scholarly journals Effects of Mirror Therapy on Subacute Stroke Patients^|^rsquo; Brain Waves and Upper Extremity Functions

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 1119-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sea Hyun Bae ◽  
Woo Sik Jeong ◽  
Kyung Yoon Kim
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Mirror Therapy ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Brain Waves ◽  
Subacute Stroke

Effects of mirror therapy vs modified constraint induced movement therapy on upper extremity in subacute stroke patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 323-329
Author(s):  
Kamatchi Kaviraja ◽  
G Tharani ◽  
G Yuvarani ◽  
N Kaviraja ◽  
Jenifer Augustina S ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Upper Limb ◽  
Movement Therapy ◽  
Systemic Hypertension ◽  
Mirror Therapy ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Functional Index ◽  
Constraint Induced Movement Therapy ◽  
Subacute Stroke ◽  
The Brain

Objective: To compare and to examine the effectiveness of mirror therapy and modified constraint induced movement therapy (mCIMT) on upper extremity in subacute stroke patients. Background: Stroke or cerebral vascular accident is sudden dead of the brain cells due to inadequate blood flow. The WHO defines stroke as rapidly developing clinical signs of focal disturbance of cerebral function, with symptoms lasting for 24hrs or longer or leading to death, with no apparent cause other than of vascular origin. The most common consequence of stroke is loss of upper limb function. The protocol planned for improving the function of upper limb are mirror therapy and modified constraint induced movement therapy (mCIMT). Mirror therapy is a simple and inexpensive treatment which uses the visual information activating the premotor and motor cortex of the brain. This is explained by activation of so called mirrorneuron system. Whereas mCIMT utilises the redundant pathway in brain through neuro plasticity. Methodology: A total of 30 participants with subacute stroke were selected. The inclusion criteria are both gender of age 55-70 years and duration of 2-12 months of post stroke. Participants with mini mental state examination score<24, uncontrolled systemic hypertension, severe shoulder subluxation, previous stroke and severe cardiac failure were excluded. The outcome measures were measured using Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) and Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Scale. Procedure: All 30 participants with sub-acute stroke were divided into two groups. Both the group individuals were assessed for pre test using Fugl Meyer Upper Extremity Scale and Upper Extremity Functional Index Scale. Group A (15) was assigned to mirror therapy for 5 days a week, for 4 weeks and rest intervals was given. Similarly group B (15) was assigned to modified constraint induced movement therapy for 5 days a week, for 4 weeks. Both the groups were given conventional therapy for 20 mins. At the end of study subjects were assessed for post test using UEFI and Fugl Meyer upper extremity scale. Results: The Modified Constraint Induced Movement (mCIMT) is more effective than Mirror Therapy in improving the hemiparetic upper extremity in subacute stroke patients. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.20(2) 2021 p.323-329

scholarly journals Effectiveness of self-administered mirror therapy on upper extremity impairments and function of acute stroke patients: study protocol

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Venkadesan Rajendran ◽  
Deepa Jeevanantham ◽  
Céline Larivière ◽  
Ravinder-Jeet Singh ◽  
Lisa Zeman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Outcome Evaluation ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Mirror Therapy ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Extremity Function ◽  
Upper Extremity Function ◽  
Experimental Group

Abstract Background Many therapeutic interventions are performed by physiotherapists to improve upper extremity function and/or activities of daily living (ADL) in stroke patients. Mirror therapy (MT) is a simple technique that can be self-administered by the patients with intact cognition following patient education by a skilled physiotherapist. However, the effectiveness of self-administered MT in post-stroke patients in upper extremity function remains unclear. Therefore, the objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness of MT in improving upper extremity function and recovery in acute stroke patients. Methods This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, controlled trial with blinded outcome evaluation (PROBE design), in which a total of 36 eligible acute stroke patients will be randomly assigned to control (n=18) and experimental group (n=18). Participants in the control group will receive regular rehabilitation interventions whereas participants in the experimental group will receive MT education in addition to their regular interventions for 4 weeks. Study outcome The primary outcome measure will be upper extremity function that will be measured using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale and the Wolf Motor Function Test. The secondary outcome measure will be behaviors related to ADL as estimated using the Modified Barthel Index. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline and at 4 weeks post-rehabilitation intervention/MT. Results A two-way repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) with time and group effects will be used to analyze between-group differences. The level of significance will be set at P < 0.05. Conclusion The results of the study will provide critical information to include self-administered MT as an adjuvant to regular interventions and may facilitate recovery of the upper extremity function of stroke patients. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04542772. Registered on 9 September 2020. Protocol version: Final 1.0.

