The safety potential of automatic emergency braking and adaptive cruise control and actions to improve the potential

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Roni Utriainen ◽  
Markus Pöllänen
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Emergency Braking

scholarly journals Estimation of the Closest In-Path Vehicle by Low-Channel LiDAR and Camera Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Vehicles

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 3124
Author(s):  
Hyunjin Bae ◽  
Gu Lee ◽  
Jaeseung Yang ◽  
Gwanjun Shin ◽  
Gyeungho Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Performance ◽  
Sensor Fusion ◽  
Autonomous Vehicles ◽  
Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Autonomous Driving ◽  
Fusion Method ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Test Protocol ◽  
Emergency Braking ◽  
Overall Stability

In autonomous driving, using a variety of sensors to recognize preceding vehicles at middle and long distances is helpful for improving driving performance and developing various functions. However, if only LiDAR or cameras are used in the recognition stage, it is difficult to obtain the necessary data due to the limitations of each sensor. In this paper, we proposed a method of converting the vision-tracked data into bird’s eye-view (BEV) coordinates using an equation that projects LiDAR points onto an image and a method of fusion between LiDAR and vision-tracked data. Thus, the proposed method was effective through the results of detecting the closest in-path vehicle (CIPV) in various situations. In addition, even when experimenting with the EuroNCAP autonomous emergency braking (AEB) test protocol using the result of fusion, AEB performance was improved through improved cognitive performance than when using only LiDAR. In the experimental results, the performance of the proposed method was proven through actual vehicle tests in various scenarios. Consequently, it was convincing that the proposed sensor fusion method significantly improved the adaptive cruise control (ACC) function in autonomous maneuvering. We expect that this improvement in perception performance will contribute to improving the overall stability of ACC.

Smart Driving System for Improving Traffic Flow

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
Rajesh Kumar Gupta ◽  
L. N. Padhy ◽  
Sanjay Kumar Padhi
Keyword(s):  
Traffic Flow ◽  
Traffic Congestion ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Human Perception ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Driving System ◽  
V2v Communication ◽  
Traffic Conditions ◽  
Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control

Traffic congestion on road networks is one of the most significant problems that is faced in almost all urban areas. Driving under traffic congestion compels frequent idling, acceleration, and braking, which increase energy consumption and wear and tear on vehicles. By efficiently maneuvering vehicles, traffic flow can be improved. An Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) system in a car automatically detects its leading vehicle and adjusts the headway by using both the throttle and the brake. Conventional ACC systems are not suitable in congested traffic conditions due to their response delay.  For this purpose, development of smart technologies that contribute to improved traffic flow, throughput and safety is needed. In today’s traffic, to achieve the safe inter-vehicle distance, improve safety, avoid congestion and the limited human perception of traffic conditions and human reaction characteristics constrains should be analyzed. In addition, erroneous human driving conditions may generate shockwaves in addition which causes traffic flow instabilities. In this paper to achieve inter-vehicle distance and improved throughput, we consider Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC) system. CACC is then implemented in Smart Driving System. For better Performance, wireless communication is used to exchange Information of individual vehicle. By introducing vehicle to vehicle (V2V) communication and vehicle to roadside infrastructure (V2R) communications, the vehicle gets information not only from its previous and following vehicle but also from the vehicles in front of the previous Vehicle and following vehicle. This enables a vehicle to follow its predecessor at a closer distance under tighter control.

Exploring end-user experiences: self-perceived notions on use of adaptive cruise control systems

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 134 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Strand ◽  
J. Nilsson ◽  
I.C.M. Karlsson ◽  
L. Nilsson
Keyword(s):  
Control Systems ◽  
Adaptive Cruise Control ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
End User ◽  
User Experiences
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document