scholarly journals Food allergies in children: a comparison of parental reports and skin prick test results

2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 59-65
Author(s):  
Camilia Metadea Aji Savitri ◽  
Azwin Mengindra Putera Lubis ◽  
Gatot Soegiarto
Keyword(s):  
Skin Prick Test ◽  
Skin Prick Testing ◽  
Food Allergies ◽  
P Value ◽  
Positive Skin Prick Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Prick Test ◽  
Parental Reports

Background Food allergy is common in children and its prevalence is generally on the rise. Imprecise parental reports about reactions to particular foods can lead to unnecessary restrictions. Since children have specific growth requirements, such nutritional restrictions may have disturbing effects on children’s growth and development.Objective To compare parental reports on food reactions to skin prick test results in their children.Method Retrospective, cross sectional study using patient’s medical record data during one-year study period. Data were analyzed manually and statistically, to assess the degree of agreement (Kappa’s coefficient) and significance (P).Results We collected data from 154 subjects aged 0-18 years. For every allergen assessed, parents reported more food reactions than positive skin prick test results. Allergy incidence were caused, in order, by cow’s milk and chicken (25.3%), eggs (22.1%), chocolate (20.1%), fruits (14.3%), seafood (13%), and saltwater fish (1.9%). Kappa coefficient are all poor (<0.2) and P value are all >0.05 except for chicken (P=0.02).Conclusion Most parents tend to overestimate which food cause reactions in their children, as reactions reported were not necessarily allergenic. Therefore, every patient experiencing allergy reactions should undergo skin prick testing to confirm the possibility of allergy.

scholarly journals Cross-reactivity in Skin Prick Test Results of Members Within Pooideae Subfamily

OTO Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 2473974X2098656
Author(s):  
Brette C. Harding ◽  
Brian P. Kinealy ◽  
Christine B. Franzese
Keyword(s):  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Skin Prick Test ◽  
Skin Prick Testing ◽  
Cross Reactivity ◽  
Positive Skin Prick Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Prick Test ◽  
Timothy Grass ◽  
Representative Member

Objective Molecular similarities of grass pollen antigens have led to the view that cross-reactivity exists within members of the Pooideae subfamily of grasses. This has resulted in testing for only the most antigenically representative member of Pooideae, Timothy grass ( Phleum pratense), despite little literature to support the claim that Phleum is the most representative member or that in vitro cross-reactivity correlates with in vivo cross-reactivity. The aim of the study was to determine if patients with allergic rhinitis symptoms and positive skin prick test results to meadow fescue ( Festuca pratensis) also have positive results to Timothy grass. Study Design Retrospective cross-sectional study. Setting Tertiary care center in middle Missouri. Methods A retrospective chart review identified patients ≥12 years old with a diagnosis of allergic rhinitis who underwent skin prick testing between March 2016 and July 2018, by using a search with CPT code 95004 ( Current Procedural Terminology). Positive skin prick test results were based on wheal produced ≥3 mm than the negative control. Results After review of 2182 charts, 1587 patients met criteria to test for Phleum and Festuca. In total, 1239 patients had a positive result for Phleum or Festuca. Of these, 479 (38.6%) tested positive for Festuca alone, while 342 (27.6%) and 418 (33.7%) tested positive for Phleum alone and Phleum+ Festuca, respectively. Conclusion Clinical cross-reactivity among Pooideae members may not be as complete as traditionally thought. P pratense may not be the most antigenically representative subfamily member, and other grasses may need to be included in skin prick testing.

scholarly journals Study of common aeroallergens in children with wheeze: a hospital based cross sectional study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 1971
Author(s):  
Kalavathy Jasmine Masillamoni ◽  
Nayantara R. Gandra
Keyword(s):  
Skin Prick Test ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Intradermal Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Positive Skin Prick Test ◽  
Indoor Allergens ◽  
Observation Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Prick Test

