scholarly journals Comparison of VividTrac, King Vision and Macintosh laryngoscopes in normal and difficult airways during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation among novices

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0260140
Author(s):  
Dóra Keresztes ◽  
Ákos Mérei ◽  
Martin Rozanovic ◽  
Edina Nagy ◽  
Zoltán Kovács-Ábrahám ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Difficult Airway ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽  
Dental Trauma ◽  
Esophageal Intubation ◽  
Successful Intubation ◽  
Normal Airway ◽  
Novice Users

Introduction Early endotracheal intubation improves neurological outcomes in cardiopulmonary resuscitation, although cardiopulmonary resuscitation is initially carried out by personnel with limited experience in a significant proportion of cases. Videolaryngoscopes might decrease the number of attempts and time needed, especially among novices. We sought to compare videolaryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopes in simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenarios. Materials and methods Forty-four medical students were recruited to serve as novice users. Following brief, standardized training, students executed endotracheal intubation with the King Vision®, Macintosh and VividTrac® laryngoscopes, on a cardiopulmonary resuscitation trainer in normal and difficult airway scenarios. We evaluated the time to and proportion of successful intubation, the best view of the glottis, esophageal intubation, dental trauma and user satisfaction. Results In the normal airway scenario, significantly shorter intubation times were achieved using the King Vision® than the Macintosh laryngoscope. In the difficult airway scenario, we found that the VividTrac® was superior to the King Vision® and Macintosh laryngoscopes in the laryngoscopy time. In both scenarios, we noted no difference in the first-attempt success rate, but the best view of the glottis and dental trauma, esophageal intubation and bougie use were more frequent with the Macintosh laryngoscope than with the videolaryngoscopes. The shortest tube insertion times were achieved using the King Vision® in both scenarios. Conclusion All providers achieved successful intubation within three attempts, but we found no device superior in any of our scenarios regarding the first-attempt success rate. The King Vision® was superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope in the intubation time in the normal airway scenario and noninferior in the difficult airway scenario for novice users. We noted significantly less esophageal intubation using the videolaryngoscopes than using the Macintosh laryngoscope in both scenarios. Based on our results, the KingVision® might be recommended over the VividTrac® and Macintosh laryngoscopes for further evaluation.

scholarly journals Comparison of VividTrac®, King Vision® and Macintosh laryngoscopy for normal and difficult airways during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation among novices

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dóra Keresztes ◽  
Ákos Mérei ◽  
Martin Rozanovic ◽  
Edina Nagy ◽  
Zoltán Kovács-Ábrahám ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Difficult Airway ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
User Satisfaction ◽  
Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽  
Dental Trauma ◽  
Esophageal Intubation ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Normal Airway ◽  
Novice Users

Abstract Background: Successful early endotracheal intubation improves neurological outcomes in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, endotracheal intubation should not compromise cardiopulmonary resuscitation effectiveness and thus requires experience. The use of videolaryngoscopes might decrease the number of attempts as well as the time needed for intubation, especially among novice users. We sought to compare videolaryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenarios in mannequins by novices.Methods: Forty-four medical students were recruited to serve as novice users. Following brief, standardized training, students were asked to execute endotracheal intubation with each of the devices, including the King Vision®, the Macintosh laryngoscope and the VividTrac®, on acardiopulmonary resuscitation trainer (Ambu Man Advanced®) in normal and difficult airway scenarios. We evaluated the time to and the proportion of successful intubation, the best view of the glottis, esophageal intubation, dental trauma and user satisfaction.Results: In the normal airway scenario, significantly shorter intubation times (P < 0.05) were measured by King Vision®than by Macintosh laryngoscope. However, VividTrac® was proven to be similar (P > 0.05) to Macintosh laryngoscope in this regard in the normal airway scenario. In the difficult airway scenarios, we found VividTrac® superior (P < 0.05) to King Vision® and Macintosh laryngoscope regarding laryngoscopy times, but there were no significant differences between devices in intubation times. In both normal and difficult airway cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenarios, we noted no difference (P > 0.05) in first attempt success rates, the best view of the glottis and dental trauma, but esophageal intubation and the use of bougie were more frequent (P < 0.05) withMacintosh laryngoscopethan with videolaryngoscopes. The shortest tube insertion times were related to King Vision® in both scenarios.Conclusion: Based upon our results, King Vision®was superior to Macintosh laryngoscoperegarding intubation time in the normal airway cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenario for novice users. We noted significantly less esophageal intubationwhen using videolaryngoscopes compared to Macintosh laryngoscope in both scenarios; thus,videolaryngoscopes might be recommended for novice users for both cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenarios.

