Review of a 13-Year Single-Center Experience with Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass as the Primary Surgical Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 61 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Holzhey ◽  
Jan P. Cornely ◽  
Ardawan J. Rastan ◽  
Piroze Davierwala ◽  
Friedrich W. Mohr
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome

<p><b>Background and Aim of the Study:</b> In this study, we review our experience with 1768 minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) operations. The focus is on long-term outcome with more than 10 years of follow-up.</p><p><b>Methods:</b> All patients undergoing standard MIDCAB between 1996 and 2009 were included. For all 1768 patients, pre-, intra-, and postoperative data could be completed. Long-term follow-up information about health status, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and freedom from angina was collected annually via questionnaire or personal contact. Five-year follow-up is available for 1313 patients, and 10-year-follow-up is available for 748 patients. A multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for long-term outcome.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Mean age was 63.4 � 10.8 years, mean ejection fraction was 60.0% � 14.2%, and perioperative mortality risk calculated by logistic EuroSCORE was 3.8 � 6.2%. In 31 patients (1.75%) intraoperative conversion to sternotomy was necessary. Early postoperative mortality was 0.8% (15 patients); 0.4% (7 patients) had a perioperative stroke. Seven hundred twelve patients received routine postoperative angiogram, showing 95.5% early graft patency. Short-term target vessel reintervention was needed in 59 patients (3.3%) (11 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA)/stent, 48 re-operation). Kaplan-Meyer analysis revealed a 5-year survival rate of 88.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.6% to 89.9%) and a 10-year-survival rate of 76.6% (95% CI, 73.5% to 78.7%). The freedom from MACCE and angina after 5 and 10 years was 85.3% (95% CI, 83.5% to 87.1%) and 70.9% (95% CI, 68.1% to 73.7%), respectively.</p><p><b>Conclusions:</b> MIDCAB is a safe operation with low postoperative mortality and morbidity. With excellent short-term and long-term results, it is a very good alternative compared to both percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and conventional surgery.</p>

Very long-term outcome of Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Mastroiacovo ◽  
Sabrina Manganiello ◽  
Sergio Pirola ◽  
Calogero Tedesco ◽  
Laura Cavallotti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome

scholarly journals Comparative short-term and long-term outcomes between internal and external intestinal plication in the management of small bowel obstruction

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Song Liu ◽  
Qiongyuan Hu ◽  
Lihua Shao ◽  
Xiaofeng Lu ◽  
Xiaofei Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Small Bowel ◽  
Small Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Bowel Obstruction ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Gut Dysfunction ◽  
Gut Function

Abstract Background Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is common and usually requires surgical intervention. Intestinal plication is a traditional but critical strategy for SBO in certain scenarios. This study is to compare the short-term and long-term outcome between internal and external plications in the management of SBO. Methods All patients receiving intestinal plication in our hospital were retrospectively collected. Short-term outcome including postoperative complications, reoperation, postoperative ICU stay, starting day of liquid diet and postoperative hospitalization, as well as long-term outcome including recurrence of obstruction, readmission, reoperation and death were compared between groups. Gut function at annual follow-up visits was evaluated as well. Results Nine internal and 11 external candidates were recruited into each group. The major causes of plication were adhesive obstruction, abdominal cocoon, volvulus and intussusception. Lower incidence of postoperative complication (p = 0.043) and shorter postoperative hospitalization (p = 0.049) was observed in internal group. One patient receiving external plication died from anastomosis leakage. During the 5-year follow-up period, the readmission rate was low in both groups (22.2 % vs. 9.1 %), and none of patients required reoperation or deceased. None of patients exhibited gut dysfunction, and all patients restored normal gut function after 4 years. Patients in external group demonstrated accelerated recovery of gut function after surgery. Conclusions This study compares short-term and long-term outcome of patients receiving internal or external intestinal plication. We suggest a conservative attitude toward external plication strategy. Surgical indication for intestinal plication is critical and awaits future investigations.

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention of the LAD: costs and long-term outcome

Perfusion ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-329
Author(s):  
Julia Merkle ◽  
Mohamed Zeriouh ◽  
Anton Sabashnikov ◽  
Farid Azizov ◽  
Christopher Hohmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Graft ◽  
Coronary Intervention ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Percutaneous Coronary

