A test-retest reliability study of assessing small cutaneous fibers by measuring current perception threshold with pin electrodes

Background The quantitative measurement of current perception threshold (CPT) has been used as a method to assess the function of nerve fibers in neuropathy diseases. The aim of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability measuring CPT using the circular pin electrodes for assessing the function of cutaneous thin nerve fibers. Methods CPT measurement was repeated on two separate days with at least one-week interval in 55 volunteers. Superficial blood flow (SBF) and skin temperature (ST) were measured on the skin in an around area concentric to the circular pin electrodes after the process of finding CPTs. The coefficient of variation (CV) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated. The correlation between each two of CPT, SBF increment and ST increment was analyzed. Results No significant differences were found for CPT, SBF and ST between two sessions. SBF was found to be significantly increased after the process of finding CPT. CPT values of males were found to be higher than females. SBF increment was found to be positively correlated with ST increment. The ICC values for CPT, SBF and ST were 0.595, 0.852 and 0.728, respectively. The CV values for CPT, SBF and ST were 25.53%, 12.59% and 1.94%, respectively. Conclusions The reliability of CPT measurement using circular pin electrodes is fair, and need consistence of measurements in longitudinal studies.

Download Full-text

The Influence of Maximal Strength and Knee Angle on the Reliability of Peak Force in the Isometric Squat

Sports ◽

10.3390/sports9100140 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 9 (10) ◽

pp. 140

Author(s):

Arthur E. Lynch ◽

Robert W. Davies ◽

Philip M. Jakeman ◽

Tim Locke ◽

Joanna M. Allardyce ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Peak Force ◽

Knee Angle ◽

Force Output ◽

Reliable Measure ◽

Intra Class Correlation ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

Intra Class Correlation Coefficient ◽

Acceptable Reliability ◽

Maximal Effort

This study aimed to investigate the test-retest reliability of peak force in the isometric squat across the strength spectrum using coefficient of variation (CV) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). On two separate days, 59 healthy men (mean (SD) age 23.0 (4.1) years; height 1.79 (0.7) m; body mass 84.0 (15.2) kg) performed three maximal effort isometric squats in two positions (at a 120° and a 90° knee angle). Acceptable reliability was observed at both the 120° (CV = 7.5 (6.7), ICC = 0.960 [0.933, 0.977]) and 90° positions (CV = 9.2 (8.8), ICC = 0.920 [0.865, 0.953]). There was no relationship between peak force in the isometric squat and the test-retest reliability at either the 120° (r = 0.052, p = 0.327) or 90° (r = 0.014, p = 0.613) positions. A subgroup of subjects (n = 17) also completed the isometric squat test at a 65° knee angle. Acceptable reliability was observed in this position (CV = 9.6 (9.3), ICC = 0.916 [0.766, 0.970]) and reliability was comparable to the 120° and 90° positions. Therefore, we deem isometric squat peak force output to be a valid and reliable measure across the strength spectrum and in different isometric squat positions.

Download Full-text

Validity and reliability of the English and translated Chinese versions of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS) in Singapore

10.21203/rs.3.rs-120229/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Victoria Long ◽

Yin Bun Cheung ◽

Debra Qu ◽

Katherine Lim ◽

Guozhang Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Correlation Coefficient ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Validity And Reliability ◽

Cronbach’S Alpha ◽

Rater Reliability ◽

Intra Class Correlation ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Cronbach's Alpha ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

Intra Class Correlation Coefficient

Abstract Context: Measurement of patient-centred outcomes enables clinicians to focus on patient and family priorities and enables quality of palliative care to be assessed.Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the English and translated Chinese IPOS among advanced cancer patients in Singapore.Methods: IPOS was forward and backward translated from English into Chinese. Structural validity was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis; known-group validity by comparing inpatients and community patients; construct validity by correlating IPOS with Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-revised (ESAS-r) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General (FACT-G); internal consistency by Cronbach’s alpha; inter-rater reliability between patient and staff responses; test-retest reliability of patient responses between two timepoints.Results: 111 English-responding and 109 Chinese-responding patients participated. The three-factor structure (Physical Symptoms, Emotional Symptoms and Communication and Practical Issues) was confirmed with Comparative Fit Index and Tucker-Lewis-Index > 0.9 and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation < 0.08. Inpatients scored higher than outpatients as hypothesised. Construct validity (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r≥|0.608|) was shown between the related subscales of IPOS and FACT-G and ESAS-r. Internal consistency was confirmed for total and subscale scores (Cronbach's alpha ≥ 0.84), except for the Communication and Practical Issues subscale (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.29–0.65). Inter-rater reliability (Intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC] ≤ 0.43) between patient and staff responses was insufficient. Test-retest reliability was confirmed with Intra-class correlation coefficient ICC = 0.80 (English) and 0.88 (Chinese) for IPOS Total.Conclusion: IPOS in English and Chinese showed good validity, good internal consistency, and good test-retest reliability, except for the Communication and Practical Issues subscale. There was poor inter-rater reliability between patients and staff.