Background: Prevention of diseases of the allergic origin depends upon the early identification of aeroallergens. Vaccine for allergy may not be required in all cases. but when treatment is not successful, then there is requirement of the vaccine. Objective of study allergens responsible for inducing recurrent wheezingMethods: A cross sectional observation study was carried out at Departmetn of Pediatric, Shadan Institue of Medical Sciences, Peerancheru, Hyderabad, Telangana, India from June 2017 to June 2018 among 100 children with recurrent (4 or more episodes of wheezing in past one year) ages between 2 yrs to 10 yrs. Using the guidelines for skin prick test as per the European committee, the skin prick test was carried out. Insulin syringe was used for the intradermal test. It is done using standardized allergen extracts (Creative Diagnostic Medicare pvt ltd) were done for our cases.Results: Out of 100 children studied, 67 children were found to be sensitive to at least one of the aeroallergen and 33 children were found to be negative for all the aeroallergens. A statistically significant correlation is seen between the age groups and sensitivity (p value 0.025). Out of 67 children with a positive skin prick test, 66 children showed the sensitivity to indoor allergens. The association between the indoor allergens and the wheezing is statistically significant (P value <0.0001)Conclusion: In children the sensitivity to indoor allergens is more prevalent than sensitivity to outdoor allergens. Sensitivity to pollen was found in older children more than 5 years of age.

Atopy and Quality of Life in Pediatric Chronic Rhinosinusitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 586-590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anamika Anamika ◽  
Arunabha Chakravarti ◽  
Raj Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Skin Prick Test ◽  
Chronic Rhinosinusitis ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Endoscopic Examination ◽  
Positive Skin Prick Test ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Prick Test

Background Atopy has been suggested in the development of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), as allergic rhinitis (AR) is common coexisting disease in pediatric and adult patients with CRS. The contribution of AR to CRS is less clear till date. Objectives The objectives of this study were to determine atopic profile of children with CRS and impact of atopic status on disease severity and quality of life. Methods One hundred ten patients, aged between 7 and 18 years of age, diagnosed with CRS based on history, detailed clinical examination including nasal endoscopic examination were included in this cross-sectional study. Scoring of CRS was done according to Lund Mackay Endoscopic Appearance Score. Patients underwent skin prick test against 65 common aeroallergens (1:10 w/v, 50% glycerinated) for evidence of atopy. SN-5 Sinus and Nasal Quality of Life Survey was used to assess the quality of life in the study subjects. Results Positive skin prick test to at least one of the common aeroallergens was present in 58 (52.7%) patients. Most common aeroallergen sensitivity was seen with insects in 48 (43.6%) patients. Patients of CRS with atopy had higher mean Lund Mackay endoscopic score and SN-5 score than nonatopic patients which was statistically significant. Conclusion In conclusion, we recommend that testing for aeroallergen sensitivity and assessment of quality of life should be included in the protocol for diagnosis and management of pediatric patients with CRS. Early diagnosis and treatment of allergy may halt the progression of CRS and also the development of asthma and other allergic multimorbid disorders.

Maternal positive skin prick test results and asthma prediction after early childhood wheezing

2007 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 540-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnon Elizur ◽  
Noam Pollack ◽  
Sarah E. Boslaugh ◽  
Yakar Kannai ◽  
Yitzhak Katz
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Skin Prick Test ◽  
Positive Skin Prick Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Prick Test

scholarly journals Prevalence and associated factors of airway hyper- responsiveness in children with recurrent chronic cough

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 181 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Gusti Agung Ngurah Sugitha Adnyana ◽  
Putu Suwendra ◽  
Hendra Santoso
Keyword(s):  
Skin Prick Test ◽  
Passive Smoking ◽  
Chronic Cough ◽  
Associated Factors ◽  
Positive Skin Prick Test ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Cough Variant Asthma ◽  
Prick Test ◽  
History Of

