scholarly journals Spatial/Frontal QRS-T Angle Predicts All-Cause Mortality and Cardiac Mortality: A Meta-Analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. e0136174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinlin Zhang ◽  
Qingqing Zhu ◽  
Li Zhu ◽  
He Jiang ◽  
Jun Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cardiac Mortality ◽  
All Cause Mortality

scholarly journals Sudden death in patients with sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily S. Heilbrunn ◽  
Paddy Ssentongo ◽  
Vernon M. Chinchilli ◽  
Anna E. Ssentongo
Keyword(s):  
Sleep Apnea ◽  
Sudden Death ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cardiac Mortality ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

AbstractBackgroundOver 1 billion individuals across the globe experience some form of sleep apnea, and this number is steadily rising. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) can negatively influence one’s quality of life and potentially increase the risk of mortality. However, this association between OSA and mortality has not been comprehensively and thoroughly explored. This meta-analysis was conducted to conclusively estimate the risk of death for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in OSA patients.Study Design4,613 articles from databases including PUBMED, OVID & Joana Briggs, and SCOPUS were comprehensively assessed by two reviewers (AES & ESH) for inclusion criteria. 28 total articles were included, with 22 of them being used for quantitative analysis. Pooled effects of all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and sudden death were calculated by utilizing the metaprop function in R Statistical Software and the random-effects model with appropriate 95% confidence intervals.ResultsAnalysis on 42,032 individuals revealed that those with OSA were twice as likely to die from cardiac mortality compared to those without sleep apnea (HR= 1.94, 95%CI 1.39-2.70). Likewise, individuals with OSA were 1.7 times as likely to die from all-cause sudden death compared to individuals without sleep apnea (HR= 1.74, 95%CI 1.40-2.10). There was a significant dose response relationship between severity of sleep apnea and incidence risk of death, where those with severe sleep apnea wereConclusionsIndividuals with obstructive sleep apnea are at an increased risk for all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. Further research related to appropriate interventions and treatments are necessary in order to reduce this risk and optimize survival in this population.Key MessagesWhat is the key question?Are individuals with sleep apnea at an increased risk for cardiovascular mortality and sudden death?What is the bottom Line?Sleep apnea is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and sudden death, with a dose response relationship, where those with severe sleep apnea are at the highest risk of mortality.Why read on?This is the first systematic review and meta-analyses to synthesize and quantify the risk of mortality in those with sleep apnea, highlighting important directions for future research.Prospero Registration IDCRD42020164941

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Noncardiac Surgery

2009 ◽  
Vol 111 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alisdair D. S. Ryding ◽  
Saurabh Kumar ◽  
Angela M. Worthington ◽  
David Burgess
Keyword(s):  
Brain Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Cardiac Death ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Noncardiac Surgery ◽  
Cardiac Mortality ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Background The prognostic role of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurement before noncardiac surgery is unclear. The authors therefore performed a meta-analysis of studies in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery to assess the prognostic value of elevated BNP or N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) levels in predicting mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction). Methods Unrestricted searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE bibliographic databases were performed using the terms "brain natriuretic peptide," "b-type natriuretic peptide," "BNP," "NT-proBNP," and "surgery." In addition, review articles, bibliographies, and abstracts of scientific meetings were manually searched. The meta-analysis included prospective studies that reported on the association of BNP or NT-proBNP and postoperative major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) or mortality. The study endpoints were MACE, all-cause mortality, and cardiac mortality at short-term (less than 43 days after surgery) and longer-term (more than 6 months) follow-up. A random-effects model was used to pool study results; funnel-plot inspection was done to evaluate publication bias; Cochrane chi-square test and I testing was used to test for heterogeneity. Results Data from 15 publications (4,856 patients) were included in the analysis. Preoperative BNP elevation was associated with an increased risk of short-term MACE (OR 19.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 13.18-29.65; P < 0.0001), all-cause mortality (OR 9.28; 95% CI 3.51-24.56; P < 0.0001), and cardiac death (OR 23.88; 95% CI 9.43-60.43; P < 0.00001). Results were consistent for both BNP and NT-proBNP. Preoperative BNP elevation was also associated with an increased risk of long-term MACE (OR 17.70; 95% CI 3.11-100.80; P < 0.0001) and all-cause mortality (OR 4.77; 95% CI 2.99-7.46; P < 0.00001). Conclusions Elevated BNP and NT-proBNP levels identify patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery at high risk of cardiac mortality, all-cause mortality, and MACE.

