scholarly journals Performance and Clinical Utility of a Commercial von Willebrand Factor Collagen Binding Assay for Laboratory Diagnosis of von Willebrand Disease

2006 ◽  
Vol 52 (10) ◽  
pp. 1965-1967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Popov ◽  
Olga Zhukov ◽  
Susan Ruden ◽  
Terry Zeschmann ◽  
Anthony Sferruzza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Assay ◽  
Binding Capacity ◽  
Laboratory Diagnosis ◽  
Von Willebrand Disease ◽  
Collagen Binding ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Ristocetin Cofactor ◽  
Probable Type

Abstract Background: Von Willebrand disease (VWD) diagnosis and classification usually require a combination of nonspecific and VW-factor (VWF)-specific assays. We evaluated the analytical performance of a commercially available collagen-binding assay (CBA) and its usefulness in conjunction with other assays for laboratory diagnosis of VWD. Methods: We used a commercial CBA ELISA (Life Technologies) to evaluate 3085 plasma samples. We used standard procedures to perform other assays, including factor VIII activity (FVIII:C), VWF antigen (VWF:Ag), ristocetin cofactor activity, VWF collagen binding capacity (VWF:CB), and VWF multimeric analysis. Results: CBA intra- and interassay CVs were <6% and <13%, respectively. Reference intervals were 45%–198% for VWF:CB and 0.75–1.32 for the VWF:CB/Ag ratio. Of 3085 samples tested, 235 (8%) had results commonly associated with VWD. Multimer analysis and phenotypic data in 156 samples identified VWD types as: 91 (58%) type 1, 62 (40%) type 2, and 3 (2%) type 3. Of the 91 type 1 samples, proportional decreases in functional activity were seen in 75 samples (82%) according to CBA and in 63 samples (69%) according to the ristocetin cofactor assay. Of the type 2 samples, 10 were further identified as probable type 2A, 26 as probable type 2B, 12 as probable type 2M, and 14 could not be subtyped. VWF:CBA/Ag ratios <0.5 occurred in 83% of VWD type 2A and 2B samples, indicating characteristic functional discordance. Mean (SD) VWF:CB values were significantly higher in individuals without group O blood [113 (45)] than in those with group O blood [83 (32)] (t-test, P = 0.007). Conclusions: The commercial CBA assay produces reliable results and is useful for laboratory diagnosis of VWD.

Desmopressin parenteral bei VWD 1, VWD 2A und Thrombozytopathie

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (S 01) ◽  
pp. S29-S33 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Pollmann ◽  
B. Siegmund
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Disease Type ◽  
Von Willebrand Disease ◽  
Occlusion Time ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Willebrand Factor ◽  
Ristocetin Cofactor

SummaryDesmopressin (DDAVP, Minirin® parenteral), which induces the release of von-Willebrand factor from endogenous stores, is indicated in von Willebrand disease type 1 (VWD 1). In the present study effectiveness of DDAVP was tested and side effects were recorded in patients with VWD 1, von Willebrand disease type 2 (VWD 2) or thrombocytopathy (TCP). Patients, methods Subjects were analysed prior to and after Minirin parenteral infusion (0.4 μg/kg body weight (b.w.) over 60 minutes) for partial thromboplastin time (PTT, seconds), ADP/epinephrine triggered plateletfunction analyzer (PFA-100) occlusion time (seconds), factor VIII activity (FVIII, %), VWF as ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo, %) and VWF antigen (VWF:Ag, %). Side effects of DDAVP during operative interventions were recorded per questionnaires by the patients. Results The mean ± standard deviation dose (n = 165 patients) of Minirin parenteral administered was 0.37 ± 0.02 μg/kg b.w., most often upcoming dental operations (57%) necessitated testing. Coagulation parameters of patients with VWD 1 or TCP normalised in almost all patients, but only in approximately 50% of patients with VWD 2 respectively. Appraisal of effectiveness of Minirin parenteral as good was 96% in case of VWD 1 and 95 % in case of TCP. During minor surgeries (n = 23) in 91% of the patients no complications and in 2 patients (9%) postoperative haemorrhages without need for further interventions occurred, but 83% of the patients reported adverse reactions in the questionnaires, although Minirin parenteral was well tolerated by all patients during DDAVP efficacy tests. Conclusion Desmopressin is well tolerated and affective in patients with VWD 1 and thrombocytopathy.