scholarly journals Systematic Review Comparison of Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate Using McGrath® Mac Videolaryngoscope with Direct Laryngoscope (Macintosh): A Manikin Studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Dicha Niswansyah Auliyah ◽  
Prananda Surya Airlangga ◽  
Lilik Herawati
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Difficult Airway ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Medical Personnel ◽  
Learning Material ◽  
Screening Process ◽  
Direct Laryngoscope ◽  
Normal Airway ◽  
Intubation Success Rate

Introduction: McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscope is a single-handed device designed to facilitate intubation in patients both in patients with normal airway conditions (without any complications) or airway conditions with complications such as cervical spine and/or anatomic abnormalities. Objective: This study aims to compare McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscope and direct laryngoscope using Macintosh blades as learning material or study simulators for medical personnel (including anesthesiologist and paramedics) and novice operator (medical students). Method: this study is a systematic review using the PRISMA method which was carried out systematically. Data was collected through Pubmed, direct science, EBSCOHost, and Proquest using the keywords ‘airway management ', ‘laryngoscopy', and 'manikin'. Journal included based on published publication time between 2008 and 2020, a study using SimMan Laerdal Airway manikin, a journal discussing intubation using McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscope and direct laryngoscope with Macintosh blades here, where it is normal airway (without complications) and difficult airway. Results: 1556 journals were collected through 4 journal search sites and then carried out a screening process for the publication year approved in 2008 to 2020. Four studies use adult manikin SimMan Laerdal Airway including 247 participants were included in this systematic review. Conclusion: Based on journals that have been reviewed, McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscope provides better and superior results compared to Macintosh in terms of the success rate and visualization of glottis. Also, the intubation time using McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscope is shorten compared to Macintosh both on the normal airway (without complication) and difficult airway. The participants (medical personnel and novice operators) in all studies that reviewed prefer to use McGrath® Mac videolaryngoscope instead of using direct laryngoscope with Macintosh blade for Endotracheal Intubation mainly used for learning or study simulators.

scholarly journals Comparison of Different Intubation Methods in Difficult Airways during Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Chest Compression: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Togay Evrin ◽  
Jacek Smereka ◽  
Damian Gorczyca ◽  
Szymon Bialka ◽  
Jerzy Robert Ladny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽  
Intubation Time ◽  
Intubation Success ◽  
Intubation Success Rate ◽  
Difficult Airways

Introduction. Airway management is one of key elements of resuscitation. Endotracheal intubation is still considered the gold standard for airway management during resuscitation. Aim. The aim of the study was to compare success rates and intubation time of different endotracheal intubation methods during emergency intubation with difficult airways in the conditions of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a standardized manikin model. Methods. The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, cross-over simulation study. It involved 46 paramedics with at least 5 years of experience in Emergency Medical Service. The participants performed endotracheal intubation under difficult airway conditions during continuous chest compression, implemented with the LUCAS3 chest compression system. Three methods of tracheal intubation were applied: (1) standard Macintosh laryngoscope without a bougie stylet; (2) standard laryngoscope and a standard bougie stylet; (3) standard laryngoscope and a new bougie stylet. Results. The overall intubation success rate was 100% in the standard bougie and new bougie groups and lower (86.9%) when no bougie stylet was used (P=0.028). The intubation success rate with the 1st attempt equalled 91.3% for the new bougie group, 73.9% for standard bougie, and only 23.9% in the no-bougie group. The median intubation time was shortest in the new bougie group, where it amounted to 29 s (interquartile range [IQR]: 25–38); the time equalled 38s (IQR:31–44.5) in the standard bougie group and 47.5s (IQR:36–58) in the no-bougie group. The ease of use was lowest in the no-bougie group (85, IQR:63–88), average in the standard bougie group (44, IQR:30–51), and highest in the new bougie stylet group (32, IQR:19–41). Conclusion. In this manikin-based study, paramedics were able to perform endotracheal intubation with higher efficacy and in a shorter time using the new bougie stylet as compared with the standard bougie stylet.

