scholarly journals Compact plane illumination plugin device to enable light sheet fluorescence imaging of multi-cellular organisms on an inverted wide-field microscope

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeyi Guan ◽  
Juhyun Lee ◽  
Hao Jiang ◽  
Siyan Dong ◽  
Nelson Jen ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 2773
Author(s):  
Hiroaki Yokota ◽  
Atsuhito Fukasawa ◽  
Minako Hirano ◽  
Toru Ide

Over the years, fluorescence microscopy has evolved and has become a necessary element of life science studies. Microscopy has elucidated biological processes in live cells and organisms, and also enabled tracking of biomolecules in real time. Development of highly sensitive photodetectors and light sources, in addition to the evolution of various illumination methods and fluorophores, has helped microscopy acquire single-molecule fluorescence sensitivity, enabling single-molecule fluorescence imaging and detection. Low-light photodetectors used in microscopy are classified into two categories: point photodetectors and wide-field photodetectors. Although point photodetectors, notably photomultiplier tubes (PMTs), have been commonly used in laser scanning microscopy (LSM) with a confocal illumination setup, wide-field photodetectors, such as electron-multiplying charge-coupled devices (EMCCDs) and scientific complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (sCMOS) cameras have been used in fluorescence imaging. This review focuses on the former low-light point photodetectors and presents their fluorescence microscopy applications and recent progress. These photodetectors include conventional PMTs, single photon avalanche diodes (SPADs), hybrid photodetectors (HPDs), in addition to newly emerging photodetectors, such as silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) (also known as multi-pixel photon counters (MPPCs)) and superconducting nanowire single photon detectors (SSPDs). In particular, this review shows distinctive features of HPD and application of HPD to wide-field single-molecule fluorescence detection.


2005 ◽  
Vol 413 (4-6) ◽  
pp. 280-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Schuster ◽  
Michael Barth ◽  
Achim Gruber ◽  
Frank Cichos

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (15) ◽  
pp. 16195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Oshima ◽  
Hidetoshi Sato ◽  
Hiroko Kajiura-Kobayashi ◽  
Tetsuaki Kimura ◽  
Kiyoshi Naruse ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e96551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavya Mohan ◽  
Subhajit B. Purnapatra ◽  
Partha Pratim Mondal

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1002-1003
Author(s):  
Jason R. Swedlow ◽  
Paul D. Andrews ◽  
Ke Hu ◽  
David S. RoosT ◽  
John M. Murray

Digital fluorescence microscopy is now a standard tool for determining the localization of cellular components in fixed and living cells. Two fundamentally different imaging technologies are available for imaging fluorescently labelled cells and tissues, in either the fixed or living state. The laser scanning microscope uses a diffraction-limited focused beam to scan the sample and develop an image point by point. in addition, a pinhole placed in a plane confocal to the specimen prevents emitted out-of focus fluorescence from reaching the photomultiplier tube (PMT) detector. By combining spot illumination and selection of infocus fluorescence signal, the laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM) creates an image of the specimen largely free of out-of-focus blur. By contrast, a wide-field microscope (WFM) illuminates the whole specimen simultaneously and detects the signal with a spatial array of point detectors, usually a charge-coupled device camera (CCD). This approach collects an image of all points of the specimen simultaneously and includes all the out-of-focus blurred light. Subsequent restoration by iterative deconvolution generates an estimate of the specimen, largely free of out-of-focus blur. While many other fluorescence imaging modalities exist, these two methods represent the majority of the fluorescence imaging systems currently in use in biomedical research.


2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (15) ◽  
pp. 2786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo A. Valdes ◽  
Valerie L. Jacobs ◽  
Brian C. Wilson ◽  
Frederic Leblond ◽  
David W. Roberts ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (10) ◽  
pp. 3311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Maruyama ◽  
Yusuke Oshima ◽  
Hiroko Kajiura-Kobayashi ◽  
Shigenori Nonaka ◽  
Takeshi Imamura ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meijun Pang ◽  
Linlu Bai ◽  
Weijian Zong ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Ye Bu ◽  
...  

Abstract It remains challenging to construct a complete cell lineage map of the origin of vascular endothelial cells in any vertebrate embryo. Here, we report the application of in toto light-sheet fluorescence imaging of embryos to trace the origin of vascular endothelial cells (ECs) at single-cell resolution in zebrafish. We first adapted a previously reported method to embryo mounting and light-sheet imaging, created an alignment, fusion, and extraction all-in-one software (AFEIO) for processing big data, and performed quantitative analysis of cell lineage relationships using commercially available Imaris software. Our data revealed that vascular ECs originated from broad regions of the gastrula along the dorsal–ventral and anterior–posterior axes, of which the dorsal–anterior cells contributed to cerebral ECs, the dorsal–lateral cells to anterior trunk ECs, and the ventral–lateral cells to posterior trunk and tail ECs. Therefore, this work, to our knowledge, charts the first comprehensive map of the gastrula origin of vascular ECs in zebrafish, and has potential applications for studying the origin of any embryonic organs in zebrafish and other model organisms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document