scholarly journals Is the Neck Disability Index an Appropriate Measure for Changes in Physical Function After Surgery for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy?

10.14444/7007 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-58
Author(s):  
DHRUV K.C. GOYAL ◽  
HAMADI A. MURPHY ◽  
DOUGLAS A. HOLLERN ◽  
SRIKANTH N. DIVI ◽  
KRISTEN NICHOLSON ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Function ◽  
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Neck Disability

scholarly journals Anterior Controllable Antedisplacement and Fusion (ACAF) technique for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy with spinal stenosis (MCSMSS): a retrospective study of 45 cases

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi Luo ◽  
Kaiqiang Sun ◽  
Jingchuan Sun ◽  
Shunmin Wang ◽  
Yuan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Stenosis ◽  
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Csf Leakage ◽  
One Year ◽  
Neck Disability ◽  
Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Abstract Background To investigate the clinical effect of anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) technique for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy with spinal stenosis (MCSMSS), and compare ACAF with hybrid decompression fixation (HDF). Methods A retrospective analysis of 85 cases with MCSMSS was carried out. 45 patients were treated with ACAF, while 40 patients were treated with HDF. The operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative complications, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, Computed Tomography (CT) transverse measurement, cervical curvature and Kang's grade were compared between two groups. Results The patients were followed up for 12 to 17 months. Compared with HDF, ACAF group achieved better decompression according to CT measurement and Kang’s grade (P < 0.05), and recovered to a greater cervical Cobb’s angle (P < 0.05). However, JOA score and NDI index showed no significant difference one year after surgery (P＞0.05). Additionally, ACAF presented longer operation time and greater intraoperative blood loss (P < 0.05). As to complications, ACAF developed less incidences of cerebrospinal fluid examination (CSF) leakage, neurologic deterioration, epidural hematoma and C5 palsy by comparing with HDF. Conclusions ACAF is an effective method for the treatment of MCSMSS. Compared with HDF, ACAF has the advantages of significant decompression, increasing cervical curvature, and reducing the incidences of complications.

scholarly journals Anterior versus posterior approach to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy, clinical and radiological results with long period of follow-up

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 205031211876619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ziad A Audat ◽  
Mohammad D Fawareh ◽  
Ahmad M Radydeh ◽  
Moutasem M Obeidat ◽  
Mohannad A Odat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Local Score ◽  
Radiological Results ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Neck Disability ◽  
Clinical And Radiological Results

Background: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy increases with age, but not all cases are symptomatic. It is usually diagnosed clinically and radiologically (X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging). Surgical treatment is indicated in severe symptomatic cases, while treatment controversy exists in the presence of less severe cases. Anterior and posterior approaches are generally used for decompression with no significant differences in the results of both. Methods: A total of 287 patients of cervical spondylotic myelopathy were treated at our hospital between January 2004 and December 2015. Only 140 patients were eligible for our study. They had at least 5 years of follow-up using full clinical scores and radiological evaluation. They were divided into two groups: group I with 73 patients (aged 23–79 years) underwent posterior decompression, lateral mass instrumentation, and fusion, while group II with 67 patients (aged 33–70 years) underwent anterior decompression, instrumentation, and fusion. Neck Disability Index, local score, and X-ray were used in the evaluation of the patients. Results: Preoperative mean ± standard deviation of Neck Disability Index of both the groups was 32.06 ± 6.33 and 29.88 ± 5.48, which improved in the last visit (>5 years) to 5.81 ± 7.39 and 2.94 ± 5.48 for groups I and II, respectively (p value <0.05). The local score of groups I and II was (P = 1, F = 21, G = 31, E = 19) and (P = 1, F = 12, G = 36, E = 18), which on discharge day improved to (P = 1, F = 4, G = 12, E = 55) and (P = 0, F = 3, G = 6, E = 58) at last follow-up, respectively. Fusion rate was nearly equal for both the groups during all the follow-up intervals and it was 91.1% and 91.7% in the last follow-up. Conclusion: There were no significant differences in the clinical and radiological results between the anterior and posterior approaches used in the surgical treatment of spondylotic cervical myelopathy. However, statistically significant results of Neck Disability Index of anterior approach were not clinically important and may be due to changes in the size and shape of the neck in group II.

scholarly journals Do measures of physical function enhance the prediction of persistent pain and disability following a whiplash injury? Protocol for a prospective observational study in Spain

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. e035736
Author(s):  
Ahmed Alalawi ◽  
Alejandro Luque-Suarez ◽  
Manuel Fernandez-Sanchez ◽  
Alessio Gallina ◽  
David Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Physical Function ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Whiplash Injury ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Persistent Pain ◽  
Physical Factors ◽  
Post Injury ◽  
Neck Disability