scholarly journals Should the Glidescope video laryngoscope be used first line for all oral intubations or only in those with a difficult airway? A review of current literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 322-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terrie-Marie Russell ◽  
Anil Hormis ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Difficult Airway ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽  
Review Literature ◽  
Video Laryngoscope ◽  
Intubation Time ◽  
First Line ◽  
Glottic View ◽  
Glidescope Video Laryngoscope ◽  
Difficult Airways

The purpose of this study was to review literature that looked into the efficacy of the Glidescope video laryngoscope versus the Macintosh laryngoscope in oral endotracheal intubations. We aimed to answer the question ‘Should the Glidescope video laryngoscope laryngoscopes be used as first line intubation aids or only in the difficult airway?’ A systematic search of electronic databases was made. The inclusion criteria included: Glidescope, video laryngoscope, and Macintosh laryngoscope in human studies. The study aimed to compare first attempt success rate, glottic view and intubation time in papers dating between 2009 and 2017. Eleven trials with a total of 7,919 patients with both difficult and normal airways were included. The trials showed an improvement in first attempt success rate and glottic view with the Glidescope video laryngoscope especially in those with difficult airways. Overall time to intubate showed no significant differences between the Glidescope video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope although it was identified that with increased training and experience with the Glidescope video laryngoscope, intubation time was reduced. Glidescope video laryngoscopes show advantages over the Macintosh laryngoscopes in obtaining better glottic views in those with difficult airways. However its use is not supported in all routine intubations.

scholarly journals Comparison of i-Gel as a Conduit for Intubation between under Fiberoptic Guidance and Blind Endotracheal Intubation during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Simulation Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Hyun Young Choi ◽  
Wonhee Kim ◽  
Yong Soo Jang ◽  
Gu Hyun Kang ◽  
Jae Guk Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Intubation Time ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Intubation Technique ◽  
Endotracheal Tubes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Hoc

Purpose. This study aimed to compare intubation performances among i-gel blind intubation (IGI), i-gel bronchoscopic intubation (IBRI), and intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL) applying two kinds of endotracheal tube during chest compressions. We hypothesized that IGI using wire-reinforced silicone (WRS) tube could achieve endotracheal intubation most rapidly and successfully. Methods. In 23 emergency physicians, a prospective randomized crossover manikin study was conducted to examine the three intubation techniques using two kinds of endotracheal tubes. The primary outcome was the intubation time. The secondary outcome was the cumulative success rate for each intubation technique. A significant difference was considered when identifying p<0.05 between two devices or p<0.017 in post hoc analysis of the comparison among three devices. Results. The mean intubation time using IGI was shorter (p<0.017) than that of using IBRI and MCL in both endotracheal tubes (17.6 vs. 29.3 vs. 20.2 in conventional polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tube; 14.6 vs. 27.4 vs. 19.9 in WRS tube; sec). There were no significant (p<0.05) differences between PVC and WRS tubes for each intubation technique. The intubation time to reach 100% cumulative success rate was also shorter in IGI (p<0.017) than that in IBRI and MCL in both PVC and WRS tubes. Conclusions. IGI was an equally successful and faster technique compared with IBRI or MCL regardless of the use of PVC or WRS tube. IGI might be an appropriate technique for emergent intubation by experienced intubators during chest compressions.

scholarly journals Comparison of GlideScope Videolaryngoscopy to Direct Laryngoscopy for Intubation of a Pediatric Simulator by Novice Physicians