Laboratory diagnosis of von Willebrand disease

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (04) ◽  
pp. 203-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Schneppenheim ◽  
J. Patzke
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Diagnosis ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Von Willebrand Disease ◽  
Activity Assay ◽  
Binding Assays ◽  
New Type ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Made In

SummaryOver the last decade, considerable progress has been made in the laboratory diagnosis of VWD. Precise, sensitive and automated VWF : Ag assays became widely available. The VWF : RCo performance was improved to a certain degree. However, the sensitivity, precision and general availability of automated applications is not yet optimal. Nevertheless, this type of assay is still recognized as superior to other activity assays, e. g. VWF : CBA assays and antibody-binding “activity” assays, for the detection of defects in VWF function.A decision limit of either 30 or 40 IU dl-1 VWF (VWF:RCo or VWF:Ag) is recommended for a diagnosis of type 1 VWD. Type 2 VWD can be differentiated from type 1 by calculating the VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratio.Improved and easier to perform multimer analysis and genetic testing are beginning to facilitate the diagnosis of the VWD type 1, 2A, 2B, 2N, 2M or 3. Within type 1 or 2, a decreased VWF survival can be detected by the VWFpp assay and its ratio to VWF : Ag.A new type of VWF activity assay, based on the binding of VWF to a GPIb〈-fragment, has been developed. One assay variant does not need ristocetin as a cofactor anymore. The performance investigations presented so far are very promising. It is probable that these GPIb〈-binding assays will detect functional VWF defects as the VWF : RCo assay, but are much more sensitive and precise. Fully automated applications on routine analyzers are expected to be commercialized soon.

von Willebrand Disease in a Pediatric-based Population - Comparison of Type 1 Diagnostic Criteria and Use of the PFA-100® and a von Willebrand Factor/Collagen-binding Assay

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (09) ◽  
pp. 401-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. Dean ◽  
V. S. Blanchette ◽  
M. D. Carcao ◽  
A. M. Stain ◽  
C. R. Sparling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Von Willebrand Factor ◽  
Screening Test ◽  
Binding Assay ◽  
Von Willebrand Disease ◽  
Consensus Guidelines ◽  
Collagen Binding ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Willebrand Factor

SummaryDefinitive diagnosis of type 1 von Willebrand Disease (VWD) remains a problem. Provisional consensus guidelines for the diagnosis of definite and possible type 1 VWD were prepared by the Scientific Subcommittee on von Willebrand factor (VWF) of the Scientific and Standardization Committee (SSC) of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) during the 1996 annual meeting for the specific purpose of further evaluation in retrospective and prospective studies by a Working Party on Diagnostic Criteria (1996 Annual Report of the SSC/ISTH Subcommittee on VWF). In the first phase of this study, we compared 2 definitions of type 1 VWD, each with 3 criteria: significant bleeding history, laboratory investigations, and family history. Using the ISTH consensus guidelines for type 1 VWD definition, significantly fewer patients were diagnosed with definite type 1 disease as compared to our “in house” Hospital for Sick Children (HSC) criteria (4 vs. 31). While we recognize that the provisional ISTH consensus guidelines were not intended for clinical use, we believe that the results of our studies are of interest and will assist in any future refinements to the ISTH guidelines.In the second phase of this study, we investigated the utility of 2 new tests, a laboratory screening test and a functional test, for VWD in our well characterized, pediatric-based population. The Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100®) provides an in vitro measure of primary hemostasis under conditions of high shear, using disposable cartridges containing collagen and either epinephrine or ADP. All tested subjects with types 2 or 3 VWD had prolonged PFA-100 closure times (CTs) with both cartridge types (n = 17) and prolonged bleeding times (n = 14). In subjects with definite type 1 VWD, 20/24 (83%) had prolonged CTs with the collagen/ADP cartridge (19/24 (79%) with collagen/epinephrine), compared with 7/26 (27%) with prolonged bleeding times. In subjects with definite types 1, 2, or 3 VWD, collagen/ADP CTs were abnormal in 37/41 subjects, giving an overall sensitivity of 90%. With this high sensitivity, the PFA-100 is a better screening test for VWD than the bleeding time.We also tested a VWF collagen-binding assay (VWF:CBA) as a functional test for VWF, in comparison with the more routinely-used ristocetin cofactor assay (VWF:RCo). The VWF:CBA is based on an ELISA technique, which has the potential to be more reproducible than the VWF:RCo. We found that the VWF:CBA detected 43/49 (88%) subjects with definite types 1, 2, or 3 VWD, performing as well as the VWF:RCo, that detected 42/48 (88%). We also showed that, used in conjunction with VWF antigen levels, the VWF:CBA may be useful in classification of VWD subtypes.

