Advanced Lipoprotein Testing by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and Carotid Ultrasound Predict Premature Coronary Heart Disease

CHEST Journal ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 124 (4) ◽  
pp. 150S
Author(s):  
Kwame O. Akosah ◽  
Ana M. Schaper ◽  
Vicki L. McHugh ◽  
Sharon I. Barnhart
2010 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 789-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit J Arsenault ◽  
Isabelle Lemieux ◽  
Jean-Pierre Després ◽  
Nicholas J Wareham ◽  
Erik SG Stroes ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Gradient gel electrophoresis (GGE) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy are both widely accepted methods for measuring LDL and HDL particle size. However, whether or not GGE- or NMR-measured LDL or HDL particle size predicts coronary heart disease (CHD) risk to a similar extent is currently unknown. Methods: We used GGE and NMR to measure LDL and HDL particle size in a nested case-control study of 1025 incident cases of CHD and 1915 controls from the EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition)-Norfolk study. The study sample included apparently healthy men and women age 45–79 years followed for an average of 6 years. Results: Pearson correlation coefficients showed that the overall agreement between NMR and GGE was better for the measurement of HDL size (r = 0.78) than for LDL size (r = 0.47). The odds ratio for future CHD among participants in the bottom tertile of LDL size (smallest LDL particles) was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.12–1.63) for GGE and 1.74 (1.41–2.15) for NMR. For HDL size, these respective odds ratios were 1.41 (1.16–1.72) and 1.85 (1.47–2.32). After adjustment for potential confounders, the relationship between small LDL or HDL particles and CHD was no longer significant, irrespective of the method. Conclusions: In this prospective population study, we found that the relationships between NMR-measured LDL and HDL sizes and CHD risk were slightly higher than those obtained with GGE.


Circulation ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 523-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
C B Higgins ◽  
P Lanzer ◽  
D Stark ◽  
E Botvinick ◽  
N B Schiller ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (12) ◽  
pp. 2078-2085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon R Thompson ◽  
Pamela A McCaskie ◽  
John P Beilby ◽  
Joseph Hung ◽  
Michelle Jennens ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Interleukin (IL)-18 is a proinflammatory cytokine that has been implicated in several diseases, including atherosclerosis, and increased circulating IL-18 concentrations increase risk of future coronary heart disease (CHD). We evaluated the effect of common variation within the IL18 gene on concentrations of circulating IL-18. Methods: We measured IL-18, by ELISA, in the population-based study group [Carotid Ultrasound Disease Assessment Study (CUDAS)] and a predominantly male cohort with premature cardiovascular disease [Carotid Ultrasound in Patients with Ischaemic Heart Disease (CUPID)]. Using a tagging single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) approach that captured >90% of genetic variation, we identified 4 common (>10%) haplotypes. Results: A common SNP was associated with differences in IL-18 concentrations; in CUDAS individuals carrying 2 copies of the rare allele, concentrations were 13% higher than in those with no copies (P = 0.002). Haplotypes were also associated with significant differences in IL-18 concentrations in CUDAS and CUPID. Haplotype GTATA (frequency 23%) was associated with significantly lower IL-18 than others. In CUDAS, those carrying 2 copies had IL-18 concentrations 15% lower than those carrying no copies (P = 0.002); in CUPID, the difference was 22% (P = 0.004). These associations remained significant after adjustment for age, sex, hypertension, HDL cholesterol, waist-to-hip ratio, and alcohol consumption. Despite being associated with differences in IL-18 concentrations, the haplotypes did not occur at different frequencies in those with or without carotid atherosclerotic plaques. Conclusions: Variation within IL18 affects IL-18 concentrations in healthy and diseased individuals and thus may influence the pathophysiology of plaques at all stages of CHD progression.


Author(s):  
M.J. Hennessy ◽  
E. Kwok

Much progress in nuclear magnetic resonance microscope has been made in the last few years as a result of improved instrumentation and techniques being made available through basic research in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technologies for medicine. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) was first observed in the hydrogen nucleus in water by Bloch, Purcell and Pound over 40 years ago. Today, in medicine, virtually all commercial MRI scans are made of water bound in tissue. This is also true for NMR microscopy, which has focussed mainly on biological applications. The reason water is the favored molecule for NMR is because water is,the most abundant molecule in biology. It is also the most NMR sensitive having the largest nuclear magnetic moment and having reasonable room temperature relaxation times (from 10 ms to 3 sec). The contrast seen in magnetic resonance images is due mostly to distribution of water relaxation times in sample which are extremely sensitive to the local environment.


Author(s):  
Paul C. Lauterbur

Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging can reach microscopic resolution, as was noted many years ago, but the first serious attempt to explore the limits of the possibilities was made by Hedges. Resolution is ultimately limited under most circumstances by the signal-to-noise ratio, which is greater for small radio receiver coils, high magnetic fields and long observation times. The strongest signals in biological applications are obtained from water protons; for the usual magnetic fields used in NMR experiments (2-14 tesla), receiver coils of one to several millimeters in diameter, and observation times of a number of minutes, the volume resolution will be limited to a few hundred or thousand cubic micrometers. The proportions of voxels may be freely chosen within wide limits by varying the details of the imaging procedure. For isotropic resolution, therefore, objects of the order of (10μm) may be distinguished.Because the spatial coordinates are encoded by magnetic field gradients, the NMR resonance frequency differences, which determine the potential spatial resolution, may be made very large. As noted above, however, the corresponding volumes may become too small to give useful signal-to-noise ratios. In the presence of magnetic field gradients there will also be a loss of signal strength and resolution because molecular diffusion causes the coherence of the NMR signal to decay more rapidly than it otherwise would. This phenomenon is especially important in microscopic imaging.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document