A retrospective analysis of electronic endocrinology advice and guidance via NHS e-referral service at University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sajjad Nadeem ◽  
Waseem Aslam ◽  
Helen Cave ◽  
Ragini C Bhake ◽  
Miles Levy ◽  
...  
QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeinab Abdlelhafeez ◽  
Dina Ragab ◽  
Nervana Hussien ◽  
Fatma El – Tabakh

Abstract Background Cancers of unknown primary site (CUPs) are heterogeneous group of metastatic tumors for which a standardized diagnostic work-up could not recognize the site of origin at the time of diagnosis. Cancer registries around the world report the incidence of CUP in the range of 3%–5% of all malignancies, worldwide the overall age-standardized incidence per 100.000 people per year is 4–19 cases. CUP therefore ranks among the top 10 commonest malignancies. CUP occurs equally in both males and females, at average age 60 years old. Incidence of CUP in Egypt is 6.1%in males and 5.5% in females. Aim of the Work to retrospectively identify the prognostic factors that influence treatment outcome and survival of patients diagnosed with cancer of unknown primary treated patients at Clinical Oncology departments at Ain Shams University Hospitals (ASUH) and Helwan University Hospitals by retrospective analysis. Patients and Methods At the department of clinical oncology, Ain Shams University, 102 patients with cancer of unknown primary were identified in the period between January 2012 and December 2017, all patients data was collected and reviewed. The primary end point of this study is to identify different prognostic factors that influence treatment response and OS in 102 patients with CUP in the period from January 2012 to December 2017. Results Patients with PS 1, with no comorbidities showed better treatment response, also Patients younger than 65year, presented with PS1, with no comorbidity had longer survival. Conclusion CUP has a poor prognosis. Some prognostic factors that affect response to treatment and survival in these patients, which may be identified.


Infection ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Heyd ◽  
Anna Maria Eis-Hübinger ◽  
Annemarie Berger ◽  
Sibylle Bierbaum ◽  
Sandra Pietzonka ◽  
...  

Heart ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (Suppl 5) ◽  
pp. A90-A91
Author(s):  
Cheryl Oxley ◽  
Louise Edge ◽  
Rachel Chubsey ◽  
Charlotte Critchlow ◽  
Dargoi Satchi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. v619
Author(s):  
C. Lopez Escola ◽  
O. Sheikh ◽  
H. Franks ◽  
K. Mengoli ◽  
S. Karim ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Julie L. Wambaugh ◽  
Lydia Kallhoff ◽  
Christina Nessler

Purpose This study was designed to examine the association of dosage and effects of Sound Production Treatment (SPT) for acquired apraxia of speech. Method Treatment logs and probe data from 20 speakers with apraxia of speech and aphasia were submitted to a retrospective analysis. The number of treatment sessions and teaching episodes was examined relative to (a) change in articulation accuracy above baseline performance, (b) mastery of production, and (c) maintenance. The impact of practice schedule (SPT-Blocked vs. SPT-Random) was also examined. Results The average number of treatment sessions conducted prior to change was 5.4 for SPT-Blocked and 3.9 for SPT-Random. The mean number of teaching episodes preceding change was 334 for SPT-Blocked and 179 for SPT-Random. Mastery occurred within an average of 13.7 sessions (1,252 teaching episodes) and 12.4 sessions (1,082 teaching episodes) for SPT-Blocked and SPT-Random, respectively. Comparisons of dosage metric values across practice schedules did not reveal substantial differences. Significant negative correlations were found between follow-up probe performance and the dosage metrics. Conclusions Only a few treatment sessions were needed to achieve initial positive changes in articulation, with mastery occurring within 12–14 sessions for the majority of participants. Earlier occurrence of change or mastery was associated with better follow-up performance. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12592190


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document