scholarly journals Registry of Shoulder Arthroplasty – The Scottish Experience

2006 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Sharma ◽  
CR Dreghorn
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Glenoid Component ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Shoulder Replacement ◽  
Joint Registry ◽  
Data Registration ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasties

INTRODUCTION Recognising that timely dissemination of information in the orthopaedic community was important and in the absence of any national guidelines for shoulder arthroplasty, the Scottish shoulder arthroplasty registry, a voluntary registry, was started in 1996. The goals of the registry were to assess contemporary practice, provide a benchmark against which surgeons could compare their practice, identify risk factors for a poor outcome, and to improve outcomes through continuous feedback to the participating surgeons. PATIENTS AND METHODS A standardised proforma was used to collect information on the diagnostic and demographic data, type of procedure performed, type of implant used, any associated procedures performed in conjunction with the arthroplasty, and peri-operative complications. Postoperative pain, activity and patient satisfaction were assessed annually using another standardised proforma. RESULTS Twenty surgeons have contributed to the register and 451 shoulder arthroplasties were registered over a 5-year period. Of patients, 23.2% were male and 76.8% female. The mean age was 65 years (range, 37–90 years). Shoulder arthroplasty was commonly performed for rheumatoid arthritis followed by trauma, osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis of the humeral head. Overall, 397 (88%) patients had a hemi-arthroplasty and 54 (12%) had a total shoulder replacement. Of the 54 cases that had a glenoid replacement, 28 were performed for inflammatory arthritis, 21 for osteoarthritis and 5 were for revisions. The humeral component was cemented in 204 (45%) cases, 160 of whom had a shoulder replacement for trauma. The glenoid component was cemented in 48 (89%) cases. Cross referencing our data with the figures of the actual number of shoulder arthroplasties performed, however, indicated that our registry at best collected only 53% of all the shoulder arthroplasties performed in Scotland annually. CONCLUSIONS The value of a joint registry is dependent on the accuracy and completeness of the data entered. Our registry, therefore, fails as an implant registry. We believe that compliance for data registration can only be ensured if dedicated data collection staff are employed to co-ordinate the data collection and collation process.

scholarly journals Imaging of shoulder arthroplasties and their complications: a pictorial review

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Damien Combes ◽  
Romain Lancigu ◽  
Patrick Desbordes de Cepoy ◽  
Filippo Caporilli-Razza ◽  
Laurent Hubert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Joint Replacement ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Shoulder Joint ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Glenoid Component ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Component Loosening ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasties

Abstract Currently, an increasing number of patients benefit from shoulder prosthesis implantation. Radiologists are therefore more often confronted with imaging examinations involving shoulder arthroplasty, whether during a dedicated examination or incidentally. Standard radiography is the first-line imaging modality in the follow-up of these implants, before the possible use of cross-sectional imaging modalities (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging), ultrasound, or nuclear medicine examinations. Shoulder arthroplasties are divided into three categories: reverse shoulder arthroplasty, total shoulder arthroplasty, and partial shoulder joint replacement (including humeral hemiarthroplasty and humeral head resurfacing arthroplasty). Each of these prostheses can present complications, either shared by all types of arthroplasty or specific to each. Infection, periprosthetic fractures, humeral component loosening, heterotopic ossification, implant failure, and nerve injury can affect all types of prostheses. Instability, scapular notching, and acromial fractures can be identified after reverse shoulder arthroplasty implantation. Glenoid component loosening and rotator cuff tear are specific complications of total shoulder arthroplasty. Progressive wear of the native glenoid is the only specific complication observed in partial shoulder joint replacement. Knowledge of different types of shoulder prostheses and their complications’ radiological signs is crucial for the radiologist to initiate prompt and adequate management.

scholarly journals Journey of the glenoid in anatomic total shoulder replacement

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Castagna ◽  
Raffaele Garofalo
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Glenoid Component ◽  
Shoulder Replacement ◽  
Final Destination ◽  
Component Loosening

