scholarly journals The Impact of Second Primary Malignancies on Head and Neck Cancer Survivors: A Nationwide Cohort Study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. e62116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Jen Liao ◽  
Hsu-Wen Chou ◽  
Chi-Te Wang ◽  
Chen-Shuan Chung ◽  
Mei-Shu Lai
PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e0134160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuh-S Jung ◽  
Jiwon Lim ◽  
Kyu-Won Jung ◽  
Junsun Ryu ◽  
Young-Joo Won

2019 ◽  
Vol 127 ◽  
pp. 109648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakob Schmidt Jensen ◽  
Christian Grønhøj ◽  
Eva Kristine Ruud Kjær ◽  
Birgitte Wittenborg Charabi ◽  
Christian von Buchwald ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6051-6051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei Wei ◽  
Mia Hashibe ◽  
Sarah Abdelaziz ◽  
Jason Hunt ◽  
Luke Buchmann ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1205-1218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuele Leoncini ◽  
Vladimir Vukovic ◽  
Gabriella Cadoni ◽  
Luca Giraldi ◽  
Roberta Pastorino ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 104 (12) ◽  
pp. 946-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erich M. Sturgis ◽  
Robert H. Miller

With improvements in locoregional control, the problem of second primary malignancies is rapidly being pushed to the forefront of head and neck oncology. While the constant long-term risk for the head and neck cancer patient has been well established, efforts at prevention, early detection, and treatment have been somewhat futile. Recent advances in genetic predisposition, biomarkers, photodiagnostic imaging, and differentiation therapy may soon offer improved outcomes. The literature is reviewed and current research is presented regarding the history, epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of second primary malignancies.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 120-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith Elana Giuliani ◽  
Maurene McQuestion ◽  
Lorna Sampson ◽  
Lisa W Le ◽  
Jennifer M. Jones ◽  
...  

120 Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the number and predictors of head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors’ partners unmet needs and how they correspond to the unmet needs of the survivor. Methods: This study accrued consenting partners from among 158 patients with HNC who had completed a onetime survey including demographic information and the Cancer Survivors’ Unmet Needs Measure (CaSUN) between January 2013 and May 2014. Patients’ caregivers were invited to complete the Cancer Survivors’ Partners Unmet Needs Survey (CaSPUN). The mean (± standard deviation) number and proportion of unmet needs on the CaSPUN was calculated. Multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to determine factors associated with greater unmet needs using linear regression. Kappa co-efficient was calculated to examine the agreement between the unmet needs of patients and their partners on 22 corresponding items. Results: The CaSPUN survey was completed by 44 partners of head and neck cancer survivors. At least one unmet need was reported by 29 partners and 4 had a very high number of needs between 31 and 35. The most common unmet needs were “I need help to manage my concerns about the cancer coming back” (41%), “I need more accessible hospital parking” (34%), “ I need help to cope with others not acknowledging the impact of having a partner experience cancer has had on my own life” (30%), “ I need help dealing with changes that cancer has caused in my partner” (27%) and “I need to know all my partners doctors talk to each other to coordinate my partner’s care” (27%). Of the 5 most common items, 3 were in the Relationships domain. On MVA increasing number of unmet needs in patients was significantly associated with increased unmet needs in their partners (p < 0.01). Of the 22 paired items there was fair agreement in 12 items, moderate agreement in 8 items and good agreement in 2 items between patients and partners. Conclusions: A significant proportion of partners of cancer patients experience unmet needs which may differ from those of the patient themselves. Survivorship program should consider independent needs assessment and program development for partners.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document