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joni E. Rabiner ◽  
Marc Auerbach ◽  
Jeffrey R. Avner ◽  
Dina Daswani ◽  
Hnin Khine
Keyword(s):  
Crossover Study ◽  
Difficult Airway ◽  
Direct Laryngoscopy ◽  
Successful Intubation ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Normal Airway ◽  
Intubation Success ◽  
Mean Time ◽  
Randomized Crossover Study

Objective. To compare novice clinicians’ performance using GlideScope videolaryngoscopy (GVL) to direct laryngoscopy (DL).Methods. This was a prospective, randomized crossover study. Incoming pediatric interns intubated pediatric simulators in four normal and difficult airway scenarios with GVL and DL. Primary outcomes included time to intubation and rate of successful intubation. Interns rated their satisfaction of the devices and chose the preferred device.Results. Twenty-five interns were included. In the normal airway scenario, there were no differences in mean time for intubation with GVL or DL (61.4 versus 67.4 seconds, ) or number of successful intubations (19 versus 18, ). In the difficult airway scenario, interns took longer to intubate with GVL than DL (87.7 versus 61.3 seconds, ), but there were no differences in successful intubations (14 versus 15, ). There was a trend towards higher satisfaction for GVL than DL (7.3 versus 6.4, ), and GVL was chosen as the preferred device by a majority of interns (17/25, 68%).Conclusions. For novice clinicians, GVL does not improve time to intubation or intubation success rates in a pediatric simulator model of normal and difficult airway scenarios. Still, these novice clinicians overall preferred GVL.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Macintosh and Video Laryngoscopy Performed With a Prototype Rigid Anterior Commissure Laryngoscope by Experienced and Novice Users in a Manikin Model

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Price Sonkarley ◽  
Nilesh R. Vasan ◽  
Edward Kosik ◽  
Michael Anderson ◽  
Marvin Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Difficult Airway ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Anterior Commissure ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
User Preference ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Successful Intubation ◽  
Life Saving ◽  
Novice Users

Abstract Background. Intubation is a life-saving skill that can be difficult to learn and perform.Objective. The intubation time and user preference of four intubation techniques, performed by novices or experienced individuals, were compared.Methods. Enrolled participants were randomly assigned to one of four simulated intubation groups. Each group first performed intubation on the manikin airway without modifications (‘easy’ airway), followed by the same technique on a manikin with modifications to mimic a ‘difficult’ airway. The primary outcome measure was the time taken to inflate the manikin’s lungs with the bag ventilator, with successful intubation.Results. Ninety-eight participants were recruited and grouped according to experience: 59 novices (10 or fewer live intubations) and 39 experts (more than 10 live intubations). The total time to intubation increased significantly from the easy airway to the difficult airway for both expertise levels, and for all intubation techniques except the novel laryngoscope.Conclusion. Repeated exposure to multiple intubation devices can result in an adequate learning curve for the novice participant. The novel laryngoscope is an uncomplicated intubation tool; in this study, it provided novice users who intubate infrequently with a better chance of successful intubation in manikins.

scholarly journals A comparison of the force applied on oral structures during intubation attempts between the Pentax-AWS airwayscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope: a high-fidelity simulator-based study

BMJ Open ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (10) ◽  
pp. e006416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadahiro Goto ◽  
Yasuaki Koyama ◽  
Takashiro Kondo ◽  
Yusuke Tsugawa ◽  
Kohei Hasegawa
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Difficult Airway ◽  
Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽  
Maximum Force ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
Direct Laryngoscope ◽  
Normal Airway ◽  
Glottic View ◽  
Maxillary Incisors

