The significance of Supplier Performance Management in Quality Improvement

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Jigar Doshi
2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 587-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert William Smith ◽  
Elaina Orlando ◽  
Whitney Berta

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine how the design and implementation of learning models for performance management can foster continuous learning and quality improvement within a publicly funded, multi-site community hospital organization. Design/methodology/approach Niagara Health’s patient flow performance management system, a learning model, was studied over a 20-month period. A descriptive case study design guided the analysis of qualitative observational data and its synthesis with organizational learning theory literature. Emerging from this analysis were four propositions to inform the implementation of learning models and future research. Findings This performance management system was observed to enable: ongoing performance-related knowledge exchange by creating opportunities for routine social interaction; collective recognition and understanding of practice and performance patterns; relationship building, learning for improvement, and “higher order” learning through dialogue facilitated using humble inquiry; and, alignment of quality improvement efforts to organizational strategic objectives through a multi-level feedback/feed-forward communication structure. Research limitations/implications The single organization and descriptive study design may limit the generalizability of the findings and introduce confirmation bias. Future research should more comprehensively evaluate the impact of learning models on organizational learning processes and performance outcomes. Practical implications This study offers novel insight which may inform the design and implementation of learning models for performance management within and beyond the study site. Originality/value Few studies have examined the mechanics of performance management systems in relation to organizational learning theory and research. Broader adoption of learning models may be key to the development of continuously learning and improving health systems.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 589-613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Plaček ◽  
David Špaček ◽  
František Ochrana ◽  
Milan Křápek ◽  
Petra Dvořáková

The purpose of this study is to discuss the influence of excellence in the use of performance management and quality improvements tools on performance of Czech municipalities, and especially their cost efficiency. Municipalities' performance is analyzed using data envelopment analysis focused on inputs. A quasi-experimental design is utilized and excelling municipalities are compared with two control groups. The first is represented by municipalities that use excellence models and quality improvement tools but have not been awarded a national excellence prize; the second by municipalities which do not use them. The results do not indicate any significant difference between the three groups of municipalities. This means that the excellence in utilization of performance management and quality improvement tools does not produce performance approaching that of cost efficiency.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 188-188
Author(s):  
Victoria Karuna Hagens ◽  
Eric Gutierrez ◽  
Yidan Xie ◽  
Michelle Ang ◽  
Vicky Simanovski ◽  
...  

188 Background: Radiation treatment services are delivered in 16 facilities spread across the province of Ontario, centralized through Cancer Care Ontario’s oversight of quality of care, equipment, hospital funding, clinical and technical guidelines. Methods: In order to ensure high quality care, Cancer Care Ontario employs a systematic approach performance management, whereby facilities are held accountable to achieving provincial quality targets. For radiation treatment, the quality improvement priorities that have leveraged this approach over the last 10 years have included: reduction of wait times to consultation; reduction of wait times to start of treatment; adoption of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) where appropriate; and implementation of peer review for treatment plans. In each case, key performance indicators were developed for use in provincial scorecards designed to focus the attention of local clinical and administrative leadership. Regular performance discussions with senior leaders took place throughout implementation, and targeted intervention occurred with facilities that were lagging behind their peers. Results: See table. Conclusions: The ability to centrally monitor the implementation of quality improvement initiatives across a large jurisdiction, and to hold the leadership of each facility accountable to provincial targets through regular feedback and escalation, has been a key component of highly successful change management initiatives in radiation treatment in Ontario. [Table: see text]


Author(s):  
Jeffrey B Boord ◽  
Jeannie Byrd ◽  
Thomas DiSalvo ◽  
Brittany L Cunningham

Background: Continuous quality improvement (CQI) in health care systems necessitates an approach to review care delivery processes, systems, group and individual performances, incidents and outcomes. A robust process should 1) be multidisciplinary, 2) occur in “real-time”, 3) provide detailed review and discussion of care processes, performance and outcomes and 4) generate actionable rapid cycle improvement opportunities. Aim: To craft a sustainable management process for CQI for all clinical operational units of the Vanderbilt Heart and Vascular Institute (VHVI). Methods: We convened a standing multidisciplinary biweekly managerial forum (termed ImPact - “Improving Patient Care Together”) of quality medical directors, key clinical physicians and nurses, nursing unit managers, hospital administrators, and quality consultants. ImPact follows a standing structured agenda: 1) all mortalities since last meeting, 2) morbidity including “major misses” and major adverse events, 3) rapid response team calls, 4) out of ICU “codes”, 5) events reported by staff in our hospital's anonymous reporting system, 6) events brought forward by any clinician or unit manager, 7) interval progress on ongoing rapid cycle improvement projects. Results: The topics for rapid cycle improvement that have surfaced to date are listed in the Table . In addition to facilitating and prioritizing rapid cycle quality improvement and patient safety efforts, ImPact provides a link to our regular morbidity and mortality (M&M) conferences in cardiology and cardiac surgery. We have been able to identify common issues that extend beyond individual clinical care areas, allowing better understanding of vulnerabilities in systems of care Conclusions: A multidisciplinary, structured, regularly scheduled meeting of physician and nursing clinical and quality leaders, unit managers and administrators is a critical component of performance management and improvement. Quality Topics Identified Topics Contribution, n Percent Handoff and communication 9 27 Equipment 7 21 Medication administration 5 15 Education to staff (M&M) 4 12 Patient transport 3 9 Blood product administration 2 6 Risk management 2 6 Vascular service integration 1 3


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document