scholarly journals Genome-Wide Dynamic Evaluation of the UV-Induced DNA Damage Response

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 2981-2988
Author(s):  
Erica Silva ◽  
Manuel Michaca ◽  
Brenton Munson ◽  
Gordon J Bean ◽  
Philipp A Jaeger ◽  
...  

Abstract Genetic screens in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have allowed for the identification of many genes as sensors or effectors of DNA damage, typically by comparing the fitness of genetic mutants in the presence or absence of DNA-damaging treatments. However, these static screens overlook the dynamic nature of DNA damage response pathways, missing time-dependent or transient effects. Here, we examine gene dependencies in the dynamic response to ultraviolet radiation-induced DNA damage by integrating ultra-high-density arrays of 6144 diploid gene deletion mutants with high-frequency time-lapse imaging. We identify 494 ultraviolet radiation response genes which, in addition to recovering molecular pathways and protein complexes previously annotated to DNA damage repair, include components of the CCR4-NOT complex, tRNA wobble modification, autophagy, and, most unexpectedly, 153 nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes. Notably, mitochondria-deficient strains present time-dependent insensitivity to ultraviolet radiation, posing impaired mitochondrial function as a protective factor in the ultraviolet radiation response.

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. eabe3882
Author(s):  
Jenny F. Nathans ◽  
James A. Cornwell ◽  
Marwa M. Afifi ◽  
Debasish Paul ◽  
Steven D. Cappell

The G1-S checkpoint is thought to prevent cells with damaged DNA from entering S phase and replicating their DNA and efficiently arrests cells at the G1-S transition. Here, using time-lapse imaging and single-cell tracking, we instead find that DNA damage leads to highly variable and divergent fate outcomes. Contrary to the textbook model that cells arrest at the G1-S transition, cells triggering the DNA damage checkpoint in G1 phase route back to quiescence, and this cellular rerouting can be initiated at any point in G1 phase. Furthermore, we find that most of the cells receiving damage in G1 phase actually fail to arrest and proceed through the G1-S transition due to persistent cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) activity in the interval between DNA damage and induction of the CDK inhibitor p21. These observations necessitate a revised model of DNA damage response in G1 phase and indicate that cells have a G1 checkpoint.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3104-3104
Author(s):  
Stacie Stone ◽  
Alexandra Sobeck ◽  
Igor Landais ◽  
Weidong Wang ◽  
Maureen Hoatlin

Abstract Fanconi anemia (FA) is an inherited hematological disorder characterized by bone marrow failure, birth defects, and cancer susceptibility, typically leading to squamous cell carcinomas and acute myelogenous leukemia. Twelve FA genes have been described, eight of which function together in a multiprotein, upstream “FA core complex” to mediate the S-phase and DNA damage-induced monoubiquitylation of two downstream proteins, FANCD2 and FANCI. Despite this knowledge the precise function of the FA proteins is not well understood because they function as part of a network of proteins that have not been completely defined. Recently we developed a new animal model for FA research using extracts from the eggs of Xenopus laevis. Xenopus extracts are cell cycle synchronized and contain nuclear proteins that are stockpiled for DNA replication. We showed that FA gene orthologs (xFA), like their human counterparts, form complexes that are required for the monoubiquitylation of xFANCD2 in response to DNA damage. Xenopus laevis extracts are thus a powerful system to analyze the endogenous state of xFA protein complexes and their components in an S phase, replication-competent context. The objective of this study was to isolate protein complexes containing the xFA core complex protein, xFANCM and xFANCM-interacting proteins. Using a co-immunoprecipitation approach followed by mass spectrometry, we identified a novel protein-binding partner of xFANCM (termed xMIP-1, for xFANCM Interacting Protein 1). The interaction was confirmed by reciprocal coimmunoprecipitation in both Xenopus extracts and human cells. Surprisingly, co-fractionation demonstrated that xFANCM was present in two protein complexes during S phase; one containing FA core complex members (<900 kDa) as expected, and another previously undescribed complex (>900 kDa) containing xMIP-1. Because xMIP-1 is a partner protein of xFANCM we wanted to determine if xMIP-1, like xFANCM, was required for the monoubiquitylation of xFANCD2. This was done using a DNA stimulation assay, where upon immunodepletion of xMIP-1 from egg extracts, we were able to observe the monoubiquitylation of xFANCD2 in response to DNA structures as a size shift via immunoblot. The absence of xMIP-1 had no detectable effect on the monoubiquitylation of xFANCD2 suggesting that xMIP-1, unlike xFANCM, was not required for xFANCD2 monoubiquitylation. To explore a functional link between xFANCM and xMIP-1 we used egg extracts to show that xMIP-1, like xFANCM, was recruited to replicating chromatin and exhibited a size shift during the replication process. Furthermore immunodepletion of xFANCM from egg extracts reduced recruitment of xMIP-1 to replicating chromatin, suggesting that xMIP-1 chromatin binding was dependent on xFANCM. In contrast, xMIP-1 recruitment to replicating chromatin was not affected by the immunodepletion of other FA core complex proteins tested, suggesting that xMIP-1 chromatin binding is independent of the FA core complex. To further characterize the observed DNA binding activity of xMIP-1 we used the DNA stimulation assay and several defined DNA structures. Surprisingly xMIP-1 showed a double-stranded DNA stimulated mobility shift similar to those reported previously for xFANCD2 (Sobeck et al., 2007) and xMRE11 (Costanzo et al., 2001) suggesting xMIP-1 may play a role in the DNA damage response. Our data suggests xFANCM is a member of an S phase complex that has not been previously described with a “non-FA” partner protein that may function with xFANCM during the DNA damage response to maintain genomic stability.


