scholarly journals Predicting Recovery of Voluntary Upper Extremity Movement in Subacute Stroke Patients with Severe Upper Extremity Paresis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e0126857 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Lin Koh ◽  
Shin-Liang Pan ◽  
Jiann-Shing Jeng ◽  
Bang-Bin Chen ◽  
Yen-Ho Wang ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Mangold ◽  
Corina Schuster ◽  
Thierry Keller ◽  
Andrea Zimmermann-Schlatter ◽  
Thierry Ettlin

Background. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) allows active exercises in stroke patients with upper extremity paralysis. Objective. To investigate the effect of motor training with FES on motor recovery in acute and subacute stroke patients with severe to complete arm and/or hand paralysis. Methods. For this pilot study, 23 acute and subacute stroke patients were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 12) and control group (n = 11). Distributed over 4 weeks, FES training replaced 12 conventional training sessions in the intervention group. An Extended Barthel Index (EBI) subscore assessed the performance of activities of daily living (ADL). The Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment (CMSA) measured hand and arm function and shoulder pain. The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) assessed resistance to passive movement. Unblinded assessments were performed prior to and following the end of the training period. Results. The EBI subscore and CMSA arm score improved significantly in both groups. The CMSA hand function improved significantly in the FES group. Resistance to passive movement of finger and wrist flexors increased significantly in the FES group. Shoulder pain did not change significantly. None of the outcome measures, however, demonstrated significant gain differences between the groups. Conclusions. We did not find clear evidence for superiority or inferiority of FES. Our findings, and those of similar trials, suggest that the number of sessions should be at least doubled to test for superiority of FES in these highly impaired patients and approximately 50 participants would have to be assigned to each therapeutic intervention to find significant differences.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-153
Author(s):  
Yong Sung Jeong ◽  
Jong Keun Kim ◽  
Jin Seok Bae ◽  
Hyo Sik Park ◽  
Shin Who Park ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (05) ◽  
pp. 1750080 ◽  
Author(s):  
KRISTINA DAUNORAVIČENĖ ◽  
ARTURAS LINKEL ◽  
JURGITA ŽIŽIENĖ ◽  
JULIUS GRIŠKEVIČIUS ◽  
ALVYDAS JUOCEVIČIUS ◽  
...  

This study focuses on the functional assessment of the upper extremity of stroke patients via analysis of angular kinematics features. Amplitudes and angular velocities of multi-joint movements more precisely describe functional state at different impairment levels. However, the arm movement as a whole could be analyzed by means of joint angle–angle diagrams, which illustrate the 2D trajectory of upper extremity during movement and show the visual ranges of upper extremity in different cycles of motion. The functional range of motion of each upper extremity segment in all patient groups for more accurate assessment of capability was calculated. Moreover, we calculated the area (S) between two curves in joint angle–angle diagrams as a novel index of the complete upper extremity movement range evaluation. Our findings correspond to clinical rates and upper extremity assessment based on joint angle–angle diagrams seems to be a promising method for accurate assessment and/or predicting the outcomes of rehabilitation programs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 193-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne X. J. Wei ◽  
Kenneth N. K. Fong ◽  
Raymond C. K. Chung ◽  
Jennifer M. W. W. Myint ◽  
Hobby K. Y. Cheung ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document