scholarly journals FMRFamide-Like Neuropeptides and Mechanosensory Touch Receptor Neurons Regulate Male Sexual Turning Behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans

2007 ◽  
Vol 27 (27) ◽  
pp. 7174-7182 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Liu ◽  
K. Kim ◽  
C. Li ◽  
M. M. Barr
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 467-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoyin Chen ◽  
Margarete Diaz Cuadros ◽  
Martin Chalfie

Abstract Caenorhabditis elegans senses gentle touch along the body via six touch receptor neurons. Although genetic screens and microarray analyses have identified several genes needed for touch sensitivity, these methods miss pleiotropic genes that are essential for the viability, movement, or fertility of the animals. We used neuronally enhanced feeding RNA interference to screen genes that cause lethality or paralysis when mutated, and we identified 61 such genes affecting touch sensitivity, including five positive controls. We confirmed 18 genes by using available alleles, and further studied one of them, tag-170, now renamed txdc-9. txdc-9 preferentially affects anterior touch response but is needed for tubulin acetylation and microtubule formation in both the anterior and posterior touch receptor neurons. Our results indicate that neuronally enhanced feeding RNA interference screens complement traditional mutageneses by identifying additional nonviable genes needed for specific neuronal functions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (37) ◽  
pp. 11690-11695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yushu Chen ◽  
Shashank Bharill ◽  
Ehud Y. Isacoff ◽  
Martin Chalfie

Caenorhabditis elegans senses gentle touch in the six touch receptor neurons (TRNs) using a mechanotransduction complex that contains the pore-forming degenerin/epithelial sodium channel (DEG/ENaC) proteins MEC-4 and MEC-10. Past work has suggested these proteins interact with the paraoxonase-like MEC-6 and the cholesterol-binding stomatin-like MEC-2 proteins. Using single molecule optical imaging in Xenopus oocytes, we found that MEC-4 forms homotrimers and MEC-4 and MEC-10 form 4:4:10 heterotrimers. MEC-6 and MEC-2 do not associate tightly with these trimers and do not influence trimer stoichiometry, indicating that they are not part of the core channel transduction complex. Consistent with the in vitro data, MEC-10, but not MEC-6, formed puncta in TRN neurites that colocalize with MEC-4 when MEC-4 is overexpressed in the TRNs.


2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (35) ◽  
pp. 12695-12704 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Arnadottir ◽  
R. O'Hagan ◽  
Y. Chen ◽  
M. B. Goodman ◽  
M. Chalfie

Development ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 145 (22) ◽  
pp. dev168096 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaogu Zheng ◽  
Felix Qiaochu Jin ◽  
Brian Loeber Trippe ◽  
Ji Wu ◽  
Martin Chalfie

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick D. McClanahan ◽  
Joyce H. Xu ◽  
Christopher Fang-Yen

AbstractThe roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans is an important model system for understanding the genetics and physiology of touch. Classical assays for C. elegans touch, which involve manually touching the animal with a probe and observing its response, are limited by their low throughput and qualitative nature. We developed a microfluidic device in which several dozen animals are subject to spatially localized mechanical stimuli with variable amplitude. The device contains 64 sinusoidal channels through which worms crawl, and hydraulic valves that deliver touch stimuli to the worms. We used this assay to characterize the behavioral responses to gentle touch stimuli and the less well studied harsh (nociceptive) touch stimuli. First, we measured the relative response thresholds of gentle and harsh touch. Next, we quantified differences in the receptive fields between wild type worms and a mutant with non-functioning posterior touch receptor neurons. We showed that under gentle touch the receptive field of the anterior touch receptor neurons extends into the posterior half of the body. Finally, we found that the behavioral response to gentle touch does not depend on the locomotion of the animal immediately prior to the stimulus, but does depend on the location of the previous touch. Responses to harsh touch, on the other hand, did not depend on either previous velocity or stimulus location. Differences in gentle and harsh touch response characteristics may reflect the different innervation of the respective mechanosensory cells. Our assay will facilitate studies of mechanosensation, sensory adaptation, and nociception.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document