Objective: Outcomes and treatment costs for coronary artery disease involving the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) are influenced by the type of treatment, which can be either isolated minimally invasive revascularization of the LAD using the internal thoracic artery (ITA) (MIDCAB) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on the LAD. This retrospective study sought to evaluate long-term survival, freedom from re-intervention and cost analysis after MIDCAB compared to PCI on the LAD. Methods: Between 2006 and 2012, from a total of 561 patients, 106 consecutive patients with LAD stenosis underwent a MIDCAB procedure whereas 100 patients underwent elective PCI. Urgent and emergent cases were excluded from the present study (n = 355). Detailed analysis of the outcome data was performed for both groups. A Kaplan–Meier survival estimation with up to 10-year follow-up was applied for both groups for survival analysis and freedom from re-intervention. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in terms of clinically relevant baseline characteristics. The outcome in the MIDCAB group was superior regarding long-term overall survival, accounting for 100% versus 92.8% at 1 year, 98.5% versus 82.1% at 6 years and 79.6% versus 61.5% at 10 years (Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) p = 0.011) and freedom from re-intervention at 10 years (97.2% vs. 86.7%, Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) p = 0.001). Intensive care unit (ICU) stay (p = 0.020) and total hospital stay (p<0.001) were significantly longer in the MIDCAB group, which was also associated with higher in-hospital costs (10,879 € vs. 4009 €, p<0.001). Conclusions: Whereas patients undergoing MIDCAB remained longer on ICU and in hospital, causing higher costs, this procedure was associated with a significantly lower incidence of repeat revascularization and significantly lower mortality compared to PCI on the LAD.

scholarly journals Does additional coronary artery bypass grafting to aortic valve replacement in elderly patients affect the early and long-term outcome?

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 487-501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Formica ◽  
Serena Mariani ◽  
Stefano D’Alessandro ◽  
Gurmeet Singh ◽  
Michele Di Mauro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Valve Replacement ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Bypass Grafting ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome

P0792FAT ATTENUATION INDEX OF CORONARY ARTERY IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY PREDICTS LONG-TERM OUTCOME IN CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam-Jun Cho ◽  
Soon hyo Kwon ◽  
Bo Da Nam ◽  
Kyoungin Choi
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Adjusted Risk ◽  
Attenuation Index ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Long Term Mortality

Abstract Background and Aims Perivascular fat attenuation index (FAI) of coronary artery represents the degree of coronary inflammation. High coronary artery FAI in computed tomography angiography (CTA) is associated with increased all-cause and cardiac mortality in general population. However, the ability of the perivascular FAI using coronary CTA to predict long term outcome in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients is unknown. Method This is a single center retrospective study. We analyzed coronary FAIs on CTA for CKD including patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD). The patients with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft were excluded. Mapping and analysis of perivascular FAI were performed around proximal three major coronary arteries. We assessed the prognostic value of FAI of CTA for long-term mortality (data from the Korean National Statistical Office) with Cox regression models, adjusted for age, sex, dialysis vintage, and clinical parameters. Results Between January 2012 and June 2018, 268 CKD patients were included. Mean age of this cohort was 64.5 ± 12.0 years, and 132 (49.3%) participants were men. 109 (44.7%) participants has diabetic kidney disease, and 179 (66.4%) participants were on hemodialysis. Median follow-up after coronary CTA was 29.2 (15.1 − 46.3) months. During follow-up, there were 43 (20.6%) deaths. The optimum cut-off value of FAI around the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was ascertained as -65.5 Hounsfield unit. The high perivascular FAI around the LAD was significantly associated with higher adjusted risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.07–4.32). In ESRD subgroup, the high perivascular FAI group also has higher adjusted risk of all-cause mortality compared to low perivascular FAI group (hazard ratio, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.16–5.09). Conclusion The perivascular FAI around LAD predicts the long-term mortality in patients with CKD. This could provide the chance of early primary intervention in CKD patients.

scholarly journals Straight stem and threaded cup in patients under 60 years of age: 28.8–30.2 years of follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Pisecky ◽  
J. Allerstorfer ◽  
B. Schauer ◽  
G. Hipmair ◽  
R. Hochgatterer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Septic Loosening ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Straight Stem ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Abstract Purpose The aim of this retrospective observational study of one cohort was to evaluate the long-term outcome in patients younger than 60 years after total hip arthroplasty using a straight uncemented stem and an uncemented threaded cup. Methods Between 1986 and 1987, 75 hips of 75 patients (mean age, 53.35 ± 6.17 years) were consecutively implanted with an Alloclassic Zweymüller/Alloclassic SL stem and an Alloclassic CSF cup. Forty-four patients had died over the last 30 years. The remaining 31 patients (mean age, 82.9 ± 6.4 years) were reinvited for follow-up examinations. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were carried out. Results At a mean follow-up of 29.5 (28.8–30.2), 4 patients (5.3%) were lost to follow-up. For the endpoint aseptic loosening (defined as the removal of stem or the cup for 2 cases), the overall survival rate is 97.3%. For the endpoint revision for any reason (22 patients), the survival rate is 70.6%. Eleven patients needed an exchange of head and liner, caused by wear. The average time from implantation until change of head and liner was 21.44 years (SD 5.92). Other reasons for revision surgery were septic loosening (3 cases), aseptic loosening of stem and cup (1 case), aseptic loosening of stem (1 case), periprosthetic calcification (2 cases), implant fracture (1 case), periprosthetic fracture (1 case), intraoperative fissure of stem (1 case), and total wear of liner including cup (1 case). Conclusion The combination of a straight stem (Alloclassic) and a screw cup (CSF) shows excellent results in young patients under the age of 60 at ultra-long-term follow-up at 30 years. Revisions due to wear of the polyethylene liner are more likely than in the older patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document