Evaluation of commercial von Willebrand factor collagen binding assays to assist the discrimination of types 1 and 2 von Willebrand disease

2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1009-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Favaloro
Keyword(s):  
Von Willebrand Factor ◽  
Von Willebrand Disease ◽  
Binding Assays ◽  
Collagen Binding ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Willebrand Factor ◽  
Ristocetin Cofactor ◽  
Control Samples

SummaryThis study reports on the evaluation of seven commercial von Wille-brand factor (VWF) collagen binding (VWF:CB) assays to potentially assist the discrimination of types 1 and 2 von Willebrand disease (VWD). Samples from 25 patients with type 1 VWD, of varying severity, were co-tested with 16 samples from patients with types 2A or 2B VWD, plus various control samples, using each commercial VWF:CB assay assessed against our standard (reference) in-house VWF:CB assay, as well as our in-house VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) and ristocetin cofactor (VWF:RCo) assays. Commercial VWF:CB assays varied in their ability to discriminate types 1 and 2A/2B VWD. The optimal VWF:CB/VWF:Ag ratio at which optimal discrimination occurred also differed between assays, with some improvements observed with some (but not all) as-says following a harmonisation process that aimed to correct for different calibrator effects. Assay variability also compromised assay utility in some test occasions. Future standardisation and improvements in some commercial VWF:CB assays are needed before the VWF:CB assay can be more fully and globally utilised for discrimination of VWD types in diagnostic laboratories.

Toward Personalized Treatment for Patients with Low von Willebrand Factor and Quantitative von Willebrand Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (02) ◽  
pp. 192-200
Author(s):  
James S. O'Donnell
Keyword(s):  
Von Willebrand Factor ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Von Willebrand Disease ◽  
Personalized Treatment ◽  
Treatment Plans ◽  
Type 3 ◽  
Von Willebrand ◽  
Willebrand Factor

AbstractThe biological mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of type 2 and type 3 von Willebrand disease (VWD) have been studied extensively. In contrast, although accounting for the majority of VWD cases, the pathobiology underlying partial quantitative VWD has remained somewhat elusive. However, important insights have been attained following several recent cohort studies that have investigated mechanisms in patients with type 1 VWD and low von Willebrand factor (VWF), respectively. These studies have demonstrated that reduced plasma VWF levels may result from either (1) decreased VWF biosynthesis and/or secretion in endothelial cells and (2) pathological increased VWF clearance. In addition, it has become clear that some patients with only mild to moderate reductions in plasma VWF levels in the 30 to 50 IU/dL range may have significant bleeding phenotypes. Importantly in these low VWF patients, bleeding risk fails to correlate with plasma VWF levels and inheritance is typically independent of the VWF gene. Although plasma VWF levels may increase to > 50 IU/dL with progressive aging or pregnancy in these subjects, emerging data suggest that this apparent normalization in VWF levels does not necessarily equate to a complete correction in bleeding phenotype in patients with partial quantitative VWD. In this review, these recent advances in our understanding of quantitative VWD pathogenesis are discussed. Furthermore, the translational implications of these emerging findings are considered, particularly with respect to designing personalized treatment plans for VWD patients undergoing elective procedures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document