Background Airway hyper-responsiveness (AH) is a common char-acteristic of asthma. Patient who has recurrent chronic cough withAH is commonly referred as “cough variant asthma”. Histamineprovocation test should be performed to determine whether a pa-tient has “cough variant asthma” or recurrent viral bronchitis.Objective To determine AH prevalence in children with recurrentchronic cough and factors associated with it.Methods A cross sectional study was conducted on 6-12 year-oldchildren with recurrent chronic cough at the Pediatrics OutpatientClinic, Sanglah Hospital Denpasar from September 2002 until June2003Results Twenty one out of 64 (33%) subjects suffering from recur-rent chronic cough without wheezing had AH. Associated factorssignificantly associated with AH were age, allergic rhinitis, pater-nal and maternal history of atopy, passive smoking, use of mos-quito-coil, positive skin prick test, and eosinophilia. Spearman cor-relation analysis between associated factors and AH showed thatpositive skin prick test and passive smoking were moderately cor-related with AH (r=0.56, p<0.0001; r=0.57, p<0.0001, respectively),whereas multivariate regression logistic analysis on associatedfactors found true associated factors, such as positive skin pricktest (p=0.01; OR=14.82), history of atopy in father (p=0.02;OR=22.75), and passive smoking (p=0.03; OR=11.97).Conclusions The prevalence of airway hyper-responsiveness inchildren with recurrent chronic cough without history of wheezingwas 33%. Independent associated factors of AH in recurrent chroniccough children are positive skin prick test, history of atopy in fa-ther, and passive smoking

scholarly journals Comparison of skin prick allergy test in urban and rural children

2011 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Fakhri Widyanto ◽  
Rita Evalina Rusli ◽  
Muhammad Ali ◽  
Melda Deliana ◽  
Lily Irsa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Skin Prick Test ◽  
House Dust ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
House Dust Mites ◽  
Rural Children ◽  
Positive Skin Prick Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Prick Test ◽  
Allergy Test

Background Children who grow up in rural areas have a lower incidence of atopy and other allergic manifestations than children in urban areas. Several recent studies have suggested that agricultural exposure may protect children from developing asthma and atopy, but these findings are inconsistent.Objective To examine an association between living in rural or urban areas and skin prick allergy test results in children and to detennine associated risk factors for atopy.Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study in Karo district (rural) and Medan (urban) in October-December 2009. We enrolled primary school children who had a history of atopy in their families. Skin prick testing was done on the volar side of the forearm and included eight aero-allergens: house dust mites, house dust, cotton, chicken feathers, cat dander, cockroaches, mould, and pollen. We analyzed the folloMng risk factors forassociation Mth atopy: tobacco smoke, pets, livestock exposure, and having older sibling(s).Results We recruited 49 children from the Karo district and 52 children from the city of Medan. There were significant associations between living in an urban area and positive skin prick test results for house dust mites and house dust compared to living in a rural area (P=0.04, 95% CI: 1.11 to 5.91; P=0.04, 95% CI: 1.13 to 12.45, respectively). The reverse was true for cockroach allergens (P=0.02, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.81). Tobacco smoke and livestock exposure were associated Mth negative skin prick test results in rural children (P=O.03, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.81 and P=0.002, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.42, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that lack of livestock exposure was the major risk factor associated Mth any positive skin prick test results in rural children (P=0.004; 95% CI ; 0.02 to 0.49).Conclusion There were differing associations between living in rural and urban areas to various skin prick test results in children. Lack of livestock exposure was the risk factor associated with positive skin prick test results in rural children.

scholarly journals Cefuroxime-induced anaphylaxis with prominent central nervous system manifestations: A case report

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 1010-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianqing Gu ◽  
Shuang Liu ◽  
Yuxiang Zhi
Keyword(s):  
Skin Prick Test ◽  
Drug Hypersensitivity ◽  
Generation Cephalosporin ◽  
Skin Tests ◽  
Positive Skin Prick Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Positive Skin ◽  
Multiple Systems ◽  
Prick Test

Cefuroxime is a second-generation cephalosporin antibiotic that causes immediate hypersensitivity reactions, ranging from mild urticaria to severe anaphylactic shock. Anaphylactic reactions typically involve multiple systems, most notably, the skin and the respiratory and cardiovascular systems. Here, we report the unusual case of a patient who presented with oral cefuroxime-induced anaphylaxis with prominent neurologic manifestations. To identify the drug responsible for the anaphylaxis, we performed skin tests. Based on positive skin-prick test results, the diagnosis of cefuroxime-induced anaphylaxis was confirmed. Therefore, we suggest that clinicians should consider the possibility of a drug-induced anaphylactic reaction when neurologic but not cutaneous symptoms are present. The skin-prick test is a safe and useful diagnostic tool to confirm this kind of immediate drug hypersensitivity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document