scholarly journals Rate of reclassification of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases to HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines and response of HER2-equivocal cases to anti-HER2 therapy

PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0241775
Author(s):  
James Crespo ◽  
Hongxia Sun ◽  
Jimin Wu ◽  
Qing-Qing Ding ◽  
Guilin Tang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Her2 Testing ◽  
Primary Disease ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guideline on HER2 testing in breast cancer permits reclassification of cases with HER2-equivocal results by FISH. The impact of such reclassification is unclear. We sought to determine the proportion of HER2-equivocal cases that are reclassified as HER2-negative and the impact of anti-HER2 therapy on survival in HER2-equivocal cases. Methods We reviewed medical records of breast cancer patients who had HER2 testing by fluorescence in stitu hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) performed or verified at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center during April 2014 through March 2018 and had equivocal results according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline. The population was divided into 2 cohorts according to whether the biopsy specimen analyzed came from primary or from recurrent or metastatic disease. HER2 status was reclassified according to the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline. Overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the relationship between anti-HER2 therapy and clinical outcomes was assessed. Results We identified 139 cases with HER2-equivocal results according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline: 90 cases of primary disease and 49 cases of recurrent/metastatic disease. Per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline, these cases were classified as follows: overall, HER2-negative 112 cases (80%), HER2-positive 1 (1%), and unknown 26 (19%); primary cohort, HER2-negative 85 (94%), HER2-positive 1 (1%), unknown 4 (4%); and recurrent/metastatic, HER2-negative 27 (55%) and unknown 22 (45%). Five patients in the primary-disease cohort and 1 patient in the recurrent/metastatic-disease cohort received anti-HER2 therapy. There was no significant association between anti-HER2 therapy and OS or EFS in either cohort (primary disease: OS, p = 0.67; EFS, p = 0.49; recurrent/metastatic-disease, OS, p = 0.61; EFS, p = 0.78. Conclusions The majority of HER2-equivocal breast cancer cases were reclassified as HER2-negative per the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline. No association between anti-HER2 therapy and OS or EFS was observed. HER2-equivocal cases seem to have clinical behavior similar to that of HER2-negative breast cancers.

scholarly journals Outcome of HER2 Testing by FISH applying ASCO/CAP 2007 and 2013 guideline in IHC equivocal group of breast cancer: Experience at tertiary cancer care centre

2017 ◽  
Vol 06 (02) ◽  
pp. 045-046
Author(s):  
Manoj Kumar Panigrahi ◽  
Dushyant Kumar ◽  
Anurag Mehta ◽  
Kandarpa Kumar Saikia
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Chromosome 17 ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Her2 Testing ◽  
Polysomy 17 ◽  
Cancer Experience ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background and Objectives: HER2 testing guideline of ASCO/CAP for interpretation and reporting has recently been revised. The study is aimed to measure the impact of 2013 CAP guideline on equivocal HER2 test outcome (immunohistochemistry [IHC] 2+) when tested by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). The study also aims at finding the frequency of polysomy and monosomy of chromosome 17. Materials and Methods: Specimens were collected in Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India. IHC was performed in every case, and FISH was performed in IHC2+ cases. Results: In final analysis includes 557 subjects on the basis of CAP guideline 2007 and CAP guideline 2013. One hundred ninety-two subjects (34.4%) were HER2 amplified according to CAP scoring 2007, and 246 subjects (44%) according to 2013 CAP scoring. Conclusions: FISH results were evaluated (IHC2 + interpreted according to CAP 2007 guideline) with both 2007 and 2013 ASCO/CAP scoring criteria, we identified significantly more HER2 positive cases as compared to cases evaluated using the 2007 criteria (P < 0.05). We also found that in breast carcinoma, HER2 status in the presence of polysomy 17 may vary with the scoring criteria used. Evaluation of FISH result using 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria means that more patients with breast cancer may be appropriate for targeted treatment with trastuzumab, potentially improving their outcome.

Expression of hormone receptors ERα, ERβ and PgR in HER2-positive breast cancers

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10525-10525
Author(s):  
M. Litwiniuk ◽  
V. Filas ◽  
J. Moczko ◽  
R. Kaleta ◽  
J. Breborowicz
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Detection System ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Her2 Positive Breast Cancer ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

