scholarly journals Investigation of Neoplastic Cells in the Bone Marrow of Female Dogs with Mammary Gland Tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-22
Author(s):  
Talita B. Corsini ◽  
Paulo H. L. Bertolo ◽  
Júlio E. H. Monteiro ◽  
Gabriela P. Lima ◽  
Letícia Bonato ◽  
...  

Background The mammary glands are the second most common tumor development site in female dogs. One of the ways of staging such tumors is to evaluate the presence or absence of distant metastasis, including in bone marrow. Such findings in human medicine are associated with poor survival of women with breast tumors. However, in veterinary medicine, this clinical staging is used more for patients with lymphomas and mastocytomas. Studies using bone marrow biopsies as a staging method for mammary tumors are scarce. Objectives The present study was to evaluate mammary lesions and bone marrow in 23 female dogs, searching for disseminated tumor cells or metastatic foci. Results: Grade I carcinoma in mixed tumors was the type most observed (22.4%), and there was no statistical difference in relation to tumor size or presence of metastasis in lymph nodes. In the bone marrow of one female dog with carcinosarcoma (4.35%), there was cytoplasmic marking of a probable disseminated tumor cell of epithelial origin, and immunohistochemical evaluation showed presence of cytokeratin-19 antibodies. None of the female dogs presenting reduced cellularity or medullary fibrosis, confirmed through Masson’s trichrome technique, had cell marking in immunohistochemical analyses. Conclusions Bone marrow evaluation can be used as a staging method for mammary gland tumors in female dogs, since disseminated tumor cells present the potential to become secondary lesions and to disseminate to distant foci, thereby causing tertiary metastases over an indeterminate period of time.

2006 ◽  
Vol 66 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Fehm ◽  
S Becker ◽  
MJ Banys ◽  
G Becker-Pergola ◽  
S Duerr-Stoerzer ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 1549-1556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorothea Weckermann ◽  
Bernhard Polzer ◽  
Thomas Ragg ◽  
Andreas Blana ◽  
Günter Schlimok ◽  
...  

Purpose The outcome of prostate cancer is highly unpredictable. To assess the dynamics of systemic disease and to identify patients at high risk for early relapse we followed the fate of disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow for up to 10 years and genetically analyzed such cells isolated at various stages of disease. Patients and Methods Nine hundred bone marrow aspirates from 384 patients were stained using the monoclonal antibody A45-B/B3 directed against cytokeratins 8, 18, and 19. Log-rank statistics and Cox regression analysis were applied to determine the prognostic impact of positive cells detected before surgery (244 patients) and postoperatively (214 patients). Samples from primary tumors (n = 55) and single disseminated tumor cells (n = 100) were analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization. Results Detection of cytokeratin-positive cells before surgery was the strongest independent risk factor for metastasis within 48 months (P < .001; relative risk [RR], 5.5; 95% CI, 2.4 to 12.9). In contrast, cytokeratin-positive cells detected 6 months to 10 years after radical prostatectomy were consistently present in bone marrow with a prevalence of approximately 20% but had no influence on disease outcome. Characteristic genotypes of cytokeratin-positive cells were selected at manifestation of metastasis. Conclusion Cytokeratin-positive cells in the bone marrow of prostate cancer patients are only prognostically relevant when detected before surgery. Because we could not identify significant genetic differences between pre- and postoperatively isolated tumor cells before manifestation of metastasis, we postulate the existence of perioperative stimuli that activate disseminated tumor cells. Patients with cytokeratin-positive cells in bone marrow before surgery may therefore benefit from adjuvant therapies.


Lung Cancer ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 229-230
Author(s):  
U. Seifart ◽  
S. Henrich ◽  
G. Jaques ◽  
C. Loechelt ◽  
A. Wachtel ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Noack ◽  
M. Schmitt ◽  
J. Bauer ◽  
D. Helmecke ◽  
W. Krüger ◽  
...  

At the time of primary therapy (surgery, systemic chemotherapy and/or radiation), disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow can be found in almost one-third of patients with cancer of the breast, ovary, esophagus, stomach, colon, and other solid tumors. Whereas the prognostic impact of the mere presence of these cells is still a matter of debate, it has been shown that expression of tumor-associated antigens in disseminated tumor cells is linked to more aggressive disease. Therefore, further characterization of disseminated tumor cells at the protein and gene level has become increasingly important. To date, the most common detection method for disseminated tumor cells in the bone marrow is an immunocytochemical approach using cytokeratin-directed antibodies for detection of epithelial cells and the APAAP system for their visualization. We have established a new double immunofluorescence technique enabling simultaneous detection, phenotyping, and antigen quantification of disseminated tumor cells. Mononuclear cells from bone marrow are enriched by Ficoll gradient centrifugation and cytospins are prepared. Double immunofluorescence is performed using antibodies against cytokeratins 8/18/19 (mAb A45B/B3) and the uPA receptor CD87 (pAb HU277). CD87 expression is recorded by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) using fluorescence labeled latex beads as the reference; staining intensities of all the scans are then summed and quantified (extended focus). This protocol, originally designed for disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow, can also be applied to disseminated tumor cells in blood, to leukapheresis cells or to cells present in malignant ascites or other malignant effusions. The tumor cells detected may be used for gene and mRNA analyses. Furthermore, disseminated tumor cells also represent interesting targets for clinical studies on patient prognosis or prediction of therapy response as well as for specific tumor-biological therapies.


Oncotarget ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (43) ◽  
pp. 69794-69803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth C. Valkenburg ◽  
Sarah R. Amend ◽  
James E. Verdone ◽  
Emma E. van der Toom ◽  
James R. Hernandez ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document