scholarly journals Differential Contributions of DNA-Binding Proteins to Polycomb Response Element Activity at the Drosophila giant Gene

Genetics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 214 (3) ◽  
pp. 623-634
Author(s):  
Elnaz Ghotbi ◽  
Kristina Lackey ◽  
Vicki Wong ◽  
Katie T. Thompson ◽  
Evan G. Caston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Dna Binding Proteins ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Element Activity

Polycomb-group (PcG) proteins are evolutionarily conserved epigenetic regulators whose primary function is to maintain the transcriptional repression of target genes. Recruitment of Drosophila melanogaster PcG proteins to target genes requires the presence of one or more Polycomb Response Elements (PREs). The functions or necessity for more than one PRE at a gene are not clear and individual PREs at some loci may have distinct regulatory roles. Various combinations of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins are present at a given PRE, but only Pleiohomeotic (Pho) is present at all strong PREs. The giant (gt) locus has two PREs, a proximal PRE1 and a distal PRE2. During early embryonic development, Pho binds to PRE1 ∼30-min prior to stable binding to PRE2. This observation indicated a possible dependence of PRE2 on PRE1 for PcG recruitment; however, we find here that PRE2 recruits PcG proteins and maintains transcriptional repression independently of Pho binding to PRE1. Pho-like (Phol) is partially redundant with Pho during larval development and binds to the same DNA sequences in vitro. Although binding of Pho to PRE1 is dependent on the presence of consensus Pho-Phol-binding sites, Phol binding is less so and appears to play a minimal role in recruiting other PcG proteins to gt. Another PRE-binding protein, Sp1/Kruppel-like factor, is dependent on the presence of Pho for PRE1 binding. Further, we show that, in addition to silencing gene expression, PcG proteins dampen transcription of an active gene.

scholarly journals Transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a SIN3-LexA fusion protein

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1805-1814
Author(s):  
H Wang ◽  
D J Stillman
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Dna Binding Proteins ◽  
Predicted Amino Acid Sequence

The yeast SIN3 gene (also known as SDI1, UME4, RPD1, and GAM2) has been identified as a transcriptional regulator. Previous work has led to the suggestion that SIN3 regulates transcription via interactions with DNA-binding proteins. Although the SIN3 protein is located in the nucleus, it does not bind directly to DNA in vitro. We have expressed a LexA-SIN3 fusion protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and show that this fusion protein represses transcription from heterologous promoters that contain lexA operators. The predicted amino acid sequence of the SIN3 protein contains four copies of a paired amphipathic helix (PAH) motif, similar to motifs found in HLH (helix-loop-helix) and TPR (tetratricopeptide repeat) proteins, and these motifs are proposed to be involved in protein-protein interactions. We have conducted a deletion analysis of the SIN3 gene and show that the PAH motifs are required for SIN3 activity. Additionally, the C-terminal region of the SIN3 protein is sufficient for repression activity in a LexA-SIN3 fusion, and deletion of a PAH motif in this region inactivates this repression activity. A model is presented in which SIN3 recognizes specific DNA-binding proteins in vivo in order to repress transcription.

scholarly journals Components of the ESCRT Pathway, DFG16, and YGR122w Are Required for Rim101 To Act as a Corepressor with Nrg1 at the Negative Regulatory Element of the DIT1 Gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (15) ◽  
pp. 6772-6788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Rothfels ◽  
Jason C. Tanny ◽  
Enikö Molnar ◽  
Helena Friesen ◽  
Cosimo Commisso ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Regulatory Element ◽  
Active Form ◽  
Dna Binding Proteins ◽  
Negative Regulatory Element

ABSTRACT The divergently transcribed DIT1 and DIT2 genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which belong to the mid-late class of sporulation-specific genes, are subject to Ssn6-Tup1-mediated repression in mitotic cells. The Ssn6-Tup1 complex, which is required for repression of diverse sets of coordinately regulated genes, is known to be recruited to target genes by promoter-specific DNA-binding proteins. In this study, we show that a 42-bp negative regulatory element (NRE) present in the DIT1-DIT2 intergenic region consists of two distinct subsites and that a multimer of each subsite supports efficient Ssn6-Tup1-dependent repression of a CYC1-lacZ reporter gene. By genetic screening procedures, we identified DFG16, YGR122w, VPS36, and the DNA-binding proteins Rim101 and Nrg1 as potential mediators of NRE-directed repression. We show that Nrg1 and Rim101 bind simultaneously to adjacent target sites within the NRE in vitro and act as corepressors in vivo. We have found that the ability of Rim101 to be proteolytically processed to its active form and mediate NRE-directed repression not only depends on the previously characterized RIM signaling pathway but also requires Dfg16, Ygr122w, and components of the ESCRT trafficking pathway. Interestingly, Rim101 was processed in bro1 and doa4 strains but was unable to mediate efficient repression.

