scholarly journals The Case of “Less is More”: Modelling Risk-Preference with Expected Downside Risk

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihály Ormos ◽  
Dusán Timotity
Keyword(s):  
Value At Risk ◽  
Utility Theory ◽  
Risk Measure ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Downside Risk ◽  
Psychological Explanation ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Expected Return ◽  
Linear Predictor ◽  
Less Is More

AbstractThis paper discusses an alternative explanation for the empirical findings contradicting the positive relationship between risk (variance) and reward (expected return). We show that these contradicting results might be due to the false definition of risk-perception, which we correct by introducing Expected Downside Risk (EDR). The EDR parameter, similar to the Expected Shortfall or Conditional Value-at-Risk, measures the tail risk, however, fits and better explains the utility perception of investors. Our results indicate that when using the EDR as risk measure, both the positive and negative relationship between expected return and risk can be derived under standard conditions (e. g. expected utility theory and positive risk-aversion). Therefore, no alternative psychological explanation or additional boundary condition on utility theory is required to explain the phenomenon. Furthermore, we show empirically that it is a more precise linear predictor of expected return than volatility, both for individual assets and portfolios.

scholarly journals A Bi-Objective Portfolio Optimization with Conditional Value-at-Risk

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 47-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartosz Sawik
Keyword(s):  
Value At Risk ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Risk Measure ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Programming Approach ◽  
Expected Return ◽  
Worst Case ◽  
Warsaw Stock Exchange ◽  
The Relationship

This paper presents a bi-objective portfolio model with the expected return as a performance measure and the expected worst-case return as a risk measure. The problems are formulated as a bi-objective linear program. Numerical examples based on 1000, 3500 and 4020 historical daily input data from the Warsaw Stock Exchange are presented and selected computational results are provided. The computational experiments prove that the proposed linear programming approach provides the decision maker with a simple tool for evaluating the relationship between the expected and the worst-case portfolio return.

scholarly journals Taming Tail Risk: Regularized Multiple β Worst-Case CVaR Portfolio

Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 922
Author(s):  
Kei Nakagawa ◽  
Katsuya Ito
Keyword(s):  
Value At Risk ◽  
Risk Measures ◽  
Risk Measure ◽  
Downside Risk ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Worst Case ◽  
Tail Risk ◽  
Promising Alternative ◽  
Investment Process

The importance of proper tail risk management is a crucial component of the investment process and conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) is often used as a tail risk measure. CVaR is the asymmetric risk measure that controls and manages the downside risk of a portfolio while symmetric risk measures such as variance consider both upside and downside risk. In fact, minimum CVaR portfolio is a promising alternative to traditional mean-variance optimization. However, there are three major challenges in the minimum CVaR portfolio. Firstly, when using CVaR as a risk measure, we need to determine the distribution of asset returns, but it is difficult to actually grasp the distribution; therefore, we need to invest in a situation where the distribution is uncertain. Secondly, the minimum CVaR portfolio is formulated with a single β and may output significantly different portfolios depending on the β. Finally, most portfolio allocation strategies do not account for transaction costs incurred by each rebalancing of the portfolio. In order to improve these challenges, we propose a Regularized Multiple β Worst-case CVaR (RM-WCVaR) portfolio. The characteristics of this portfolio are as follows: it makes CVaR robust with worst-case CVaR which is still an asymmetric risk measure, it is stable among multiple β, and against changes in weights over time. We perform experiments on well-known benchmarks to evaluate the proposed portfolio.RM-WCVaR demonstrates superior performance of having both higher risk-adjusted returns and lower maximum drawdown.

scholarly journals Multi-stage stochastic model in portfolio selection problem

Filomat ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 991-1001
Author(s):  
Shokoofeh Banihashemi ◽  
Ali Azarpour ◽  
Marziye Kaveh
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Portfolio Selection ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Risk Measures ◽  
Risk Measure ◽  
Selection Problem ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Expected Return ◽  
Portfolio Selection Problem ◽  
Multi Stage

This paper is a novel work of portfolio-selection problem solving using multi objective model considering four parameters, Expected return, downside beta coefficient, semivariance and conditional value at risk at a specified confidence level. Multi-period models can be defined as stochastic models. Early studies on portfolio selection developed using variance as a risk measure; although, theories and practices revealed that variance, considering its downsides, is not a desirable risk measure. To increase accuracy and overcoming negative aspects of variance, downside risk measures like semivarinace, downside beta covariance, value at risk and conditional value at risk was other risk measures that replaced in models. These risk measures all have advantages over variance and previous works using these parameters have shown improvements in the best portfolio selection. Purposed models are solved using genetic algorithm and for the topic completion, numerical example and plots to measure the performance of model in four dimensions are provided.

