A two-stage method to determine parameters of (R, Q) inventory policy with storage capacity for a single item and multiple items

Author(s):  
Jirachai Buddhakulsomsiri ◽  
Kanokwan Singha ◽  
Parthana Parthanadee
2018 ◽  
Vol 154 ◽  
pp. 9-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vahab Honari ◽  
Jim Underschultz ◽  
Xingjin Wang ◽  
Andrew Garnett ◽  
Xiangzeng Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiuli Ma ◽  
Jeffrey Joseph Starns ◽  
David Kellen

We explored a two-stage recognition memory paradigm in which people first make single-item “studied”/“not studied” decisions and then have a chance to correct their errors in forced-choice trials. Each forced-choice trial included one studied word (“target”) and one non-studied word (“lure”) that received the same previous single-item response. For example, a “studied”-“studied” trial would have a target that was correctly called “studied” and a lure that was incorrectly called “studied.” The two-high-threshold (2HT) model and the unequal-variance signal detection (UVSD) model predict opposite effects of biasing the initial single-item responses on subsequent forced-choice accuracy. Results from two experiments showed that the bias effect is actually near zero and well out of the range of effects predicted by either model. Follow-up analyses showed that the model failures were not a function of experiment artifacts like changing memory states between the two types of recognition trials. Follow-up analyses also showed that the dual process signal detection (DPSD) model made better predictions for the forced-choice data than 2HT and UVSD models.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vahab Honari ◽  
Jim Underschultz ◽  
Andrew Garnett ◽  
Xingjin Wang ◽  
Xiangzeng Wang ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 683-693
Author(s):  
Cheshmeh Chamani ◽  
El-Houssaine Aghezzaf ◽  
Abdelhakim Khatab ◽  
Birger Raa ◽  
Yogang Singh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 867-873
Author(s):  
James M. Gold ◽  
Sonia Bansal ◽  
John M. Gaspar ◽  
Shuo Chen ◽  
Benjamin M. Robinson ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundWorking memory (WM) deficits are seen as a core deficit in schizophrenia, implicated in the broad cognitive impairment seen in the illness. Here we examine the impact of WM storage of a single item on the operation of other cognitive systems.MethodsWe studied 37 healthy controls (HCS) and 43 people with schizophrenia (PSZ). Each trial consisted of a sequence of two potential target stimuli, T1 and T2. T1 was a letter presented for 100 ms. After delays of 100–800 ms, T2 was presented. T2 was a 1 or a 2 and required a speeded response. In one condition, subjects were instructed to ignore T1 but respond to T2. In another condition, they were required to report T1 after making their speeded response to T2 (i.e. to make a speeded T2 response while holding T1 in WM).ResultsPSZ were dramatically slowed at responding to T2 when T1 was held in WM. A repeated measures ANOVA yielded main effects of group, delay, and condition with a group by condition interaction (p's < 0.001). Across delays, the slowing of the T2 response when required to hold T1 in memory, relative to ignoring T1, was nearly 3 times higher in PSZ than HCS (633 v. 219 ms).ConclusionsWhereas previous studies have focused on reduced storage capacity, the present study found that PSZ are impaired at performing tasks while they are successfully maintaining a single item in WM. This may play a role in the broad cognitive impairment seen in PSZ.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document