scholarly journals Fork Stalling and Template Switching As a Mechanism for Polyalanine Tract Expansion Affecting the DYC Mutant of HOXD13, a New Murine Model of Synpolydactyly

Genetics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 183 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olivier Cocquempot ◽  
Véronique Brault ◽  
Charles Babinet ◽  
Yann Herault
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lewis J Bainbridge ◽  
Rebecca Teague ◽  
Aidan J Doherty

Abstract To bypass a diverse range of fork stalling impediments encountered during genome replication, cells possess a variety of DNA damage tolerance (DDT) mechanisms including translesion synthesis, template switching, and fork reversal. These pathways function to bypass obstacles and allow efficient DNA synthesis to be maintained. In addition, lagging strand obstacles can also be circumvented by downstream priming during Okazaki fragment generation, leaving gaps to be filled post-replication. Whether repriming occurs on the leading strand has been intensely debated over the past half-century. Early studies indicated that both DNA strands were synthesised discontinuously. Although later studies suggested that leading strand synthesis was continuous, leading to the preferred semi-discontinuous replication model. However, more recently it has been established that replicative primases can perform leading strand repriming in prokaryotes. An analogous fork restart mechanism has also been identified in most eukaryotes, which possess a specialist primase called PrimPol that conducts repriming downstream of stalling lesions and structures. PrimPol also plays a more general role in maintaining efficient fork progression. Here, we review and discuss the historical evidence and recent discoveries that substantiate repriming as an intrinsic replication restart pathway for maintaining efficient genome duplication across all domains of life.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (14) ◽  
pp. 7163-7181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bas Pilzecker ◽  
Olimpia Alessandra Buoninfante ◽  
Heinz Jacobs

AbstractThe DNA damage response network guards the stability of the genome from a plethora of exogenous and endogenous insults. An essential feature of the DNA damage response network is its capacity to tolerate DNA damage and structural impediments during DNA synthesis. This capacity, referred to as DNA damage tolerance (DDT), contributes to replication fork progression and stability in the presence of blocking structures or DNA lesions. Defective DDT can lead to a prolonged fork arrest and eventually cumulate in a fork collapse that involves the formation of DNA double strand breaks. Four principal modes of DDT have been distinguished: translesion synthesis, fork reversal, template switching and repriming. All DDT modes warrant continuation of replication through bypassing the fork stalling impediment or repriming downstream of the impediment in combination with filling of the single-stranded DNA gaps. In this way, DDT prevents secondary DNA damage and critically contributes to genome stability and cellular fitness. DDT plays a key role in mutagenesis, stem cell maintenance, ageing and the prevention of cancer. This review provides an overview of the role of DDT in these aspects.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 2188-2203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia M.B. Carvalho ◽  
Feng Zhang ◽  
Pengfei Liu ◽  
Ankita Patel ◽  
Trilochan Sahoo ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 567-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsuka Matsui ◽  
Tatsuya Ihara ◽  
Hiraku Suda ◽  
Hirofumi Mikami ◽  
Kentaro Semba

AbstractGene amplification was recognized as a physiological process during the development of Drosophila melanogaster. Intriguingly, mammalian cells use this mechanism to overexpress particular genes for survival under stress, such as during exposure to cytotoxic drugs. One well-known example is the amplification of the dihydrofolate reductase gene observed in methotrexate-resistant cells. Four models have been proposed for the generation of amplifications: extrareplication and recombination, the breakage-fusion-bridge cycle, double rolling-circle replication, and replication fork stalling and template switching. Gene amplification is a typical genetic alteration in cancer, and historically many oncogenes have been identified in the amplified regions. In this regard, novel cancer-associated genes may remain to be identified in the amplified regions. Recent comprehensive approaches have further revealed that co-amplified genes also contribute to tumorigenesis in concert with known oncogenes in the same amplicons. Considering that cancer develops through the alteration of multiple genes, gene amplification is an effective acceleration machinery to promote tumorigenesis. Identification of cancer-associated genes could provide novel and effective therapeutic targets.


2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (08) ◽  
pp. 264-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoling You ◽  
Kun Chi ◽  
Yeling Lu ◽  
Qiulan Ding ◽  
Jing Dai ◽  
...  

SummaryIntron 1 inversion (Inv1) is a recurrent causative mutation of haemophilia A (HA) and is responsible for 1–5% of severe HA. Inv1 occurs as a result of intra-chromosomal homologous recombination between int1h-1 within intron 1 and int1h-2 located in approximately 125 kb telomeric to the F8 gene. In this report, we presented a previously undescribed aberrant type of Inv1 with complex genomic rearrangement in a pedigree with severe HA. The breakpoints of the rearrangement were identified by the genome walking technique; copy number variations (CNVs) of the F8 gene and X chromosome were detected by AccuCopy technique, Affymetrix CytoScan HD CNV assay and quantitative PCR (qPCR); the F8 transcripts related to the aberrant Inv1 were analysed by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR). We have characterised the exact breakpoints of the complex rearrangement, and determined the location and size of the insertion and deletion. The rearrangements can be summarised as an aberrant pattern of Inv1 with a deletion of 2.56 kb and a duplication of 227.3 kb inserted in the rejoining junction within the F8 gene. Our results suggested that this complex genomic rearrangement was generated by two distinct repair mechanisms of fork stalling and template switching/microhomology-mediated break-induced replication (FoSTeS/MMBIR) and nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR).


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A685-A685
Author(s):  
B SINGH ◽  
V MALMSTROM ◽  
F POWRIE

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 132-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean P. Hedican ◽  
Eric R. Wilkinson ◽  
Thomas F. Warner ◽  
Fred T. Lee ◽  
Stephen Y. Nakada

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document