10525 Background: HER-2/neu gene is amplified and overexpressed in 15–20% of invasive breast cancers. HER2-positive breast cancers have a worse prognosis than HER2-negative tumors and distinctive clinical features. They express hormone receptors for estrogen (ERα) and for progesterone (PgR) less frequently than HER2-negative tumors. The identification of the other human estrogen receptor, receptor beta (ERβ), raises a question of ERβ occurrence in HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients and methods: Formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissues from 90 patients with invasive HER2-positive breast cancer and from 99 patients with HER2-negative breast cancer were used in this study. The HER2 status was analyzed using HercepTest TM (IHC), and IHC 2+ results were confirmed with FISH test. Immunostaining for ERα, ERβ and PgR was performed using monoclonal antibodies against ERα, PgR (DakoCytomation) and against ERβ (CHEMICON). The EnVision detection system was applied. The data were analyzed using nonparametric Fisher-Freeman-Halton test; the statistical significance was considered when p < 0.5. Results: Only 33% of the HER2-positive breast cancers were ERα-positive compared with 63% in the HER2-negative group (p < 0.001). The expression of ERβ protein was observed in almost equal frequency in both groups (57% of HER2-positive breast cancers and 57.7% of HER2-negative tumors, p = 0.889). The expression of PgR was observed in 30% of HER2-positive breast cancers and in 68.7% of HER2-negative tumors (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The expression of ERβ (unlike that of ERα and PgR) was similar in HER2-positive and in HER2-negative breast cancers. Thus, ERβ may be a potential target in future endocrine therapy for women with HER2-positive breast cancers. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (SRM-MS) evaluation of HER2 equivocal breast cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12510-e12510
Author(s):  
William Jeffery Edenfield ◽  
Krupa Merchant ◽  
Julie C. Martin ◽  
Leylah Drusbosky ◽  
Mary Helen Elliott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Dynamic Range ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Selected Reaction Monitoring ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Reaction Monitoring ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive

e12510 Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) is a significant driver of breast oncogenesis and has been found to be amplified in one-fifth of all breast cancers. Identification of cell surface over-expression of HER2 can be completed using immunohistochemistry (IHC), while amplification of the gene can be detected using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or differential polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Definitive diagnostic standards for each detection method are established, however approximately 5-10% of breast cancer patients have a HER2 status of “double equivocal,” offering little guidance to directing therapy. Previously, selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (SRM-MS) illustrated the dynamic range of HER2 positive protein expression by IHC or amplified FISH to have a threshold determination of 740amol.We hypothesized that this method could delineate which ‘double equivocal’ patients may indeed express enough HER2 to be candidates for targeted therapy. Methods: Overall, 76 invasive breast cancer samples identified as equivocal by IHC and FISH between 1/1/2010 and 12/31/2017 were evaluated. Typical demographic and clinicopathologic data were collected to include age, race, histology, size, hormone receptor status, treatments and outcomes. HER2 levels in each equivocal sample were quantitated using SRM-MS. Data were analyzed using Fisher’s t-tests, chi-square and ANOVA (p < 0.05). Results: Using the 740 amol/ng as the SRM-MS cut-off for HER2 positivity, the group was divided into two cohorts. No significant differences were found for demographic or pathologic variables. While identified HER2 levels were between 209.1-1286.6amol, 18 patients had SRM-MS results above the threshold but outcomes were not correlated with treatment received. Conclusions: We report the largest series of doubly equivocal HER2 patients evaluated with SRM-MS. For patients with invasive ductal carcinoma, SRM-MS was not able to identify patients for whom HER2 directed therapy would be a benefit. Future plans include an assessment of this cohort with an RNA seq algorithm given the high degree of accuracy we have shown with known HER2 positives and negatives.

Effect of Delay in Initiation of Adjuvant Trastuzumab and Dose Interruptions on Overall Treatment Outcome in Breast Cancer Patients, a Retrospective Study

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atef Youssef Riad ◽  
Azza Mohammed Adel Alkhateeb ◽  
Mohammed Reda Kelany ◽  
Mohammed Al-Saeed Sakran Ali Al-Shater
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Adjuvant Trastuzumab ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background HER2 amplification or protein over-expression is found in 20% of invasive breast cancers. It’s clearly associated with accelerated cell growth and proliferation and poor clinical outcome. The amplification of HER2 was historically an adverse prognostic factor associated with a higher risk of recurrence, lack of or lower levels of ER expression, and relative resistance to endocrine therapy and CMF based chemotherapy. Objectives We aimed in this study to assess the impact of delaying the initiation of adjuvant Trastuzumab for more than three months after the diagnosis of breast cancer and the effect of irregular and interrupted doses of adjuvant Trastuzumab, on progression free Survival, relapse, and overall survival (OS) among patients with breast cancer. Patients and Methods A Retrospective cohort study was conducted in Ain Shams University Hospitals. The study included one hundred patients with HER2 positive breast cancer. from January 2011 till December 2016 at the" Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Ain Shams University Hospitals". Results The median time to progression in group I was 19 months compared to 30 months in group II. There was statistically significant decrease median of group I compared to group II according to PFS. Conclusion We concluded that delays in the initiation of adjuvant treatment may be particularly harmful in patients with more aggressive tumor types.

