Abstract
Introduction
Infectious endocarditis (IE) represents one of the main causes of morbimortality in patients (pts) with valvular heart disease. Prosthetic valves infection is usually associated with worse outcomes.
Aim
To compare the clinical features and adverse outcomes of patients with native vs prosthetic valve IE.
Methods
We analysed a population with suspected/confirmed IE, according to Duke criteria, in the last 12 years (2006-2017). The clinical and imaging data were collected as well as complication rates and mortality data.
Results
174 pts, 75% males with mean age of 61 ± 16 years. Native valve EI occurred in 74,1%. of pts. 25,3% had heart failure (HF), 16,1% chronic kidney disease(7,1% on haemodialysis), 12,8% HIV infection, 9,3% active neoplasm and 7,1% were on immunosuppression. 16 pts with native valve disease had previous valvular disease: 1 congenital valve disease, 2 with rheumatic heart disease, 3 with previous IE and 10 with degenerative disease. At admission: 73,1% had fever, 53,2% murmur and 47,9% anemia. The majority (78,4%) had single valve IE and 15,8% had double valve involvement. Aortic valve (AoV) was affected in 54% of the cases and mitral valve involvement was seen in 43,7%. 13,3% had right valve disease. S. Aureus was the most frequent microrganism. Echocardiographic findings: 87,7% had vegetation, 21,2% valve destruction , 5,6% valve obstruction, 14,3% abscess, 3,7% valve aneurysm, 5,6% pseudoaneurysm and 5,6% fistula. Regurgitation was observed in 62,1%. The intrahospitalar mortality was 29,9%.
Comparing both groups, pts with prosthetic IE had more previous history of HF (40,5% vs 20,5% p = 0,009) and diabetes (31,7% vs 15,3% p = 0,020). No differences were found in what concerns microrganisms involved.
Echocardiographically, pts with prosthetic valve had predominantly AoV involvement (81,1% vs 45,5% p < 0,001), less vegetation (75% vs 91,8% p = 0,01) and less regurgitation (45% vs 67,8% p = 0,01). They had more local complications (61% vs 27,7% p> 0,001) like valve obstruction (12,5% vs 3,3% p = 0,043), abscess (32,5% vs 8,3% p> 0,001) or pseudoaneurysm (17,5% vs 1,7% p= 0,001).
In what concerns morbidity burden, developed more HF during hospitalization (56,1% vs 37,7% p= 0,037) as well as more isquemic and haemorragic stroke(85,7% vs 42,3%. P = 0,004 and 28,6% vs 2,4% p = 0,012, respectively). However there were no differences regarding the development of septic shock (p = 0,542) or overall embolization (p = 0,732). At last, no differences were found in intrahospitalar(IH) mortality (p = 0,085), relapse (p = 0,573) or overall survival between both groups (log rank: 1,5, p = 0,217).
Conclusion
Pts with prosthetic valve IE usually have worse outcomes. However,for this population,we conclude that besides having more HF and stroke, there were no differences in what concerns septic shock or overall embolization, as well as IH mortality and survival between both groups.
Emphysematous pyelonephritis with air bubble in the inferior vena cava
