Effects of regular and joke dog whistles on perceptions of political candidates

Abstract Our experiment showed a scenario where a White politician used a racist dog whistle (DW) when referring to his Black opponent. We used pilot data to determine DW statements and then tested whether different DWs (joke or regular) would affect perceptions of candidates based on participants’ levels of subtle and explicit racism compared to a comment without racial undertones. Our results indicated that while neither DW affected perceptions of the Black candidate based on participants’ levels of subtle racism, when a regular DW was used, subtle racism was positively associated with more positive perceptions of the White candidate. Our findings can broadly be explained within the context of modern racism and the suppression justification model of prejudice. The presence of a DW served as a prime, allowing those who have subtle anti-Black prejudice to express it through more positive personal perceptions of the White candidate. Without opportunities to justify the expression of their subtle prejudice (i.e. have a non-prejudice reason to dislike the candidate), the participants’ did not report more negative perceptions of the Black candidate. However, there was a “backlash” and participants were less likely to consider voting for the White candidate, particularly when he used a joke DW.

Download Full-text

Personal Perceptions and Perceived Public Opinion About Stuttering in the United States: Implications for Anti-Stigma Campaigns

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology ◽

10.1044/2017_ajslp-16-0191 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 26 (3) ◽

pp. 921-938 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Michael P. Boyle

Keyword(s):

United States ◽

Public Opinion ◽

Exploratory Study ◽

Qualitative Data ◽

The United States ◽

Public Perceptions ◽

Content Areas ◽

The Public ◽

Personal Perceptions ◽

Negative Perceptions

Purpose This exploratory study was the first to obtain quantitative and qualitative data on both personal perceptions and perceived public opinion about stuttering in order to identify topics to include in anti-stigma programs for stuttering. Method Three-hundred ten adults in the United States completed a web survey that assessed knowledge about stuttering and attitudes toward people who stutter (PWS) with questions addressing personal perceptions (direct questions) and perceived public opinion (indirect questions). Results Many participants reported favorable personal perceptions of PWS regarding their intelligence, competence, and potential for success. However, most participants did not personally believe PWS were confident, and most believed they were shy. Perceived public opinion was more unfavorable as a majority agreed that the public is uncomfortable talking with PWS and that the public would recommend PWS avoid jobs requiring high speech demands and avoid talking to large audiences. A minority of participants agreed PWS are perceived publicly as capable or mentally healthy. Conclusions The survey demonstrated misunderstandings and negative perceptions of PWS, especially when measured with perceived public opinion. Results can increase our understanding of content areas that should be included in anti-stigma programs for stuttering and highlight different methods for analyzing public perceptions of stuttering.

Download Full-text

The Development and Validation of a Subtle Racism Scale in South Africa

South African Journal of Psychology ◽

10.1177/008124639102100406 ◽

1991 ◽

Vol 21 (4) ◽

pp. 233-239 ◽

Cited By ~ 35

Author(s):

John Duckitt

Keyword(s):

South Africa ◽

University Students ◽

South African ◽

Racial Prejudice ◽

African Population ◽

South African Population ◽

Modern Racism ◽

Subtle Racism ◽

Validity Criteria ◽

Development And Validation

Research on the concept of symbolic or modern racism has shown that transparent and obvious measures of traditional racism no longer adequately reflect racial prejudice in many American sub-populations. There are indications that this may also be the case for certain segments of the white South African population, particularly in the case of university students who have been the typical subjects of research on prejudice. Traditional measures of prejudice may also be viewed as offensive by subjects and elicit antagonistic reactions. The present study therefore set out to develop and validate a new, more indirect, and subtle measure of anti-black racial prejudice designed to overcome these problems. The results ( N = 217) indicated that the Subtle Racism scale was unidimensional, highly reliable, and showed powerful associations with a number of validity criteria. It clearly outperformed a more traditional measure of racism in all respects.

Download Full-text

Case Studies in Dementia-Related Anxiety

GeroPsych ◽

10.1024/1662-9647/a000243 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 1-6

Author(s):

Molly Maxfield ◽

Jennifer R. Roberts ◽

JoAnna Dieker

Keyword(s):

Alzheimer’S Disease ◽

Alzheimer's Disease ◽

Social Withdrawal ◽

Cognitive Status ◽

Generalized Anxiety ◽

Neurocognitive Disorder ◽

High Genetic Risk ◽

Disease Case ◽

Negative Perceptions

Abstract. Two clients seeking neuropsychological assessment reported anxiety about their cognitive status. We review the cases to increase our understanding of factors contributing to dementia-related anxiety. Case 1 met the criteria for mild neurocognitive disorder; the client’s memory was impaired, and she had a high genetic risk for Alzheimer’s disease. The client reported anxiety about negative perceptions of quality of life among individuals diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease. Case 2 did not meet the criteria for a neurocognitive disorder. Anxiety about this client’s cognitive status appeared attributable to generalized anxiety disorder, given his anxiety about diverse topics. Both clients reported embarrassment about forgetfulness and social withdrawal. Dementia-related anxiety is believed to be relatively common, to exist on a continuum, to have unique social implications, and to stem from various sources, necessitating differing interventions.

Download Full-text

The Negative Consequences of Stuttering for Perceptions of Leadership Ability

Journal of Individual Differences ◽

10.1027/1614-0001/a000336 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 1-8

Author(s):

Virgil Zeigler-Hill ◽

Avi Besser ◽

Yuval Besser

Keyword(s):

Self Esteem ◽

Negative Association ◽

Negative Consequences ◽

Community Members ◽

Perceived Leadership ◽

Negative Perceptions ◽

Low Levels ◽

Perceptions Of Leadership

Abstract. The purpose of the present study was to extend previous research concerning the negative perceptions of stuttering by considering the perceived leadership ability of targets who stuttered compared with targets who did not stutter. We were also interested in the possibility that negative perceptions of the targets (i.e., low levels of self-esteem, intelligence, dominance-based status motivation, and prestige-based status motivation) would mediate the association between stuttering and a lack of perceived leadership ability as well as the possibility that manipulating the ostensible self-esteem level of the target would further moderate these associations. The results for 838 Israeli community members revealed a negative association between stuttering and perceived leadership ability that was mediated by the perceived self-esteem level and dominance-based status motivation of the target. Further, the associations between stuttering and perceptions of leadership ability were moderated by the ostensible self-esteem level of the target. Discussion focuses on the implications of these results for understanding the negative halo that surrounds stuttering.

Download Full-text