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSR) has been shown to generate good to excellent results for patients with osteoarthritis and a functioning rotator cuff. Many studies have reported that the glenoid component loosening and failure remain the most common long-term complication of total shoulder arthroplasty. The approach to glenoid component is critical because a surgeon should consider patient-specific anatomy, preserving bone stock and joint line restoration, for a good and durable shoulder function. Over the years, different glenoid design and materials have been tried in various configurations. These include cemented polyethylene, uncemented metal-backed and hybrid implants. Although advances in biomechanics, design and tribology have improved our understanding of the glenoid, the journey of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty has not yet reached its final destination. This article attempts to describe the evolution of the glenoid component in anatomic TSR and current practice.

scholarly journals Short Humeral Stems in Shoulder Arthroplasty

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-110
Author(s):  
Hwang Kyun Oh ◽  
Tae Kang Lim
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Stress Shielding ◽  
Revision Arthroplasty ◽  
Porous Coating ◽  
Glenoid Component ◽  
Cylindrical Shape ◽  
Press Fit ◽  
Surface Finishes ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Metaphyseal Bone

Since the introduction of shoulder arthroplasty by Neer in 1974, the design of not only the glenoid component but also the humeral component used in shoulder arthroplasty has continually evolved. Changes to the design of the humeral component include a gradually disappearing proximal fin; diversified surface finishes (such as smooth, grit-blasted, and porous coating); a more contoured stem from the originally straight and cylindrical shape; and the use of press-fit uncemented fixation as opposed to cemented fixation. Despite the evolution of the humeral component for shoulder arthroplasty, however, stem-related complications are not uncommon. Examples of stem-related complications include intraoperative humeral fractures, stem loosening, periprosthetic fractures, and stress shielding. These become much more common in revision arthroplasty, where patients are associated with further complications such as surgical difficulty in extracting the humeral component, proximal metaphyseal bone loss due to stress shielding, intraoperative humeral shaft fractures, and incomplete cement removal. Physicians have made many attempts to reduce these complications by shortening the stem of the humeral component. In this review, we will discuss some of the limitations of long-stem humeral components, the feasibility of replacing them with short-stem humeral components, and the clinical outcomes associated with short-stemmed humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty.

scholarly journals Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using a Self-Pressurizing Pegged Bone-Preserving Cemented Glenoid Component: A 2- to 5-Year Follow-up Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 247154921775047
Author(s):  
Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo ◽  
Ngoc Tram V Nguyen ◽  
Mark Morrey
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Loose Body ◽  
Deep Infection ◽  
Glenoid Component ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasties ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasties ◽  
And Function

Background: High rates of radiographic loosening have been reported with various glenoid designs. Many available designs sacrifice most of the bone at the central portion of the glenoid vault, creating large areas of deficiency when revision becomes necessary. The purpose of this study was to report the 2- to 5-year outcome of shoulder arthroplasty using a bone-preserving all-polyethylene glenoid components with self-pressurizing pegs. Methods: Between August 2011 and December 2014, 202 consecutive anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) were performed by a single surgeon with implantation of a self-pressurizing cemented pegged glenoid component in 190 patients (12 patients had both shoulders replaced). Patients were followed up prospectively and evaluated for pain, motion, strength, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and radiographic changes. The mean follow-up time was 2.7 (2–5) years. Results: TSA improved pain and function reliably. At the most recent follow-up, 94% of the shoulders had no or mild pain. Motion included 154 ± 25° of elevation, 68 ± 18° of external rotation, and median internal rotation to T10 (range, iliac crest to T4). The most recent average ASES score was 82 ± 15 points. Early postoperative radiographs showed no radiolucent lines. No humeral or glenoid component was considered radiographically loose at the most recent follow-up. Complications requiring reoperation included subscapularis insufficiency (4), posterior instability (2), deep infection (1), stiffness (1), and a painful loose body (1). No components were revised for loosening. Conclusions: Anatomic TSA using a cemented bone-preserving all-polyethylene pegged self-pressurizing glenoid component provided satisfactory clinical outcomes and survival at 2 to 5 years.