Abstract 15686: Early Intervention versus Conservative Management for Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish Kumar ◽  
Monil Majmundar ◽  
Rajkumar P Doshi ◽  
Tikal Kansara ◽  
Mariam Shariff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Intervention ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Prediction Interval ◽  
Severe Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Cardiac Mortality ◽  
Heart Failure Hospitalization ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Introduction: The management of asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) is controversial and guidelines for the management of the same is not updated based on recently available evidence. Hypothesis: The main objective is to determine the optimal strategy for the management of asymptomatic severe AS between early intervention versus conservative management. Methods: We performed a systematic electronic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases from the inception of the database to May 31 st , 2020. We used the Mantel Haenszel method with the Paule-Mandel estimator of Tau 2 and Hartung-Knapp adjustment to calculate relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and 95% prediction interval (PI). We used P curve analysis to assess publication bias and estimate the true effect of an intervention. All analysis was carried out using R version 3.6.2. Results: A total of seven studies were included in the final analysis, consisting of 1213 patients with early intervention and 2601 patients with conservative management. Early intervention as compared to conservative management was associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.21-0.48) (Panel A) , cardiac mortality (RR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.27-0.48) (Panel B) and non-cardiac mortality (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28-0.56) (Panel C) . There was no difference in the risk of sudden cardiac death (RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.15-1.40), stroke (RR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.17-3.64), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.01-16.82) or heart failure hospitalization (RR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.01-5.29) between the groups. The pooled estimate for all the outcomes was associated with low-moderate heterogeneity. Conclusions: Among asymptomatic severe AS patients, early intervention is associated with reduced mortality without increasing any procedure-related clinical outcomes. Hence, this meta-analysis supports early intervention as opposed to watchful waiting for the management of asymptomatic severe AS.

scholarly journals Periodic repolarization dynamics for prediction of mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Cheng ◽  
M Cai ◽  
X Liu ◽  
N Zhang ◽  
R Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Continuous Variable ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Large Sample Size ◽  
Cardiac Mortality ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Repolarization Dynamics ◽  
Periodic Repolarization Dynamics

Abstract Background Prediction of death is the philosopher's stone of arrhythmology. The electrophysiology has proven to be an important tool to predict the risk of death. Periodic repolarization dynamics (PRD) is a novel electrocardiographic marker that indicates the sympathetic effect on repolarization. PRD qualifies the low-frequency oscillations of cardiac repolarization instability using high-resolution 12 channel 24-h Holter recording. Several studies showed that PRD was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. However, the prediction value of PRD has not been established. Purpose To evaluate the prediction value of PRD as an approach of risk stratification that selects patients at a higher risk of death. Methods We conducted electronic searches of MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Science Citation Index Expanded, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry platform (ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to January 9th, 2020. We also screened for relevant abstracts from conferences including ACC Annual Scientific Sessions, ESC Congress and Annual Congress of the EHRA for the last five years (2014–2019). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcome was cardiac mortality. We included study with large sample size while more than one study were found based on the same originated population. We extracted data from included studies and reported pooled outcomes as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidential intervals (CI) for time-to-event outcomes using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model. We did statistical analyses using Stata version 12.0 and R version 3.6.1. Results 5 studies including 6758 patients met all selection criteria for our meta-analysis. Follow-up period ranged from 20.4 to 75.1 months. Among 5 studies, 3 studies considered PRD as dichotomous variable and the cut-off value was 5.75 deg2, while 2 studies considered PRD as continuous variable and coefficient was expressed in standardized units (increase per standard deviation). We did subgroup analysis according to the type of variable because of heterogeneity. There was a significant higher risk of all-cause mortality in PRD ≥5.75 deg2 patients compared with PRD <5.75 deg2 patients (HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.77–3.17). As for continuous variable, increased PRD was a predictor for all-cause death (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.14–1.42) (Figure). The cardiac mortality was significantly increased in patients with PRD ≥5.75 deg2 vs PRD <5.75 deg2 (HR 3.06, 95% CI 1.66–5.65). Increased PRD was associated with cardiac mortality in continuous variable subgroup (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.21–1.48) (Figure). Conclusion Our findings suggest PRD is a significant predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. PRD provides new additional electrophysiological indicator for risk stratification until further investigations are available. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Dose–Response Relation between Tea Consumption and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and All-Cause Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Population-Based Studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 790-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mei Chung ◽  
Naisi Zhao ◽  
Deena Wang ◽  
Marissa Shams-White ◽  
Micaela Karlsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Tea Consumption ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Specific Mortality ◽  
Cvd Mortality

