Mothers' Cultural Approach to Inclusive Education for Children With Intellectual Disability in South Korea: Qualitative Case Study

Inclusion ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-292
Author(s):  
Yunji Jeong ◽  
Ruth Luckasson

Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the knowledge and desires of parents of middle school students with intellectual disability regarding inclusive education practices and laws in South Korea. We interviewed seven mothers of children with ID who attended South Korean middle schools. Three themes emerged including (a) mother-teacher communication, (b) particular knowledge that suppressed further desires for inclusive education, and (c) culture-based advocacy for inclusive education. We discussed these findings based on Rawls's theory of justice, Confucianism, and the social model of disability.

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Patrick Bell

The guitar has a high value in cultural capital and we are immersed in a culture in which the guitar is the predominant vehicle of music-making. Given the guitar's mass popularity, it follows that the guitar-learning community is vast and diverse. Subscribing to the social model of disability, I problematise the guitar as being disabled and conducted an instrumental case study using the ethnographic tools of video-based observation, field notes and a semi-structured interview to chronicle the experience of teaching an adolescent with Down syndrome how to play the guitar. Different approaches to enabling the guitar are examined including open-tuning, standard tuning and a modified two-string guitar. Findings discuss the importance of the guitar to the participant as a percussive and rhythmic instrument and additionally as support for singing in the context of jamming.


Author(s):  
Leslie Francis

Recent theorizing about justice for circumstances of injustice has largely bypassed disability. This chapter explores partial compliance theory through achieving disability civil rights. After sketching the non-ideal and partial compliance theory landscape since Rawls’s development of an ideal liberal theory of justice, the chapter disavows the misleading assumption that disability is non-ideal. Rather, injustice is located in social responses to differences in bodies and minds, as with the social model of disability. Using examples from the Americans with Disabilities Act, employment, and education, the chapter demonstrates how partial compliance theory can negotiate difficult questions about obligations when others behave unjustly and improvements seem infeasible. The chapter then explores disability civil rights without idealizations about justice. It concludes with thoughts about eugenics, why disability has largely been left aside in partial compliance theory, and how understanding disability civil rights can contribute importantly to our understanding of justice in non-ideal circumstances.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marivete Gesser ◽  
Reginaldo Medeiros Martins

Abstract This study aimed to identify the contributions of the discipline of “Disabilities and Inclusion” offered by the Specialization Course on Gender and Diversity at School (GDS) to promote inclusive educational processes for people with disabilities in basic education. Nine GDS students who were professionals from educational area participated in the research. The information was obtained through a focus group, recorded with the participants’ consent and analyzed based on the thematic content analysis method. The results indicated that there was a change in conception of disability, previously based in charitable and/or in biomedical conceptions, now more in line with the Social Model of Disability and with the precepts of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In addition, the knowledge obtained by the participants contributed to the construction of pedagogical strategies more focused on the inclusion of people with disabilities considering their specificities.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Yates

This article aims to amplify disability theory’s impact in performance studies by generating a framework for understanding disability representation in musical theatre. Taking the original and revival Broadway productions of Side Show (1997, 2014) as a case study, I articulate how the musical simulates disability through a ‘choreography of conjoinment’ that relies on the exceptional able-bodiedness of the actors playing conjoined twins Daisy and Violet Hilton. Using disability as a category of analysis reveals how disabled bodies are made to be maximally productive iterations of themselves in musicals. To support this claim, I track the shift from the 1997 production’s co-construction of disability by the actors and audience, which replicates the social model of disability, to the 2014 revival’s grounding in a diagnostic realism typical of disability’s medical model. Side Show’s trajectory generates possibilities for considering the musical as an archive for disability representation and knowledge, bioethical inquiry, and artistic innovation.


Author(s):  
Michalina Grzelka

Beginning from the position of disability understood as a social and cultural construct, this paper aims to analyze and compare representations of disability in fairy tales by such authors as the Grimm brothers, Hans Christian Andersen, Oscar Wilde, Charles Perrault, Giovanni Francesco Straparola, and Jeanne-Marie Leprince de Beaumont. Despite the prevalence of disabled characters in many fairy tales, there exists just a handful of articles on disability in fairy tales within the field of disability studies (Schmiesing 2014). Therefore, this study attempts to fill in a knowledge gap in the area of disability studies by looking at disability and characters with disabilities in fairy tales from the perspective of the social model of disability. In this paper I seek to explore variations in the way different authors describe disability/sickness/deformity and to discuss such subjects related to the area of disability studies as overcoming disability and the question of cure (understood, in the context of fairy tales, as a supernatural restoration to the able-bodied state). In addition, I attempt to see if there exist any differences in how sick/disabled/deformed fairy tales characters are portrayed depending on their gender.


2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 567-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Bartolo

This article discusses the dilemma faced by psychologists in responding to diversity. It is based on a qualitative review of relevant literature over the past decade. It first describes psychologists as frontrunners in recognizing the uniqueness and autonomy of each of their diverse clients but within the biomedical model that locates problems within clients. This raises a dilemma vis-à-vis diversity issues which are associated with discrimination suffered by minority groups who are best supported by changes in social structures and processes. An account is then given of an increasing adoption of a biopsychosocial model, with further influence of the social model of disability and mental health. Evidence of the trend is explored in a new commitment to the human rights agenda, changes in ethical codes, and in psychologists’ engagement with intervention at macro systems levels as in the promotion of inclusive education. The review concludes with the implications of these trends for greater changes in training institutions to reflect openness to diversity, and in training programmes to promote an understanding of, and skills in, using social approaches to addressing the needs of clients who are at risk of being misunderstood, devalued, and discriminated against.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Nor Heu