Mid-term radiological results of a cementless short humeral component in anatomical and reverse shoulder arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (5) ◽  
pp. 610-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. R. Aibinder ◽  
D. W. Bartels ◽  
J. W. Sperling ◽  
J. Sanchez-Sotelo
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Stress Shielding ◽  
Radiological Findings ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Bone Changes ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasties ◽  
Glenoid Loosening

Aims Shoulder arthroplasty using short humeral components is becoming increasingly popular. Some such components have been associated with relatively high rates of adverse radiological findings. The aim of this retrospective review was to evaluate the radiological humeral bone changes and mechanical failure rates with implantation of a short cementless humeral component in anatomical (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Patients and Methods A total of 100 shoulder arthroplasties (35 TSA and 65 RSA) were evaluated at a mean of 3.8 years (3 to 8.3). The mean age at the time of surgery was 68 years (31 to 90). The mean body mass index was 32.7 kg/m2 (17.3 to 66.4). Results Greater tuberosity stress shielding was noted in 14 shoulders (two TSA and 12 RSA) and was graded as mild in nine, moderate in two, and severe in three. Medial calcar resorption was noted in 23 shoulders (seven TSA and 16 RSA), and was graded as mild in 21 and moderate in two. No humeral components were revised for loosening or considered to be loose radiologically. Nine shoulders underwent reoperation for infection (n = 3), fracture of the humeral tray (n = 2), aseptic glenoid loosening (n = 1), and instability (n = 3). No periprosthetic fractures occurred. Conclusion Implantation of this particular short cementless humeral component at the time of TSA or RSA was associated with a low rate of adverse radiological findings on the humeral side at mid-term follow-up. Our data do not raise any concerns regarding the use of a short stem in TSA or RSA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:610–614.

scholarly journals Intraoperative complications during revision shoulder arthroplasty: a study using the National Joint Registry dataset

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen M. Ingoe ◽  
Philip Holland ◽  
Paul Cowling ◽  
Lucksy Kottam ◽  
Paul N. Baker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Intraoperative Complications ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression ◽  
National Joint Registry ◽  
Joint Registry ◽  
Primary Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasties

Background The surgical options for revision shoulder arthroplasty and the number of procedures performed are increasing. However, little is known about the risk factors for intraoperative complications associated with this complex surgery. Methods The National Joint Registry (NJR) is a surgeon reported database recording information on major joint replacements including revision shoulder arthroplasty. Using multivariable binary logistic regression modelling, we analyzed 1445 revision shoulder arthroplasties reported to the NJR between April 2012 and 2015. Results The risk of developing a complication during revision surgery was greater than primary arthroplasty (5% versus 2.5%). An intraoperative fracture was the most common complication occurring in 50 (3.5%) cases. Nerve injuries were recorded for two (0.1%) patients and vascular injuries for one (0.1%) patient. The incidence of intraoperative fractures was higher in females than males (relative risk = 3.25; p = 0.005). Periprosthetic fracture as an indication for revision carried the highest risk for any complication (relative risk = 3.00, p = 0.06). Conclusions This is the largest registry study to date investigating the incidence and risk factors for intraoperative complications during revision shoulder arthroplasty. Females have over three times the risk of intraoperative fractures compared to males. This study will help inform surgeons to accurately counsel patients.

Biomechanics and Design of Shoulder Arthroplasty

1995 ◽  
Vol 209 (4) ◽  
pp. 207-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
P J J McCullagh
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Early Experience ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Design Activity ◽  
Shoulder Replacement ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Key Features

Since the introduction by Neer in 1973 of the metal-on-plastic unconstrained total shoulder replacement, unfortunately there have been no long-term clinical follow-up reports. Short- to mid-term information (less than ten years) indicates good to excellent clinical results in approximately 90 per cent of cases. While this early experience is encouraging, much attention has been focused on tucencies of the glenoid componenti which although they may not predispose to failure, have led to considerable design activity. The humeral component has also advanced in design, with modularity of the head in particular providing greater intra-operative flexibility. State-of-the-art instrumentation, borrowing key features found beneficial to hip and knee joint replacement, is an important advancement in contemporary systems. The aim of this paper is to position shoulder arthroplasty in relation to biomechanical considerations and recommendations from clinical experience.