ObjectiveWe sought to determine whether the use of Pentax-AWS Airwayscope (AWS) applied less force on oral structures during intubation attempts than a conventional direct laryngoscope (DL).DesignProspective cross-over study.ParticipantsA total of 37 physicians (9 transitional-year residents, 20 emergency medicine residents and 8 emergency physicians) were enrolled.InterventionsWe used four simulation scenarios according to the difficulty of intubation and devices and used a high-fidelity simulator to quantify the forces applied on the oral structures.Outcome measuresPrimary outcomes were the maximum force applied on the maxillary incisors and tongue. Other outcomes of interest were time to intubation and glottic view during intubation attempts.ResultsThe maximum force applied on the maxillary incisors in the normal airway scenario was higher with the use of AWS than that with DL (107 newton (N) vs 77 N, p=0.02). By contrast, the force in the difficult airway scenario was significantly lower with the use of AWS than that of the DL (89 N vs 183 N, p<0.01). Likewise, the force applied on the tongue was significantly lower with the use of AWS than the use of DL in both airway scenarios (11 N vs 27 N, p<0.001 in the normal airway scenario; 12 N vs 40 N, p<0.01 in the difficult airway scenario).ConclusionsThe use of AWS during intubation attempts was associated with decreased forces applied to oral structures in the simulated difficult airway scenario.

scholarly journals Impact of aerosol enclosure barrier to videolaryngoscopic oro-tracheal intubation: A pilot manikin study

2020 ◽  
pp. 102490792096530
Author(s):  
Hui Chun Fai ◽  
Li Alex ◽  
Wong Chi Keung Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Successful Intubation ◽  
Dental Injury ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Intubation Procedure

Background: Personal protective equipment used for protection of healthcare workers in the combat against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 pandemic is in limited supply worldwide at present – 2020. Use of barrier enclosure during endotracheal intubation can potentially act as a cost-effective adjunct to minimize risks of transmitting the infection to healthcare workers. However, there is concern that the enclosure itself will act as a barrier to the intubation procedure in the emergency settings. Objective: To evaluate the negative effect of barrier enclosure (an aerosol box) on the performance of video-assisted intubation in a manikin Methods: A total of 41 Emergency Department doctors from a local hospital were recruited to perform intubation in a manikin simulating normal and more difficult airways (Cormack-Lehane grades I and IIb) with and without the box. The primary outcome was time of successful intubation. The secondary outcomes were first-attempt success rate, number of successful attempts, need of adjuncts, dental injury and ease of intubation as perceived by the participants. Results: The aerosol box had no significant negative effect on the time of successful intubation (p = 0.630 (Grade I airway) and p = 0.436 (Grade IIb airway)), first-attempt success rate, number of successful attempts, need of adjuncts or dental injury. Participants subjectively reported extra yet minor challenges during intubation in the presence of the box. Conclusion: Within limits of the pilot study, the aerosol box had no statistical significant difference but an increasing trend of prolonged endotracheal intubation interval in the Grade IIb airway and negative impact on first-pass success, and could potentially be used to protect healthcare workers during the aerosol-generating intubation procedure.

scholarly journals Comparisons of the Pentax-AWS, Glidescope, and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Intubation Performance during Mechanical Chest Compressions in Left Lateral Tilt: A Randomized Simulation Study of Maternal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanghyun Lee ◽  
Wonhee Kim ◽  
Hyunggoo Kang ◽  
Jaehoon Oh ◽  
Tae Ho Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽  
Intubation Time ◽  
Lateral Tilt ◽  
Glottic View ◽  
Advanced Airway ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Maternal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Purpose. Rapid advanced airway management is important in maternal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). This study aimed to compare intubation performances among Pentax-AWS (AWS), Glidescope (GVL), and Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL) during mechanical chest compression in 15° and 30° left lateral tilt.Methods. In 19 emergency physicians, a prospective randomized crossover study was conducted to examine the three laryngoscopes. Primary outcomes were the intubation time and the success rate for intubation.Results. The median intubation time using AWS was shorter than that of GVL and MCL in both tilt degrees. The time to visualize the glottic view in GVL and AWS was significantly lower than that of MCL (allP<0.05), whereas there was no significant difference between the two video laryngoscopes (in 15° tilt,P=1; in 30° tilt,P=0.71). The progression of tracheal tube using AWS was faster than that of MCL and GVL in both degrees (allP<0.001). Intubations using AWS and GVL showed higher success rate than that of Macintosh laryngoscopes.Conclusions. The AWS could be an appropriate laryngoscope for airway management of pregnant women in tilt CPR considering intubation time and success rate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document