2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 601-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viki Swope ◽  
Christina Alexander ◽  
Renny Starner ◽  
Sandy Schwemberger ◽  
George Babcock ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e0129438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Georgescu ◽  
Alma Osseiran ◽  
Maria Rojec ◽  
Yueyong Liu ◽  
Maxime Bombrun ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 70 (a1) ◽  
pp. C1642-C1642
Author(s):  
Aya Toma ◽  
Tomio Takahashi ◽  
Yusuke Sato ◽  
Sakurako Goto-Ito ◽  
Atsushi Yamagata ◽  
...  

Double-strand break (DSB) and interstrand crosslink (ICL) are serious damages in DNA. Responses to these DNA damages include ubiquitination of damaged chromatin and other substrates, which recruit protein complexes required for DNA repair. Therefore, many proteins involved in DNA damage response contain ubiquitin-binding modules. For instance, a ubiquitin ligase RNF168, which catalyzes K63-linked polyubiquitination of histone H2A, contains two types of ubiquitin binding motifs, MIU (motif interacting with ubiquitin) and UIM (UIM and MIU-related Ub-binding domain). FAAP20, which recruits Fanconi anemia proteins (crosslink-repair factors), contains a UBZ (ubiquitin-binding zinc finger) domain. To date, mechanisms for ubiquitin recognition by UMI and UBZ domains have remained unclear. In this study, we determined crystal structures of RNF168 UMI and FAAP20 UBZ in complex with ubiquitin at 1.9 Å resolutions, respectively. SPR analyses using UMI and UBZ mutants, which were designed to disrupt Ub binding, confirmed that the observed interactions between Ub and UMI or UBZ are critical for binding. Our structure and the accompanying in-vitro structure-based mutagenesis experiments reveal the structural basis of these important recognition events.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fen Yang ◽  
Jianji Chen ◽  
Bin Liu ◽  
Guozhen Gao ◽  
Manu Sebastian ◽  
...  

AbstractSPINDOC is tightly associated with the histone H3K4me3 effector protein SPIN1. To gain a better understanding of the biological roles of SPINDOC, we identified its interacting proteins. Unexpectedly, SPINDOC forms two mutually exclusive protein complexes, one with SPIN1 and the other with PARP1. Consistent with its ability to directly interact with PARP1, SPINDOC expression is induced by DNA damage, likely by KLF4, and recruited to DNA lesions with dynamics that follows PARP1. In SPINDOC knockout cells, the levels of PARylation are reduced, in both the absence and presence of DNA damage. The SPINDOC/PARP1 interaction promotes the clearance of PARP1 from damaged DNA, and also impacts the expression of known transcriptional targets of PARP1. To address the in vivo roles of SPINDOC in PARP1 regulation, we generate SPINDOC knockout mice, which are viable, but slightly smaller than their wildtype counterparts. The KO mice display reduced levels of PARylation and, like PARP1 KO mice, are hypersensitive to IR-induced DNA damage. The findings identify a SPIN1-independent role for SPINDOC in the regulation of PARP1-mediated PARylation and the DNA damage response.


Oncotarget ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 1912-1926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arun Pradhan ◽  
Vladimir Ustiyan ◽  
Yufang Zhang ◽  
Tanya V. Kalin ◽  
Vladimir V. Kalinichenko

2010 ◽  
Vol 285 (13) ◽  
pp. 9858-9867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satoru Mimura ◽  
Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi ◽  
Satoru Ishii ◽  
Emiko Noro ◽  
Tomoya Katsura ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erika Shor ◽  
Rocio Garcia-Rubio ◽  
Lucius DeGregorio ◽  
David S. Perlin

ABSTRACTTo protect genome integrity, eukaryotic cells respond to DNA damage by triggering highly conserved checkpoint mechanisms involving the phosphorylation of Rad53/CHK2 kinase. Budding yeast Candida glabrata, closely related to model eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is an opportunistic pathogen characterized by high genetic diversity and rapid emergence of drug resistant mutants. However, the mechanisms enabling this genetic variability are unclear. Here we show that C. glabrata cells exposed to DNA damage neither induce CgRad53 phosphorylation nor accumulate in S phase, and exhibit higher lethality than S. cerevisiae. Furthermore, time-lapse microscopy showed C. glabrata cells continuing to divide in the presence of DNA damage, resulting in mitotic errors and cell death. Finally, RNAseq analysis revealed transcriptional rewiring of the DNA damage response in C. glabrata and identified several key protectors of genome stability upregulated by DNA damage in S. cerevisiae but downregulated in C. glabrata, including PCNA. Together, our results reveal a non-canonical fungal DNA damage response, which may contribute to rapidly generating genetic change and drug resistance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document