Download Full-text

Psychometric validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale in Polish (IPOS-Pol)

Palliative & Supportive Care ◽

10.1017/s1478951521001176 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Marta Szeliga ◽

Aleksandra Kotlińska-Lemieszek ◽

Paweł Jagielski ◽

Wojciech Jaroszewski ◽

Ilona Kuźmicz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Palliative Care ◽

Correlation Coefficient ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Intra Class Correlation ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Patient Version ◽

Eortc Qlq ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

Intra Class Correlation Coefficient

Abstract Objective The study aimed to assess the reliability and validity of the IPOS-Pol for patient self-reporting. Method Patients (>18 years of age) with advanced cancer admitted to three palliative care centers (inpatient units and home-based) were recruited to a multicenter, cross-sectional, observational, prospective study. Participants provided responses to the IPOS-Pol Patient version and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire – Core 15 – Palliative Care (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL) Polish version at baseline (T1) and four to seven days later (T2). We assessed test–retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity of the tool. Results One hundred and eighty patients were included. Test–retest reliability demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the average outcomes of the IPOS-Pol between T1 and T2 (27.2 ± 9.2 vs. 26.5 ± 8.7; p > 0.05). The intra-class correlation coefficient between T1 and T2 was r = 0.83 (p < 0.0001), the intra-class correlation coefficient for test–retest reliability of the IPOS-Pol items ranged from 0.63 to 0.84 (p < 0.0001), and the Cronbach's α coefficient for internal consistency was 0.773. The correlation coefficient between the IPOS-Pol and EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL total score was 0.79 (p < 0.001). Significance of results The patient version of the Polish adaptation of IPOS is a valid and reliable outcome measure for assessing symptoms and concerns of individuals receiving palliative care, as well as the quality of care provided.

Download Full-text

Walking speed of normal subjects and amputees: Aspects of validity of gait analysis

Prosthetics and Orthotics International ◽

10.3109/03093649309164360 ◽

1993 ◽

Vol 17 (2) ◽

pp. 78-82 ◽

Cited By ~ 55

Author(s):

A. M. Boonstra ◽

V. Fidler ◽

W. H. Eisma

Keyword(s):

Walking Speed ◽

Normal Subjects ◽

Simultaneous Recording ◽

Intra Class Correlation ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Fast Speed ◽

Walking Speeds ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

Knee Disarticulation ◽

Intra Class Correlation Coefficient

This study investigated some aspects of the validity of walking speed recording in 15 normal subjects, 16 trans-femoral amputees and 8 knee disarticulation amputees. The variability and test-retest reliability of walking speed and the influence of simultaneous recording of EMG and goniometry on comfortable and fast walking speeds were studied. The variability between sessions was mainly determined by the variance within each session. The variance of speed within sessions while walking with fast speed, was higher when walking without equipment than when walking with equipment. The variances of speed within sessions of the normal subjects were higher than those for both amputee groups. The test-retest reliability, expressed by the intra-class correlation coefficient, was good: between 0.83 and 0.98. The speed when walking without equipment was significantly higher both in normal subjects and amputees than the speed when.walking with equipment.

Download Full-text

Test-Retest Reliability of Level-Specific CE-Chirp Auditory Brainstem Response in Normal-Hearing Adults

Journal of Audiology & Otology ◽

10.7874/jao.2020.00073 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 25 (1) ◽

pp. 14-21

Author(s):

Fatin Nabilah Jamal ◽

Ahmad Aidil Arafat Dzulkarnain ◽

Fatin Amira Shahrudin ◽

Muhammad Nasrullah Marzuki

Keyword(s):

Auditory Brainstem Response ◽

Auditory Brainstem ◽

Normal Hearing ◽

Intra Class Correlation ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Clinical Session ◽

Brainstem Response ◽

The Right ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

Intra Class Correlation Coefficient

Background and Objectives: There is growing interest in the use of the Level-specific (LS) CE-Chirp® stimulus in auditory brainstem response (ABR) due to its ability to produce prominent ABR waves with robust amplitudes. There are no known studies that investigate the test-retest reliability of the ABR to the LS CE-Chirp® stimulus. The present study aims to investigate the test-retest reliability of the ABR to the LS CE-Chirp® stimulus and compare its reliability with the ABR to standard click stimulus at multiple intensity levels in normal-hearing adults.Subjects and Methods: Eleven normal-hearing adults participated. The ABR test was repeated twice in the same clinical session and conducted again in another session. The ABR was acquired using both the click and LS CE-Chirp® stimuli at 4 presentation levels (80, 60, 40, and 20 dBnHL). Only the right ear was tested using the ipsilateral electrode montage. The reliability of the ABR findings (amplitudes and latencies) to the click and LS CE-Chirp® stimuli within the same clinical session and between the two clinical sessions was calculated using an intra-class correlation coefficient analysis (ICC).Results: The results showed a significant correlation of the ABR findings (amplitude and latencies) to both stimuli within the same session and between the clinical sessions. The ICC values ranged from moderate to excellent. Conclusions: The ABR results from both the LS CE-Chirp® and click stimuli were consistent and reliable over the two clinical sessions suggesting that both stimuli can be used for neurological diagnoses with the same reliability.

Download Full-text