gastrectomy compared to standard sleeve in the midterm. Methods. Between 01/2014 and 01/2015, we randomly assigned 50 patients to receive one of the two procedures. Patients’ management was exactly the same, apart from the band placement. We analyzed differences in weight loss, operative time, complication rate, and mortality, with a median follow-up of 4 years. Results. Twenty five patients were assigned to receive LSG (Group A) and 25 LBSG (Group B). The mean preoperative BMI (body mass index) was 47.3 ± 6.58 kg/m2 and 45.95 ± 5.85 kg/m2, respectively. There was no significant difference in the operative time. No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. At 12-month follow-up, the mean BMI was 29.72 ± 4.40 kg/m2 in Group A and 27.42 ± 4.47 kg/m2 in Group B (p=0.186). After a median follow-up of 4 years, the mean BMI in Group B was significantly lower than Group A (24.10 ± 4.52 kg/m2 vs 28.80 ± 4.62 kg/m2; p=0.00199). Conclusions. LBSG is a safe procedure, with no impact on postoperative complications. The banded sleeve showed a significant greater weight loss in the midterm follow-up. Considering the issue of weight regain observed after LSG, the placement of a perigastric ring during the first procedure may be a strategy to improve the results. This trial is registered with NCT04228185.

scholarly journals Oral and vaginal route of misoprostol for induction of labour: a comparative study

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 1956
Author(s):  
Deepti D. Sharma ◽  
Kavita A. Chandnani
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Induction Of Labour ◽  
Vaginal Route ◽  
Oral Misoprostol ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B ◽  
To Receive

Background: Induction of labour can be defined as “Artificial initiation of uterine contractions before the onset of spontaneous labour, after the period of viability, by any methods, for purpose of vaginal delivery.” The key factor for a successful induction is the status of cervix, its form, consistency and dilatation which is determined by the Bishop score. In case of unfavourable cervix or in the pregnancies remote from the term; prostaglandins are more effective than any other method of induction. Introduction of misoprostol, PGE1 analogue, for the induction of labour in 1993 and its approval for clinical use by ACOG (American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology) in 1999 has been the most significant advancement. It is the latest drug for induction of labour which is cheap and stable at room temperature and is being used worldwide in different doses and by various routes. We compared the most commonly preferred two routes; vaginal and oral in terms of success of induction and noted the adverse events and side effects in both routes.Methods: This was a prospective comparative study carried out at SBKSMIRC (Shrimati Bhikhiben Kanjibhai Shah Medical Institute and Research Centre), Dhiraj general hospital, Vadodara, Gujarat, 200 patients who required induction of labour were recruited after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria and were randomly divided in two groups- Group A meant to receive 50µg oral misoprostol, Group B - meant to receive 25µg vaginal misoprostol repeated 4 hourly up to maximum of five doses. Progress of labour was charted on the partograph. The mean induction delivery interval, mode of delivery, maternal and neonatal outcomes and complications were observed.Results: The mean induction to delivery interval was significantly less in vaginal group than oral (23.3±12.4 hours in oral vs. 17.3±10 hours in vaginal). Vaginal delivery and cesarean section rates were comparable in both groups (76% in Group A vs. 72% in Group B for vaginal delivery, 18% vs. 20% for Cesarean section, respectively). 58% patients in Group A required more than two doses as compared to 39% in group B, though the difference was statistically not significant. Significant number of patients required added oxytocin administration in Group A (72%). No major complications or adverse events were observed. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia was seen more in Group A.Conclusions: Both Oral misoprostol in a dose of 50μg and vaginal misoprostol 25 μg every four hours, to a maximum of five doses, have the potential to induce labour safely and effectively. The vaginal route however is beneficial in effecting delivery in lesser time with few numbers of doses as compared to oral route.

Role of a modified epigastric port in reducing post operative pain and causing early ambulation in a patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy as compared to a standard four port procedure, a randomized controlled study

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 3986
Author(s):  
Arijit Roy ◽  
Pramatha Nath Datta ◽  
Kushankur Guha
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Recovery ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Post Operative Pain ◽  
Quality Life ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Better Than

Background: Standard four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard in the treatment of gall stones. Modified epigastric port laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be considered an alternative, as this procedure maintains the advantages of four ports and does not require any special set of instruments. In this study we aimed to see whether this procedure is comparable to the standard four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on the primary objectives of postoperative pain score, degree of ambulation, time to return to normal activities.Methods: Consecutive patients due to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, meeting all the predefined criteria were recruited into the study. The group A was assigned to receive intervention in the form of modified epigastric port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The group B was assigned to receive intervention in the form of standard four port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients in group A were compared with patients in group B based on multiple pre-defined parameters.Results: Pain scores were significantly better in group A. Degree of ambulation at was significantly better in group A. In respect to the time to resumption of normal activities there was no significant difference between the two groups. When comparing the quality life at 1 month following surgery with SF-36 health survey, the patients in group A did better than patients in group B with respect to the six scales. Conclusions: Modified epigastric port laparoscopic cholecystectomy appears to be significantly better than the standard four port cholecystectomy in terms of postoperative recovery.

scholarly journals One-Day Antibiotic Infusion for the Prevention of Postoperative Infection Following Arthroplasty: A Case Control Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Niimi ◽  
Masahiro Hasegawa ◽  
Goshin Kawamura ◽  
Akihiro Sudo
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Infection ◽  
Wound Infection Rate ◽  
Antibiotic Administration ◽  
Intravenous Antibiotic ◽  
Intravenous Antibiotics ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Antibiotic Infusion

Intravenous antibiotics effectively reduce the prevalence of postoperative infection. However, Japanese orthopaedic surgeons have no consensus with regard to the optimal duration of prophylaxis. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of one-day intravenous antibiotic administration with that of long-term intravenous antibiotic administration. Patients who underwent total hip or knee arthroplasty were divided into 2 groups to receive one of 2 prophylactic protocols retrospectively. Group A (223 patients) received intravenous antibiotics twice only on the day of surgery, whereas Group B (104 patients) received intravenous antibiotics for at least 3 days after surgery. We analyzed the wound infection rate and monitored liver and renal functions. None of these patients had a postoperative infection. No liver dysfunction and renal dysfunction were observed. One-day antibiotic infusion was as effective as long-term antibiotics in preventing infection after arthroplasty and achieved greater cost effectiveness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document