scholarly journals Quantification of noncircular stent expansion after TAVR into a pathological annulus and its impact on paravalvular leakage

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 597-600
Author(s):  
Finja Borowski ◽  
Sebastian Kaule ◽  
Jan Oldenburg ◽  
Alper Öner ◽  
Klaus-Peter Schmitz ◽  
...  

Abstract Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) may suffer severe clinical complications, caused by paravalvular leakage (PVL) which is defined as leakage between TAVR and aortic annulus. PVL is often facilitated by a severely calcified annulus. This limits the expansion of a self-expandable TAVR stent. To assess TAVR performance in terms of leakage, measurement of regurgitation fraction in a pathophysiological annulus is recommended according to ISO 5840. For this purpose, a configuration of a circular annulus with a calcification nodule has been proposed in the recently published ISO 5840. The impact of the proposed pathophysiological annulus model on the expansion of self-expandable TAVR stents and on the regurgitation fraction was investigated in this study. For this purpose, two commercially available selfexpandable TAVRs (Evolut R and Portico) were implanted in a calcified annulus model. Circular expansion of the TAVR stents was investigated based on μCT scans of the implanted TAVR. The calcification-induced area in which retrograde flow can occur during diastole was detected. These results were then compared with the experimentally determined regurgitation fraction obtained from pulse duplicator tests. The results of the μCT scans showed a continuous leakage area in the region of the annulus for the Evolut R compared to a locally larger leakage area of the Portico, which, however, reattaches to the annulus in the distal inflow region. The hydrodynamic measurements confirmed a smaller leakage in the pathological annulus for the Portico. In summary, it can be assumed that a continuous leakage area in the TAVR stent inflow region encourages the PVL of TAVR.

Author(s):  
Philipp Breitbart ◽  
Jan Minners ◽  
Manuel Hein ◽  
Holger Schröfel ◽  
Franz-Josef Neumann ◽  
...  

AbstractPrior studies in patients with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) demonstrated an influence of transcatheter heart valve (THV) position on the occurrence of new conductions disturbances (CD) and paravalvular leakage (PVL) post TAVI in balloon-expandable valves (BEV). Purpose of this study was to investigate the THV implantation depth and its influence on the occurrence of CD and PVL in self-expanding valves (SEV). We performed fusion imaging of pre- and post-procedural computed tomography angiography in 104 TAVI-patients (all with Evolut R) to receive a 3-D reconstruction of the THV within the native annulus region. The THV length below the native annulus was measured for assessment of implantation depth. Electrocardiograms pre-discharge were assessed for conduction disturbances (CD), PVL was determined in transthoracic echocardiography. The mean implantation depth of the THV in the whole cohort was 4.3 ± 3.0 mm. Using the best cut-off of ≥ 4 mm in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 60.0%) patients with lower THV position developed more new CD after TAVI (68.2 vs. 23.7%, P < 0.001). A deep THV position was identified as the only predictor for new CD after TAVI (odds ratio [CI] 1.312[1.119–1.539], P = 0.001). The implantation depth showed no influence on the grade of PVL (r = 0.052, P = 0.598). In patients with TAVI using the Evolut R SEV, a lower THV positioning (≥ 4 mm length below annulus) was a predictor for new conduction disturbances. In contrast, implantation depth was not associated with the extent of PVL. Graphic abstract Prostheses positions of self-expanding valves and their influence on the occurrence of new conduction disturbances and the grade of paravalvular leakage after TAVI.