ABSTRACT Tea flavonoids have been suggested to offer potential benefits to cardiovascular health. This review synthesized the evidence on the relation between tea consumption and risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and all-cause mortality among generally healthy adults. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Food Science and Technology Abstracts, and Ovid CAB Abstract databases were searched to identify English-language publications through 1 November 2019, including randomized trials, prospective cohort studies, and nested case-control (or case-cohort) studies with data on tea consumption and risk of incident cardiovascular events (cardiac or peripheral vascular events), stroke events (including mortality), CVD-specific mortality, or all-cause mortality. Data from 39 prospective cohort publications were synthesized. Linear meta-regression showed that each cup (236.6 mL)  increase in daily tea consumption (estimated 280 mg  and 338 mg  total flavonoids/d for black and green tea, respectively) was associated with an average 4% lower risk of CVD mortality, a 2% lower risk of CVD events, a 4% lower risk of stroke, and a 1.5% lower risk of all-cause mortality. Subgroup meta-analysis results showed that the magnitude of association was larger in elderly individuals for both CVD mortality (n = 4; pooled adjusted RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.83, 0.96; P = 0.001), with large heterogeneity (I2 = 72.4%), and all-cause mortality (n = 3; pooled adjusted RR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.90, 0.94; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.3%). Generally, studies with higher risk of bias appeared to show larger magnitudes of associations than studies with lower risk of bias. Strength of evidence was rated as low and moderate (depending on study population age group) for CVD-specific mortality outcome and was rated as low for CVD events, stroke, and all-cause mortality outcomes. Daily tea intake as part of a healthy habitual dietary pattern may be associated with lower risks of CVD and all-cause mortality among adults.

scholarly journals Cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in surgically or medically treated primary aldosteronism: A Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 147032032110037
Author(s):  
Ying Jing ◽  
Kangla Liao ◽  
Ruolin Li ◽  
Shumin Yang ◽  
Ying Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Treatment ◽  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Elevated Risk ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Reduced Risk

Objectives: To compare the effect of surgical or medical treatment on the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD) and all-cause mortality in patients with established primary aldosteronism (PA). Methods: We searched PUBMED, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library for the meta-analysis. We included patients who were diagnosed with PA following guideline-supported protocols and received surgery or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA)-based medical treatment, and age-sex matched patients with treated essential hypertension (EH). Primary endpoints were CVD incidence and all-cause mortality. Results: Compared with EH, patients with treated PA had a higher risk of CVD [odds ratio (OR) 1.79; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39–2.31]. This elevated risk was only observed in patients with medically treated PA [OR 2.11; 95%CI 1.88–2.38] but not in those with surgically treated PA. The risk of all-cause mortality was significantly lower in patients with treated PA [OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.77–0.95] compared to EH. The reduced risk was only observed in patients with surgically treated PA [OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.34–0.66], but not in those with medically treated PA. Conclusions: Patients with medically treated PA have a higher risk of CVD compared to patients with EH. Surgical treatment of PA reduces the risk of CVD and all-cause mortality in patients with PA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document