scholarly journals Trends of Tuberculosis Case Notification and Treatment Outcomes in the Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia: Ten-Year Retrospective Trend Analysis in Urban-Rural Settings

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e114225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mesay Hailu Dangisso ◽  
Daniel Gemechu Datiko ◽  
Bernt Lindtjørn
2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1192-1198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. G. Dememew ◽  
D. Habte ◽  
M. Melese ◽  
S. D. Hamusse ◽  
G. Nigussie ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Mutembo ◽  
Jane Namangolwa Mutanga ◽  
Kebby Musokotwane ◽  
Cuthbert Kanene ◽  
Kevin Dobbin ◽  
...  

Abstract Setting Southern province, Zambia. Background At least 13 – 20% of all Tuberculosis (TB) cases are recurrent TB. Recurrent TB patients have high risk of Multi-Drug Resistant TB (MDR-TB). Objective To estimate the prevalence of recurrent TB among TB cases and compare risk of unfavorable treatment outcomes between rural and urban settings. Methods In a retrospective cohort study, we used mixed effects logistic regression to asses associations between explanatory and outcome variables. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and exposure was setting (rural/urban). Results Overall 3,566 recurrent TB cases were diagnosed among 25,533 TB patients. The prevalence of recurrent TB was 15.3% (95% CI: 14.8 15.9) in urban and 11.3% (95% CI: 10.7 12.0) in rural areas. Death occurred in 197 (5.5%), 103 (2.9%) were lost to follow-up, and 113 (3.2%) failed treatment. Rural settings had 70% higher risk of death (adjusted OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2 2.7). Risk of lost to follow-up was twice higher in rural than urban (adjusted OR: 2.0 95% CI: 1.3 3.0). Compared to HIV-uninfected, HIV-infected individuals on Antiretroviral Treatment (ART) were 70% more likely to die (adjusted OR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2 3.1). Conclusion Recurrent TB prevalence was generally high in both urban and rural settings. The risk of mortality and lost to follow-up was higher among rural patients. We recommend a well-organized Directly Observed Therapy strategy adapted to setting.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. e63174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed A. Yassin ◽  
Daniel G. Datiko ◽  
Olivia Tulloch ◽  
Paulos Markos ◽  
Melkamsew Aschalew ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e0207552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Gashu ◽  
D. Jerene ◽  
D. G. Datiko ◽  
N. Hiruy ◽  
S. Negash ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Mutembo ◽  
Jane Namangolwa Mutanga ◽  
Kebby Musokotwane ◽  
Cuthbert Kanene ◽  
Kevin Dobbin ◽  
...  

Abstract Setting Southern province, Zambia. Background At least 13 – 20% of all Tuberculosis (TB) cases are recurrent TB. Recurrent TB patients have high risk of Multi-Drug Resistant TB (MDR-TB). Objective To estimate the prevalence of recurrent TB among TB cases and compare risk of unfavorable treatment outcomes between rural and urban settings. Methods In a retrospective cohort study, we used mixed effects logistic regression to asses associations between explanatory and outcome variables. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality and exposure was setting (rural/urban). Results Overall 3,566 recurrent TB cases were diagnosed among 25,533 TB patients. The prevalence of recurrent TB was 15.3% in urban and 11.3% in rural areas. Death occurred in 197 (5.5%), 103 (2.9%) were lost to follow (LTFU), and 113 (3.2%) failed treatment. Rural settings had 70% higher risk of death (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2 2.7). Risk of LTFU was twice higher in rural than urban (aOR: 2.0 95% CI: 1.3 3.0). Compared to HIV-uninfected, HIV-infected individuals on Antiretroviral Treatment (ART) were 70% more likely to die (aOR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.2 3.1). Conclusion Recurrent TB prevalence was generally high in both urban and rural settings. The risk of mortality and LTFU was higher among rural patients. We recommend a well-organized Directly Observed Therapy strategy adapted to setting.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 164-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. C. Takarinda ◽  
A. D. Harries ◽  
C. Sandy ◽  
T. Mutasa-Apollo ◽  
C. Zishiri

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document