Prognostic subset of metastatic and non-metastatic luminal B breast cancer (LBBC) subtype based on Ki67 index.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12570-e12570
Author(s):  
Lalnun Puii ◽  
Lalram Sangi ◽  
Hrishi Varayathu ◽  
Samuel Luke Koramati ◽  
Beulah Elsa Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Ki67 Index ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Luminal B ◽  
Therapeutic Implications ◽  
Significant Difference

e12570 Background: Gene expression profiling for breast cancer has classified ER positive subtype into luminal A and luminal B. Luminal B breast cancer (LBBC) have a higher proliferation and poorer prognosis than luminal A tumors. Ki-67 index is the commonly used proliferation marker in breast cancer; however Ki67 expression can also be used to identify a subset of patients among LB with a favorable prognosis. This study attempts to verify this subset of LBBC patients based on DFS and PFS in non-metastatic and metastatic patients respectively. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 80 IDC breast cancer patients diagnosed in 2013-2016 with complete follow-up till January-2021. We defined LBBC as ER+, PR+ or PR- , HER2+ or HER2- with a Ki67 index >20%. PFS was considered as the endpoint in patients presenting with metastatic disease whereas DFS was used in non-metastatic disease. The cut-off for ki67 was calculated using an X-tile plot (version 3.6.1, Yale University) by dividing Ki67 data into two populations: low and high, with randomized 1:1 “training” and “validation” cohorts. Results: Median age was 51.5 years. 18.7% (n=15) presented with metastasis at the time of diagnosis and their overall median PFS was found to be 25.8 months. The incidence of HER2 positive LBBC was found to be 15% (n=12) and none of them were found to be presented with metastasis. Survival and frequency of various sub groups in our study are enlisted in the given table. We estimated a Ki67 cut-off of 30% in patients with upfront metastatic disease and PFS was found to be higher in <30% compared to a Ki67 index >30% (38.9 months vs 19.7 months, p-0.002). Overall median DFS was not achieved in non-metastatic group (Mean DFS: 64.7 months) where as a statistically significant difference was observed in the survival of HER2 positive (median DFS: 53.5 months, mean DFS: 50.9) than HER2 negative patients (median DFS not achieved, mean: 66.97 months) ( p-0.021). We obtained a Ki67 cut-off of 32% in non- metastatic group and mean DFS was found to be higher in Ki67<32% (69 months) compared to Ki67>32% (61.4 months), however it failed to exhibit a statistically significant relationship ( p-0.373). Conclusions: Our study indicates that a subset of patients exists within metastatic and non-metastatic LBBC with differing prognosis based on Ki67. Larger studies are further required to confirm the findings and therapeutic implications.[Table: see text]

Profiling receptor tyrosine kinase fusions in Chinese breast cancers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15092-e15092
Author(s):  
Zhonghua Tao ◽  
Xichun Hu ◽  
Wen-Ming Cao ◽  
Jianxia Liu ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtype ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Domain ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive

e15092 Background: Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are a class of tyrosine kinases that regulate cell-to-cell communication and control a variety of complex biological functions. Dysregulation of RTK signaling partly due to chromosomal rearrangements leads to novel tyrosine kinase fusion oncoproteins which are possibly driver alterations to cancers. Targeting some RTK fusions with specific tyrosine kinases inhibitors (TKIs) is an effective therapeutic strategy across a spectrum of RTK fusion-related cancers. However, there is still a paucity of extensive RTK fusion investigations in breast cancer. We aimed to characterize RTK fusions in Chinese breast cancer patients. Methods: An in-house sequencing database of 1440 Chinese breast cancer patients using a 520-gene NGS sequencing panel was thoroughly reviewed. RTK fusion was defined as an in-frame fusion with the tyrosine kinase domain of the RTK completely retained with the only exception of ERBB2 fusion which was not counted due to its unclear significance. Concomitant mutations and TMB were also analyzed and calculated. Patients’ clinical characteristics were retrieved from case records. Results: 27 RTK fusion-positive breast cancers (12 tissues + 15 plasmas) were identified, patients had a median age of 52 years. Triple-negative breast cancer subtype comprised 37% with luminal and HER2 positive subtypes being 40.8% and 22.2%, respectively. 77.8% of patients were at stage IV and 22.2% at stage I-III. Ten were treatment naïve. RTK fusions occurred in 2% of breast cancers in our database, compared with the prevalence of 0.6% and 1.3% in MSKCC and TCGA, respectively. In the subset of stage IV patients, our database showed a significantly higher RTK fusion frequency than that in MSKCC (3.2% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.013). FGFR2 fusions were seen most commonly (n = 7), followed by RET (n = 4), ROS1 (n = 3), NTRK3 (n = 3), BRAF (n = 2), and NTRK1 (n = 2). Other RTK fusions including ALK, EGFR, FGFR1, FGFR3, MET, and NTRK2 were identified in one patient each. Of note, the normalized abundance of RTK fusion (fusion AF/max AF) correlated negatively with TMB (r = -0.48, p = 0.017). Patients with TMB < 4 (Muts/Mb) displayed a higher fusion abundance than those with TMB ≥ 4 (Muts/Mb) (p = 0.018), suggesting a higher likelihood of subclonal nature for RTK fusions in TMB-high patients. Moreover, CREBBP mutation only co-occurred with FGFR2 fusion (p = 0.012), while NTRK3 fusion and TP53 mutation were mutually exclusive (p = 0.019). Conclusions: This is the first study comprehensively delineating the prevalence and spectrum of RTK fusions in Chinese breast cancers. Further study is ongoing to identify the enriched subpopulation which may benefit from RTK fusion inhibitors.

