Effects of Pair Programming in an Introductory Programming Course for College Students : Academic Performance and Student Satisfaction

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 537-545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Choongkyo Jeong ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mewati Ayub ◽  
Oscar Karnalim ◽  
Risal Risal ◽  
Wenny Franciska Senjaya ◽  
Maresha Caroline Wijanto

Due to its high failure rate, Introductory Programming has become a main concern. One of the main issues is the incapability of slow-paced students to cope up with given programming materials. This paper proposes a learning technique which utilizes pair programming to help slow-paced students on Introductory Programming; each slow-paced student is paired with a fast-paced student and the latter is encouraged to teach the former as a part of  grading system. An evaluation regarding that technique has been conducted on three undergraduate classes from an Indonesian university for the second semester of 2018. According to the evaluation, the use of pair programming may help both slow-paced and fast-paced students. Nevertheless, it may not significantly affect individual academic performance. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-229
Author(s):  
Mewati Ayub ◽  
Oscar Karnalim ◽  
Laurentius Risal ◽  
Maresha Caroline Wijanto

A study shows that pair programming can help slow-paced students in completing Introductory Programming assessment. This paper replicates the study on Data Structure course, in which the completion of the assessments does not only rely on logic but also theoretical knowledge. The aim is to check whether pair programming is still helpful on such new assessment characteristics. Three classes of Data Structure course with 14 teaching weeks and a total of 72 undergraduate students are considered in this study. Two of the classes are about Basic Data Structure while another one is the advanced one. Our evaluation shows that pair programming can help slow-paced students in both pair and individual academic performance. It also increases overall academic performance if the tasks are more logic oriented. Nevertheless, no benefits provided for fast-paced students paired to the slow-paced ones, even though all students appreciate the use of pair programming.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Van Buladaco ◽  
Garri Mikhail Aguirre ◽  
Joshua Manito ◽  
Alexis Soliman ◽  
El Christian Villareal

NASPA Journal ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kellah M. Edens

College students are sleeping less during the week than reported a few years ago. Lack of sleep among college students has been identified as one of the top three healthrelated impediments to academic performance by the American College Health Association’s National College Health Assessment survey; and it is associated with lower grades, incompletion of courses, as well as negative moods. This research examines the underlying dynamics of lack of sleep on academic motivation, a key predictor of academic performance. Specifically, the relationship of sleep habits with self-efficacy, performance versus mastery goal orientation, persistence, and tendency to procrastinate were investigated. Findings indicate that 42% of the participants (159 students out of a total of 377) experience excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS); and those identified with EDS tend: (1) to be motivated by performance goals rather than mastery goals; (2) to engage in procrastination (a self-handicapping strategy) to a greater extent than students who are rested; and (3) to have decreased self-efficacy, as compared to students not reporting EDS. Several recommendations for campus health professionals to consider for a Healthy Campus Initiative are made based on the findings.


2002 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlie McDowell ◽  
Linda Werner ◽  
Heather Bullock ◽  
Julian Fernald

2006 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 341-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa A. Harrison ◽  
Chiesha M. Stevens ◽  
Adrienne N. Monty ◽  
Christine A. Coakley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document