IntroductionNot all factors that predict persistent pain and disability following whiplash injury are known. In particular, few physical factors, such as changes in movement and muscle behaviour, have been investigated. The aim of this study is to identify predictive factors that are associated with the development of persistent pain and disability following a whiplash injury by combining contemporary measures of physical function together with established psychological and pain-related predictive factors.Methods and analysisA prospective observational study will recruit 150 consecutive eligible patients experiencing whiplash-related symptoms, admitted to a private physiotherapy clinic in Spain within 15 days of their whiplash injury. Poor outcome will be measured using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), defined as an NDI score of 30% or greater at 6 months post injury. Candidate predictors, including demographic characteristics, injury characteristics, pain characteristics, self-reported psychosocial factors and physical factors, will be collected at baseline (within 15 days of inception). Regression analyses will be performed to identify factors that are associated with persistent neck pain and disability over the study period.Ethics and disseminationThe project has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the province of Malaga, Spain (#30052019). The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Multi-shot echo-planar diffusion tensor imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy

2020 ◽  
Vol 102-B (9) ◽  
pp. 1210-1218
Author(s):  
Hanwen Zhang ◽  
Li Guan ◽  
Yong Hai ◽  
Yuzeng Liu ◽  
Hongtao Ding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diffusion Tensor Imaging ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽  
Diffusion Tensor ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Cord Compression ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
High Signal ◽  
Japanese Orthopedic Association ◽  
Neck Disability

Aims The aim of this study was to use diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to investigate changes in diffusion metrics in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) up to five years after decompressive surgery. We correlated these changes with clinical outcomes as scored by the Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) method, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Methods We used multi-shot, high-resolution, diffusion tensor imaging (ms-DTI) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to investigate the change in diffusion metrics and clinical outcomes up to five years after anterior cervical interbody discectomy and fusion (ACDF). High signal intensity was identified on T2-weighted imaging, along with DTI metrics such as fractional anisotropy (FA). MJOA, NDI, and VAS scores were also collected and compared at each follow-up point. Spearman correlations identified correspondence between FA and clinical outcome scores. Results Significant differences in mJOA scores and FA values were found between preoperative and postoperative timepoints up to two years after surgery. FA at the level of maximum cord compression (MCL) preoperatively was significantly correlated with the preoperative mJOA score. FA postoperatively was also significantly correlated with the postoperative mJOA score. There was no statistical relationship between NDI and mJOA or VAS. Conclusion ms-DTI can detect microstructural changes in affected cord segments and reflect functional improvement. Both FA values and mJOA scores showed maximum recovery two years after surgery. The DTI metrics are significantly associated with pre- and postoperative mJOA scores. DTI metrics are a more sensitive, timely, and quantifiable surrogate for evaluating patients with CSM and a potential quantifiable biomarker for spinal cord dysfunction. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(9):1210–1218.

scholarly journals Comparison of Two Reconstructive Techniques in the Surgical Management of Four-Level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
FengNing Li ◽  
ZhongHai Li ◽  
Xuan Huang ◽  
Zhi Chen ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Neck Disability ◽  
Cervical Spine Alignment

To compare the clinical efficacy and radiological outcome of treating 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) with either anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or “skip” corpectomy and fusion, 48 patients with 4-level CSM who had undergone ACDF or SCF at our hospital were analyzed retrospectively between January 2008 and June 2011. Twenty-seven patients received ACDF (Group A) and 21 patients received SCF. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, and Cobb’s angles of the fused segments and C2-7 segments were compared in the two groups. The minimum patient follow-up was 2 years. No significant differences between the groups were found in demographic and baseline disease characteristics, duration of surgery, or follow-up time. Our study demonstrates that there was no significant difference in the clinical efficacy of ACDF and SCF, but ACDF involves less intraoperative blood loss, better cervical spine alignment, and fewer postoperative complications than SCF.

scholarly journals Review of laminoplasty versus laminectomy in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Riccardo Paracino ◽  
Maria Rossella Fasinella ◽  
Fabrizio Mancini ◽  
Alessandra Marini ◽  
Mauro Dobran
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Neck Disability Index ◽  
Posterior Longitudinal Ligament ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Cervical Trauma ◽  
Improvement Rate ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Neck Disability

Background: We reviewed the literature comparing the indications/efficacy of laminectomy (LA) with or without fusion versus laminoplasty (LP) in the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods: We identified 14 studies in PubMed/Medline to include in our analysis. Outcomes were assessed utilizing the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index, and Nurick scale. Variables studied included ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), cervical range of motion (ROM), the C2-C7 sagittal Cobb angle, the Ishihara index, and the Hirabayashi scale. Patients with cervical trauma/fracture, infection, or tumor were excluded from the study. Results: In these 14 studies, there were no significant differences between LA and LP groups in terms of preoperative versus postoperative: JOA scores (e.g., including the improvement rate), VAS scores, and ROM. However, the LA patients demonstrated greater postoperative cervical lordosis versus those in the LP group. Conclusion: At present, there are no guidelines for choosing LA versus LP for treating CSM. Factors that should be considered when choosing one procedure over the other should include the patients’ preoperative clinical status, the type of CSM, the pathological extent of OPLL, and whether there is a sufficient cervical lordotic curvature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document