2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 1129
Author(s):  
Giorgio Medranda ◽  
Cheng Zhang ◽  
Brian Case ◽  
Charan Yerasi ◽  
Brian Forrestal ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Matsushita ◽  
B Marchandot ◽  
M Kibler ◽  
C Sato ◽  
J Heger ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Paravalvular leakage (PVL) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is associated with greater mortality. In clinical practice, determining PVL severity after TAVR remains challenging and often requires multiparametric assessment. Purpose This study sought to evaluate the respective value of various modalities of PVL assessments, including transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), cine-angiography, aortic regurgitation index (ARI), and closure time with adenosine diphosphate (CT-ADP), in the prediction of adverse clinical outcomes. Methods We included 1044 patients from our prospective TAVR registry between February 2010 and May 2019. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) was defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure hospitalization within 1-year. Established cutoff values of ARI (&lt;25) and CT-ADP (&gt;180 sec) were used to assess the presence of PVL after TAVR. Results Moderate to severe PVL occurred in 14.2% and 5.2% of patients as measured by TTE and angiography. The rate of patients with ARI &lt;25 and CT-ADP &gt;180 sec were 36.5% and 24.9%, respectively. Among the four modalities, PVL evaluated by angiography predicted poorer clinical outcomes (Log rank test; p=0.001), whereas TTE, ARI &lt;25, and CT-ADP &gt;180 sec were not associated with 1-year MACCE. By multivariate Cox regression analysis, moderate to severe PVL by angiography was an independent predictor of 1-year MACCE (hazard ratio: 1.96; 95% confidence interval: 1.22–3.00; p=0.007). Conclusions Paravalvular leakage measured by angiography was evidenced as the most meaningful modality in the prediction of adverse clinical outcomes. Future multicenter studies are warranted to ensure these findings in the current TAVR era. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 1209-1215
Author(s):  
Giorgio A. Medranda ◽  
Anees Musallam ◽  
Cheng Zhang ◽  
Hank Rappaport ◽  
Paige E. Gallino ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Ueshima ◽  
L.N.F Nai Fovino ◽  
S.J.B Brener ◽  
A.P Pavei ◽  
C.F Fraccaro ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Subjects with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) have been excluded from transcatheter aortic valve re- placement (TAVR) randomized trials. Methods With this meta-analysis of observational studies we first compared TAVR outcomes of BAV vs. tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) patients, stratifying the results by device generation. Then, we looked for differences between balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) bioprostheses in BAV patients. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-day stroke, moderate-severe paravalvular leakage, new pacemaker im- plantation, vascular complications and 1-year mortality. Results Thirteen studies (11,032 patients, 7291 TAV and 3741 BAV) and seven studies (706 patients, 367 treated with BE, 339 with SE valve) met inclusion criteria. Thirty-day (OR=1.13; 95% CI: 0.88–1.46, p=0.33) and 1-year mortality (OR=1.02; 95% CI: 0.77–1.37, p=0.87) were similar between patients receiving TAVR for BAV or TAV. Subjects treated for BAV were at higher risk of conversion to conventional surgery (OR=2.35; 95% CI: 1.30–4.23, p=0.005), implantation of a second valve (OR=2.06; 95% CI: 1.31–3.25; p=0.002), moderate/severe paravalvular leakage (PVL) (OR=1.67; 95% CI: 1.29–2.17; p=0.0001) and device failure (OR=1.26; 95% CI: 1.02–1.56; p=0.04). Rates of adverse events decreased significantly with the use of new-generation devices, but outcome differences remained consistent. BAV patients treated with BE vs. SE valves had similar 30-day and 1-year mortality, stroke and moderate-severe PVL. Balloon-expandable valves were associated with lower rates of a second valve and new pacemaker implantation but carried higher risk of annular rupture. Conclusions BAV patients treated with TAVR had similar 30-day and 1-year mortality as well as stroke and new pacemaker implantation rates compared to TAV subjects, but carried higher risk of moderate/severe PVL, conver- sion to surgery and device failure. Event rates significantly decreased with the use of new-generation devices, but TAVR still showed better procedural results in TAV compared to BAV. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Open Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e001443
Author(s):  
Richard Paul Steeds ◽  
David Messika-Zeitoun ◽  
Jeetendra Thambyrajah ◽  
Antonio Serra ◽  
Eberhard Schulz ◽  
...  

AimsThere is an increasing awareness of gender-related differences in patients with severe aortic stenosis and their outcomes after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).MethodsData from the IMPULSE registry were analysed. Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) were enrolled between March 2015 and April 2017 and stratified by gender. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess the impact of age.ResultsOverall, 2171 patients were enrolled, and 48.0% were female. Women were characterised by a higher rate of renal impairment (31.7 vs 23.3%; p<0.001), were at higher surgical risk (EuroSCORE II: 4.5 vs 3.6%; p=0.001) and more often in a critical preoperative state (7.0vs 4.2%; p=0.003). Men had an increased rate of previous cardiac surgery (9.4 vs 4.7%; p<0.001) and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (4.9 vs 1.3%; p<0.001). Concomitant mitral and tricuspid valve disease was substantially more common among women. Symptoms were highly prevalent in both women and men (83.6 vs 77.3%; p<0.001). AVR was planned in 1379 cases. Women were more frequently scheduled to undergo TAVI (49.3 vs 41.0%; p<0.001) and less frequently for SAVR (20.3 vs 27.5%; p<0.001).ConclusionsThe present data show that female patients with severe AS have a distinct patient profile and are managed in a different way to males. Gender-based differences in the management of patients with severe AS need to be taken into account more systematically to improve outcomes, especially for women.


1998 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 1096-1109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Valdes ◽  
Saeed A Jortani ◽  
Mihai Gheorghiade

Abstract In this Standard of Laboratory Practice we recommend guidelines for therapeutic monitoring of cardiac drugs. Cardiac drugs are primarily used for treatment of angina, arrhythmias, and congestive heart failure. Digoxin, used in congestive heart failure, is widely prescribed and therapeutically monitored. Monitoring and use of antiarrhythmics such as disopyramide and lidocaine have been steadily declining. Immunoassay techniques are currently the most popular methods for measuring cardiac drugs. Several reasons make measurement of cardiac drugs in serum important: their narrow therapeutic index, similarity in clinical complications and presentation of under- and overmedicated patients, need for dosage adjustments, and confirmation of patient compliance. Monitoring may also be necessary in other circumstances, such as assessment of acetylator phenotypes. We present recommendations for measuring digoxin, quinidine, procainamide (and N-acetylprocainamide), lidocaine, and flecainide. We discuss guidelines for measuring unbound digoxin in the presence of an antidote (Fab fragments), for characterizing the impact of digoxin-like immunoreactive factor (DLIF) and other cross-reactants on immunoassays, and for monitoring the unbound (free fraction) of drugs that bind to α1-acid glycoprotein. We also discuss logistic, clinical, hospital, and laboratory practice guidelines needed for implementation of a successful therapeutic drug monitoring service for cardiac drugs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document