OPTIMAL REINSURANCE FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF BOTH AN INSURER AND A REINSURER UNDER THE CVAR RISK MEASURE AND VAJDA CONDITION

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-29
Author(s):  
Yanhong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Loss Function ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Numerical Study ◽  
Risk Measure ◽  
Convex Combination ◽  
Weighting Factor ◽  
Loss Functions ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Optimal Reinsurance ◽  
The Impact

ABSTRACT In this paper, we study the optimal reinsurance contracts that minimize the convex combination of the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) of the insurer’s loss and the reinsurer’s loss over the class of ceded loss functions such that the retained loss function is increasing and the ceded loss function satisfies Vajda condition. Among a general class of reinsurance premium principles that satisfy the properties of risk loading and convex order preserving, the optimal solutions are obtained. Our results show that the optimal ceded loss functions are in the form of five interconnected segments for general reinsurance premium principles, and they can be further simplified to four interconnected segments if more properties are added to reinsurance premium principles. Finally, we derive optimal parameters for the expected value premium principle and give a numerical study to analyze the impact of the weighting factor on the optimal reinsurance.

scholarly journals Portfolio Optimization Constrained by Performance Attribution

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 201
Author(s):  
Yuan Hu ◽  
W. Brent Lindquist ◽  
Svetlozar T. Rachev
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Optimization ◽  
Asset Allocation ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Risk Measures ◽  
Risk Measure ◽  
Selection Effect ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Positive Role ◽  
Performance Attribution ◽  
Dow Jones Industrial Average

This paper investigates performance attribution measures as a basis for constraining portfolio optimization. We employ optimizations that minimize conditional value-at-risk and investigate two performance attributes, asset allocation (AA) and the selection effect (SE), as constraints on asset weights. The test portfolio consists of stocks from the Dow Jones Industrial Average index. Values for the performance attributes are established relative to two benchmarks, equi-weighted and price-weighted portfolios of the same stocks. Performance of the optimized portfolios is judged using comparisons of cumulative price and the risk-measures: maximum drawdown, Sharpe ratio, Sortino–Satchell ratio and Rachev ratio. The results suggest that achieving SE performance thresholds requires larger turnover values than that required for achieving comparable AA thresholds. The results also suggest a positive role in price and risk-measure performance for the imposition of constraints on AA and SE.

scholarly journals Measuring parametric and semiparametric downside risks of selected agricultural commodities

2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (No. 8) ◽  
pp. 305-315
Author(s):  
Dejan Živkov ◽  
Marijana Joksimović ◽  
Suzana Balaban
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Soybean Oil ◽  
Soybean Meal ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Downside Risk ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Agricultural Commodities ◽  
Second Best ◽  
Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity ◽  
Very High

In this paper, we evaluate the downside risk of six major agricultural commodities – corn, wheat, soybeans, soybean meal, soybean oil and oats. For research purposes, we first use an optimal generalised autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (GARCH) model to create residuals, which we later use for measuring downside risks via parametric and semiparametric approaches. Modified value-at-risk (mVaR) and modified conditional value-at-risk (mCVaR) provide more accurate downside risk results than do ordinary value-at-risk (VaR) and conditional value-at-risk (CVaR). We report that soybean oil has the lowest mVaR and mCVaR because it has two very favourable features – skewness around zero and low kurtosis. The second-best commodity is soybeans. The worst-performing downside risk results are in wheat and oats, primarily because of their very high kurtosis values. On the basis of the results, we propose to investors and various agents involved with these agricultural assets that they reduce the risk of loss by combining these assets with other financial or commodity assets that have low risk.

scholarly journals Risk-Averse Multi-Stage Stochastic Programming to Optimizing Vaccine Allocation and Treatment Logistics for Effective Epidemic Response

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuecheng Yin ◽  
Esra Buyuktahtakin
Keyword(s):  
Value At Risk ◽  
Virus Disease ◽  
Risk Measure ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Risk Averse ◽  
Expected Number ◽  
Multi Stage ◽  
Stochastic Mixed Integer Programming

Existing compartmental-logistics models in epidemics control are limited in terms of optimizing the allocation of vaccines and treatment resources under a risk-averse objective. In this paper, we present a data-driven, mean-risk, multi-stage, stochastic epidemics-vaccination-logistics model that evaluates various disease growth scenarios under the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) risk measure to optimize the distribution of treatment centers, resources, and vaccines, while minimizing the total expected number of infections, deaths, and close contacts of infected people under a limited budget. We integrate a new ring vaccination compartment into a Susceptible-Infected-Treated-Recovered-Funeral-Burial epidemics-logistics model. Our formulation involves uncertainty both in the vaccine supply and the disease transmission rate. Here, we also consider the risk of experiencing scenarios that lead to adverse outcomes in terms of the number of infected and dead people due to the epidemic. Combining the risk-neutral objective with a risk measure allows for a trade-off between the weighted expected impact of the outbreak and the expected risks associated with experiencing extremely disastrous scenarios. We incorporate human mobility into the model and develop a new method to estimate the migration rate between each region when data on migration rates is not available. We apply our multi-stage stochastic mixed-integer programming model to the case of controlling the 2018-2020 Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) using real data. Our results show that increasing the risk-aversion by emphasizing potentially disastrous outbreak scenarios reduces the expected risk related to adverse scenarios at the price of the increased expected number of infections and deaths over all possible scenarios. We also find that isolating and treating infected individuals are the most efficient ways to slow the transmission of the disease, while vaccination is supplementary to primary interventions on reducing the number of infections. Furthermore, our analysis indicates that vaccine acceptance rates affect the optimal vaccine allocation only at the initial stages of the vaccine rollout under a tight vaccine supply.