scholarly journals Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty With Proximal Humeral Replacement for the Management of Massive Proximal Humeral Bone Loss

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 247154921877984 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dave R Shukla ◽  
Julia Lee ◽  
Devin Mangold ◽  
Robert H Cofield ◽  
Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Humeral Component ◽  
Attachment Sites ◽  
Lateral Offset ◽  
Component Loosening ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasties

Background Substantial proximal humeral bone loss may compromise reverse shoulder arthroplasty secondary to limited implant support, insufficient soft tissue tension due to shortening, lack of attachment sites for the posterosuperior cuff when present, and lack of lateral offset of the deltoid. In these circumstances, use of a proximal humeral replacement may be considered. Patients/Methods Between 2012 and 2014, 34 consecutive reverse shoulder arthroplasties were performed using a proximal humeral replacement system. The indications were failed shoulder arthroplasty (15), oncology reconstruction (9), humeral malunion/nonunion (7), prior resection arthroplasty (2), and intraoperative fracture (1). All patients were included in the survival analysis. Twenty-two patients with minimum 2-year follow-up were included in analysis of clinical results. Results Among the cohort of 34 patients, there were 8 additional reoperations: humeral loosening (3), periprosthetic fracture (2), irrigation and debridement (2), and glenoid loosening (1). Humeral component loosening occurred exclusively in patients undergoing revision shoulder arthroplasty. The 4 patients had an average 3.75 prior procedures before the proximal humeral replacement. Two of the revisions were from cemented to uncemented stems. Among the 23 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up, there was significant improvement in pain scores (4.1 vs 0.6), forward elevation (31 vs 109) degrees, and 81% were satisfied. Conclusion Use of a proximal humeral replacement when performing a reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the complex setting of substantial proximal humerus bone loss provides good clinical results and a particularly low dislocation rate. However, the rate of loosening of the humeral component in the revision setting suggests that proximal humeral replacement components should be cemented when revising a previously cemented stem. IRB 16-006966.

Patient-specific planning in shoulder arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (3) ◽  
pp. 365-370
Author(s):  
Kyong S. Min ◽  
Henry M. Fox ◽  
Asheesh Bedi ◽  
Gilles Walch ◽  
Jon J. P. Warner
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Surgical Planning ◽  
Ct Images ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Glenoid Component ◽  
Surgical Decision ◽  
Patient Specific Instrumentation ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasties ◽  
Surgical Decision Making

Aims Patient-specific instrumentation has been shown to increase a surgeon’s precision and accuracy in placing the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty. There is, however, little available information about the use of patient-specific planning (PSP) tools for this operation. It is not known how these tools alter the decision-making patterns of shoulder surgeons. The aim of this study was to investigate whether PSP, when compared with the use of plain radiographs or select static CT images, influences the understanding of glenoid pathology and surgical planning. Methods A case-based survey presented surgeons with a patient’s history, physical examination, and, sequentially, radiographs, select static CT images, and PSP with a 3D imaging program. For each imaging modality, the surgeons were asked to identify the Walch classification of the glenoid and to propose the surgical treatment. The participating surgeons were grouped according to the annual volume of shoulder arthroplasties that they undertook, and responses were compared with the recommendations of two experts. Results A total of 59 surgeons completed the survey. For all surgeons, the use of the PSP significantly increased agreement with the experts in glenoid classification (x2 = 8.54; p = 0.014) and surgical planning (x2 = 37.91; p < 0.001). The additional information provided by the PSP also showed a significantly higher impact on surgical decision-making for surgeons who undertake fewer than ten shoulder arthroplasties annually (p = 0.017). Conclusions The information provided by PSP has the greatest impact on the surgical decision-making of low volume surgeons (those who perform fewer than ten shoulder arthroplasties annually), and PSP brings all surgeons in to closer agreement with the recommendations of experts for glenoid classification and surgical planning. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(3):365–370

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document