Retrospective Analysis of the Prognostic Factors That Influence Treatment Response and Survival of Patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeinab Abdlelhafeez ◽  
Dina Ragab ◽  
Nervana Hussien ◽  
Fatma El – Tabakh

Abstract Background Cancers of unknown primary site (CUPs) are heterogeneous group of metastatic tumors for which a standardized diagnostic work-up could not recognize the site of origin at the time of diagnosis. Cancer registries around the world report the incidence of CUP in the range of 3%–5% of all malignancies, worldwide the overall age-standardized incidence per 100.000 people per year is 4–19 cases. CUP therefore ranks among the top 10 commonest malignancies. CUP occurs equally in both males and females, at average age 60 years old. Incidence of CUP in Egypt is 6.1%in males and 5.5% in females. Aim of the Work to retrospectively identify the prognostic factors that influence treatment outcome and survival of patients diagnosed with cancer of unknown primary treated patients at Clinical Oncology departments at Ain Shams University Hospitals (ASUH) and Helwan University Hospitals by retrospective analysis. Patients and Methods At the department of clinical oncology, Ain Shams University, 102 patients with cancer of unknown primary were identified in the period between January 2012 and December 2017, all patients data was collected and reviewed. The primary end point of this study is to identify different prognostic factors that influence treatment response and OS in 102 patients with CUP in the period from January 2012 to December 2017. Results Patients with PS 1, with no comorbidities showed better treatment response, also Patients younger than 65year, presented with PS1, with no comorbidity had longer survival. Conclusion CUP has a poor prognosis. Some prognostic factors that affect response to treatment and survival in these patients, which may be identified.

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S673
Author(s):  
D. Petrakis ◽  
E. Voulgaris ◽  
G. Pentheroudakis ◽  
N. Pavlidis

Author(s):  
Lars Axelsson ◽  
Erik Holmberg ◽  
Jan Nyman ◽  
Anders Högmo ◽  
Helena Sjödin ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HNCUP) is a rare condition whose prognostic factors that are significant for survival vary between studies. No randomized treatment study has been performed thus far, and the optimal treatment is not established. Objective The present study aimed to explore various prognostic factors and compare the two main treatments for HNCUP: neck dissection and (chemo) radiation vs primary (chemo) radiation. Methods A national multicenter study was performed with data from the Swedish Head and Neck Cancer Register (SweHNCR) and from the patients' medical records from 2008 to 2012. Results Two-hundred and sixty HNCUP patients were included. The tumors were HPV-positive in 80%. The overall 5-year survival rate of patients treated with curative intent was 71%. Age (p < 0.001), performance status (p= 0.036), and N stage (p= 0.046) were significant factors for overall survival according to the multivariable analysis. Treatment with neck dissection and (chemo) radiation (122 patients) gave an overall 5-year survival of 73%, and treatment with primary (chemo) radiation (87 patients) gave an overall 5-year survival of 71%, with no significant difference in overall or disease-free survival between the 2 groups. Conclusions Age, performance status, and N stage were significant prognostic factors. Treatment with neck dissection and (chemo) radiation and primary (chemo) radiation gave similar survival outcomes. A randomized treatment study that includes quality of life is needed to establish the optimal treatment.


2013 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. ix38
Author(s):  
F. Fujisawa ◽  
S. Meshihtsuka ◽  
S. Mitsuhashi ◽  
M. Hori ◽  
T. Kaburagi ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 1325-1333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Philipp Reinert ◽  
Julia Sekler ◽  
Christian la Fougère ◽  
Christina Pfannenberg ◽  
Sergios Gatidis

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13514-13514
Author(s):  
M. Ando ◽  
K. Yonemori ◽  
M. Yunokawa ◽  
E. Nakano ◽  
T. Kouno ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document