Comparison of HER2 Status by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry to Predict Benefit From Dose Escalation of Adjuvant Doxorubicin-Based Therapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (19) ◽  
pp. 4287-4297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn G. Dressler ◽  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
Gloria Broadwater ◽  
David Cowan ◽  
Kelly Cox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Purpose HER2 is a clinically important tumor marker in breast cancer; however, there is controversy regarding which method reliably measures HER2 status. We compared three HER2 laboratory methods: immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), to predict disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy in node-positive breast cancer patients. Methods This is a Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study, using 524 tumor blocks collected from breast cancer patients registered to clinical trial CALGB 8541. IHC employed CB11 and AO-11-854 monoclonal antibodies; FISH used PathVysion HER2 DNA Probe kit; PCR utilized differential PCR (D-PCR) methodology. Results Cases HER2 positive by IHC, FISH and D-PCR were 24%, 17%, and 18%, respectively. FISH and IHC were clearly related (κ = 64.8%). All three methods demonstrated a similar relationship for DFS and OS. By any method, for patients with HER2-negative tumors, there was little or no effect of dose of adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy. For patients with HER2-positive tumors, all three methods predicted a benefit from dose-intense (high-dose) compared with low- or moderate-dose adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy. Conclusion FISH is a reliable method to predict clinical outcome following adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy for stage II breast cancer patients. There is a moderate level of concordance among the three methods (IHC, FISH, PCR). None of the methods is clearly superior. Although IHC-positive/FISH-positive tumors yielded the greatest interaction with dose of therapy in predicting outcome, no combination of assays tested was statistically superior.

The Impact of Primary Tumor Surgery on Survival in HER2 Positive Stage IV Breast Cancer Patients in the Current Era of Targeted Therapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 2711-2720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ross Mudgway ◽  
Carlos Chavez de Paz Villanueva ◽  
Ann C. Lin ◽  
Maheswari Senthil ◽  
Carlos A. Garberoglio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Primary Tumor ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Tumor Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Stage Iv Breast Cancer ◽  
The Impact

HER2 status testing by immunohistochemical and fFluorescence in situ hybridization in China

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22233-e22233
Author(s):  
W. Tao ◽  
J. Zefei ◽  
Z. Xuan ◽  
L. Xiaobing ◽  
Z. Shaohua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Central Laboratory ◽  
Her2 Gene ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Clinical Prognosis ◽  
Her2 Testing ◽  
Regional Laboratory

e22233 Background: HER2 gene overexpression is associated with aggressive breast cancer and poor clinical prognosis. Humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, which is targeted HER2 protein has showed to improve overall survival in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer in both the metastatic and adjuvant settings. There are some differences in HER2 positive rate among difference reports in China. This study tested HER2 status by immunohistochemistry(IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and compared HER2 testing at central and regional laboratories in China. Methods: Assessment of HER2 status was performed by FISH using the HercepTeast kit at central laboratory and by IHC using commercial available anti-HER2 probe in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue section of 280 breast cancer samples. IHC HER2 testing was performed on 149 samples in the central laboratory. IHC HER2 testing was performed on 80 samples at both central laboratory and regional laboratory. Results: 280 samples were tested 373 times testing by IHC and FISH. The results were showed in table 1 . 80 samples was tested by IHC at central and regional laboratory and testing results of 36.4% samples were accordant (K=0.038). 94.1% IHC3+ at central laboratory were HER2 FISH positive and 83.3% IHC 3+ at regional laboratory were HER2 FISH positive. 86.7% IHC 2+ at central laboratory were HER2 FISH positive and 62.7% IHC 2+ at regional laboratory were HER2 FISH positive. 17 samples were observed HER2 FISH positive in the 27 IHC 0/1+ tested at regional laboratoty. So good correlation was obsearved between FISH HER2 status and IHC results from central laboratory but not from regional laboratory. Conclusions: This study emphasized the important of accurate HER2 testing. HER2 FISH test should be performed for the IHC 2+ samples. Even HER2 FISH test maybe performed for IHC 0/1 sample according to clinical characteristics in China in order to make the patients have targeted therapy chance. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document