Motor Training of Upper Extremity With Functional Electrical Stimulation in Early Stroke Rehabilitation

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Mangold ◽  
Corina Schuster ◽  
Thierry Keller ◽  
Andrea Zimmermann-Schlatter ◽  
Thierry Ettlin
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Shoulder Pain ◽  
Functional Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Passive Movement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Motor Training ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Subacute Stroke

Background. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) allows active exercises in stroke patients with upper extremity paralysis. Objective. To investigate the effect of motor training with FES on motor recovery in acute and subacute stroke patients with severe to complete arm and/or hand paralysis. Methods. For this pilot study, 23 acute and subacute stroke patients were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 12) and control group (n = 11). Distributed over 4 weeks, FES training replaced 12 conventional training sessions in the intervention group. An Extended Barthel Index (EBI) subscore assessed the performance of activities of daily living (ADL). The Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment (CMSA) measured hand and arm function and shoulder pain. The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) assessed resistance to passive movement. Unblinded assessments were performed prior to and following the end of the training period. Results. The EBI subscore and CMSA arm score improved significantly in both groups. The CMSA hand function improved significantly in the FES group. Resistance to passive movement of finger and wrist flexors increased significantly in the FES group. Shoulder pain did not change significantly. None of the outcome measures, however, demonstrated significant gain differences between the groups. Conclusions. We did not find clear evidence for superiority or inferiority of FES. Our findings, and those of similar trials, suggest that the number of sessions should be at least doubled to test for superiority of FES in these highly impaired patients and approximately 50 participants would have to be assigned to each therapeutic intervention to find significant differences.

scholarly journals The effects of very early mirror therapy on functional improvement of the upper extremity in acute stroke patients

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 3519-3524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ipek Yeldan ◽  
Burcu Ersoz Huseyınsınoglu ◽  
Buket Akıncı ◽  
Ela Tarakcı ◽  
Sevim Baybas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Mirror Therapy ◽  
Stroke Patients

scholarly journals Effect of proprioceptive sensation and feedback required for motor learning on function, activity, and daily life behavior of patients after nerve injury

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 474-481
Author(s):  
Jung-Ho Lee
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Daily Activities ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Mirror Therapy ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Proprioceptive Sensation ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Upper Extremity Function ◽  
Function Activity ◽  
Experimental Group

Purpose: This study investigated the effects of modified mirror therapy and taping therapy for providing feedback on upper extremity function, activity, and daily activities of stroke patients. Methods: This study was conducted with 20 stroke patients and randomly assigned 10 subjects to the experimental group and 10 to the control group. In the experimental group, after proprioceptive neuromuscular stimulation treatment, the mirror therapy program was implemented. In the control group, upper extremity taping was performed before proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation treatment. In this study, a prior evaluation using JTT, FIM, and MAL was performed before intervention to evaluate the patient's function and daily life behavior. Post-tests were performed after the last treatment. Results: In the paired-sample T-test used for within-group comparison of JTTs, FIM, and MAL, there was a significant difference between pre- and post-test for all groups. But there was no statistically significant difference between experimental group 1 and experimental group 2 in an independent t-test conducted to compare the effect sizes of treatments. Conclusion: In other words, by applying mirror therapy and taping therapy that can increase proprioceptive sensation and feedback information in stroke patients, upper extremity function and daily activities can be increased.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document