Risk Measures for Natural Resource Management: Description, Simulation Testing, and R Code With Fisheries Examples

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh Andrew Sethi ◽  
Mike Dalton
Keyword(s):  
Natural Resource ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Risk Measures ◽  
Risk Measure ◽  
Policy Decision ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Management Scenarios ◽  
Resource Systems

Abstract Traditional measures that quantify variation in natural resource systems include both upside and downside deviations as contributing to variability, such as standard deviation or the coefficient of variation. Here we introduce three risk measures from investment theory, which quantify variability in natural resource systems by analyzing either upside or downside outcomes and typical or extreme outcomes separately: semideviation, conditional value-at-risk, and probability of ruin. Risk measures can be custom tailored to frame variability as a performance measure in terms directly meaningful to specific management objectives, such as presenting risk as harvest expected in an extreme bad year, or by characterizing risk as the probability of fishery escapement falling below a prescribed threshold. In this paper, we present formulae, empirical examples from commercial fisheries, and R code to calculate three risk measures. In addition, we evaluated risk measure performance with simulated data, and we found that risk measures can provide unbiased estimates at small sample sizes. By decomposing complex variability into quantitative metrics, we envision risk measures to be useful across a range of wildlife management scenarios, including policy decision analyses, comparative analyses across systems, and tracking the state of natural resource systems through time.

scholarly journals CVaR Regression Based on the Relation between CVaR and Mixed-Quantile Quadrangles

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Golodnikov ◽  
Kuzmenko ◽  
Uryasev
Keyword(s):  
Linear Regression ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Risk Measure ◽  
Error Function ◽  
Decomposition Theorem ◽  
Discrete Distributions ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Suggested Approach ◽  
Risk Functions

A popular risk measure, conditional value-at-risk (CVaR), is called expected shortfall (ES) in financial applications. The research presented involved developing algorithms for the implementation of linear regression for estimating CVaR as a function of some factors. Such regression is called CVaR (superquantile) regression. The main statement of this paper is: CVaR linear regression can be reduced to minimizing the Rockafellar error function with linear programming. The theoretical basis for the analysis is established with the quadrangle theory of risk functions. We derived relationships between elements of CVaR quadrangle and mixed-quantile quadrangle for discrete distributions with equally probable atoms. The deviation in the CVaR quadrangle is an integral. We present two equivalent variants of discretization of this integral, which resulted in two sets of parameters for the mixed-quantile quadrangle. For the first set of parameters, the minimization of error from the CVaR quadrangle is equivalent to the minimization of the Rockafellar error from the mixed-quantile quadrangle. Alternatively, a two-stage procedure based on the decomposition theorem can be used for CVaR linear regression with both sets of parameters. This procedure is valid because the deviation in the mixed-quantile quadrangle (called mixed CVaR deviation) coincides with the deviation in the CVaR quadrangle for both sets of parameters. We illustrated theoretical results with a case study demonstrating the numerical efficiency of the suggested approach. The case study codes, data, and results are posted on the website. The case study was done with the Portfolio Safeguard (PSG) optimization package, which has precoded risk, deviation, and error functions for the considered quadrangles.

scholarly journals ESTIMASI NILAI CONDITIONAL VALUE AT RISK MENGGUNAKAN FUNGSI GAUSSIAN COPULA

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 188
Author(s):  
HERLINA HIDAYATI ◽  
KOMANG DHARMAWAN ◽  
I WAYAN SUMARJAYA
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Confidence Level ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Risk Measure ◽  
Copula Function ◽  
Gaussian Copula ◽  
Nonlinear Dependence ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Dependence Structure ◽  
Measurement Tools

Copula is already widely used in financial assets, especially in risk management. It is due to the ability of copula, to capture the nonlinear dependence structure on multivariate assets. In addition, using copula function doesn’t require the assumption of normal distribution. There fore it is suitable to be applied to financial data. To manage a risk the necessary measurement tools can help mitigate the risks. One measure that can be used to measure risk is Value at Risk (VaR). Although VaR is very popular, it has several weaknesses. To overcome the weakness in VaR, an alternative risk measure called CVaR can be used. The porpose of this study is to estimate CVaR using Gaussian copula. The data we used are the closing price of Facebook and Twitter stocks. The results from the calculation using 90%  confidence level showed that the risk that may be experienced is at 4,7%, for 95% confidence level it is at 6,1%, and for 99% confidence level it is at 10,6%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document