<p>The inclusive education (IE) strategy promotes the inclusion of all children regardless of their abilities into mainstream schools. Little, however, is known about its impact on the inclusion of children with all sorts of disabilities at the primary school level. This study explores this issue. The main objective of this study is to analyse the impact of the Lao IE strategy in developing the public mainstream primary school system so as to be responsive to the needs of primary school students with impairments in Vientiane, Lao PDR. This is a qualitative research project which adopted semi-structured interviews, observations, and document analysis. Data was gathered from 45 participants from different backgrounds; notes recorded direct observations in primary schools; and documents such as reports and statistics were collected during the field work in Vientiane over the two month period of May and June 2015. The study established that many countries have experienced challenges in translating the IE concept into practice. Lao PDR also faces similar challenges.  The study suggests that despite the ongoing continuous improvement of the Lao IE, the principle of inclusion is not yet fully employed. Children with more complex disabilities, such as being blind, deaf, mute or having an intellectual impairment, are still restricted to studying in special schools. This practice appears to be in contradiction to the principles of inclusion, to the social model of disabilities, and to a rights-based approach to education. In addition, the lack of government funding allocated specifically to implement the IE strategy at both national and local levels indicates the current weakness of the Lao IE system. As a consequence, children with more complex impairments still cannot receive meaningful and quality education in almost all public mainstream primary schools.  Furthermore, it is evident that, although the Lao IE policy officially targets all children, in practice there has, as yet, been little impact on mainstream primary schools that are the focus of this research. Data regarding students with impairments is not collected by the relevant authorities in a consistent system. The IE policy has not been fully translated into mainstream primary school policies and development plans. The existing ‘IE’ schools continue to experience challenges in accessing the essential financial and technical supports they need to prepare to accept children with disabilities. Basic facilities and disabilities-related services are mostly unavailable. Importantly, the Ministry of Education and Sports (MOES) has not yet officially recognised and approved the use of braille and sign language, even though these languages have been developed by the Ministry of Health (MOH), the Centre of Medical Rehabilitation (CMR) to teach only children with disabilities who are enrolled in the Centre. Many people have criticised MOES for not taking the lead in the provision of education for children with disabilities. Although MOES has depended on the CMR’s expertise and resources to support its IE strategy, children with disabilities continuously experience obstacles in accessing and learning together with none disabled students in public mainstream primary schools that adequately meet their basic needs. This is why many people believe that children with disabilities cannot attend mainstream primary schools and the best place to learn was the CMR.  Finally, participants still retained a medical perspective regarding disabilities. The Lao government itself still translates ‘disabilities’ as medically defined health issues. An understanding of disabilities in terms of the more recent social model was not common among participants in this study. Given that many people hold the medical perspective, individual impairments continue to be blamed as barriers to accessing services such as education, which is opposed to the social model approach to disabilities. The present stage of development of Lao IE strategy still seems to reinforce the exclusion of children with disabilities from accessing the education that is their human right.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  
Nor Heu

<p>The inclusive education (IE) strategy promotes the inclusion of all children regardless of their abilities into mainstream schools. Little, however, is known about its impact on the inclusion of children with all sorts of disabilities at the primary school level. This study explores this issue. The main objective of this study is to analyse the impact of the Lao IE strategy in developing the public mainstream primary school system so as to be responsive to the needs of primary school students with impairments in Vientiane, Lao PDR. This is a qualitative research project which adopted semi-structured interviews, observations, and document analysis. Data was gathered from 45 participants from different backgrounds; notes recorded direct observations in primary schools; and documents such as reports and statistics were collected during the field work in Vientiane over the two month period of May and June 2015. The study established that many countries have experienced challenges in translating the IE concept into practice. Lao PDR also faces similar challenges.  The study suggests that despite the ongoing continuous improvement of the Lao IE, the principle of inclusion is not yet fully employed. Children with more complex disabilities, such as being blind, deaf, mute or having an intellectual impairment, are still restricted to studying in special schools. This practice appears to be in contradiction to the principles of inclusion, to the social model of disabilities, and to a rights-based approach to education. In addition, the lack of government funding allocated specifically to implement the IE strategy at both national and local levels indicates the current weakness of the Lao IE system. As a consequence, children with more complex impairments still cannot receive meaningful and quality education in almost all public mainstream primary schools.  Furthermore, it is evident that, although the Lao IE policy officially targets all children, in practice there has, as yet, been little impact on mainstream primary schools that are the focus of this research. Data regarding students with impairments is not collected by the relevant authorities in a consistent system. The IE policy has not been fully translated into mainstream primary school policies and development plans. The existing ‘IE’ schools continue to experience challenges in accessing the essential financial and technical supports they need to prepare to accept children with disabilities. Basic facilities and disabilities-related services are mostly unavailable. Importantly, the Ministry of Education and Sports (MOES) has not yet officially recognised and approved the use of braille and sign language, even though these languages have been developed by the Ministry of Health (MOH), the Centre of Medical Rehabilitation (CMR) to teach only children with disabilities who are enrolled in the Centre. Many people have criticised MOES for not taking the lead in the provision of education for children with disabilities. Although MOES has depended on the CMR’s expertise and resources to support its IE strategy, children with disabilities continuously experience obstacles in accessing and learning together with none disabled students in public mainstream primary schools that adequately meet their basic needs. This is why many people believe that children with disabilities cannot attend mainstream primary schools and the best place to learn was the CMR.  Finally, participants still retained a medical perspective regarding disabilities. The Lao government itself still translates ‘disabilities’ as medically defined health issues. An understanding of disabilities in terms of the more recent social model was not common among participants in this study. Given that many people hold the medical perspective, individual impairments continue to be blamed as barriers to accessing services such as education, which is opposed to the social model approach to disabilities. The present stage of development of Lao IE strategy still seems to reinforce the exclusion of children with disabilities from accessing the education that is their human right.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document