scholarly journals Efficient and Specific Targeting of Polycomb Group Proteins Requires Cooperative Interaction between Grainyhead and Pleiohomeotic

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 1434-1444 ◽  
Author(s):  
András Blastyák ◽  
Rakesh K. Mishra ◽  
Francois Karch ◽  
Henrik Gyurkovics
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
Dna Binding Proteins ◽  
Polycomb Group ◽  
Cooperative Interaction ◽  
Protein Protein Interaction ◽  
Specific Targeting

ABSTRACT Specific targeting of the protein complexes formed by the Polycomb group of proteins is critically required to maintain the inactive state of a group of developmentally regulated genes. Although the role of DNA binding proteins in this process has been well established, it is still not understood how these proteins target the Polycomb complexes specifically to their response elements. Here we show that the grainyhead gene, which encodes a DNA binding protein, interacts with one such Polycomb response element of the bithorax complex. Grainyhead binds to this element in vitro. Moreover, grainyhead interacts genetically with pleiohomeotic in a transgene-based, pairing-dependent silencing assay. Grainyhead also interacts with Pleiohomeotic in vitro, which facilitates the binding of both proteins to their respective target DNAs. Such interactions between two DNA binding proteins could provide the basis for the cooperative assembly of a nucleoprotein complex formed in vitro. Based on these results and the available data, we propose that the role of DNA binding proteins in Polycomb group-dependent silencing could be described by a model very similar to that of an enhanceosome, wherein the unique arrangement of protein-protein interaction modules exposed by the cooperatively interacting DNA binding proteins provides targeting specificity.

scholarly journals Transcriptional repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a SIN3-LexA fusion protein.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1805-1814 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Wang ◽  
D J Stillman
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Dna Binding Proteins ◽  
Predicted Amino Acid Sequence

The yeast SIN3 gene (also known as SDI1, UME4, RPD1, and GAM2) has been identified as a transcriptional regulator. Previous work has led to the suggestion that SIN3 regulates transcription via interactions with DNA-binding proteins. Although the SIN3 protein is located in the nucleus, it does not bind directly to DNA in vitro. We have expressed a LexA-SIN3 fusion protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and show that this fusion protein represses transcription from heterologous promoters that contain lexA operators. The predicted amino acid sequence of the SIN3 protein contains four copies of a paired amphipathic helix (PAH) motif, similar to motifs found in HLH (helix-loop-helix) and TPR (tetratricopeptide repeat) proteins, and these motifs are proposed to be involved in protein-protein interactions. We have conducted a deletion analysis of the SIN3 gene and show that the PAH motifs are required for SIN3 activity. Additionally, the C-terminal region of the SIN3 protein is sufficient for repression activity in a LexA-SIN3 fusion, and deletion of a PAH motif in this region inactivates this repression activity. A model is presented in which SIN3 recognizes specific DNA-binding proteins in vivo in order to repress transcription.

scholarly journals Thermodynamic Model for B-Z Transition of DNA Induced by Z-DNA Binding Proteins

Molecules ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 2748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ae-Ree Lee ◽  
Na-Hyun Kim ◽  
Yeo-Jin Seo ◽  
Seo-Ree Choi ◽  
Joon-Hwa Lee
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Genomic Dna ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Dna Binding Proteins ◽  
Multiple Sequence ◽  
Left Handed ◽  
Transition Mechanism ◽  
Dna Strands ◽  
Z Dna

Z-DNA is stabilized by various Z-DNA binding proteins (ZBPs) that play important roles in RNA editing, innate immune response, and viral infection. In this review, the structural and dynamics of various ZBPs complexed with Z-DNA are summarized to better understand the mechanisms by which ZBPs selectively recognize d(CG)-repeat DNA sequences in genomic DNA and efficiently convert them to left-handed Z-DNA to achieve their biological function. The intermolecular interaction of ZBPs with Z-DNA strands is mediated through a single continuous recognition surface which consists of an α3 helix and a β-hairpin. In the ZBP-Z-DNA complexes, three identical, conserved residues (N173, Y177, and W195 in the Zα domain of human ADAR1) play central roles in the interaction with Z-DNA. ZBPs convert a 6-base DNA pair to a Z-form helix via the B-Z transition mechanism in which the ZBP first binds to B-DNA and then shifts the equilibrium from B-DNA to Z-DNA, a conformation that is then selectively stabilized by the additional binding of a second ZBP molecule. During B-Z transition, ZBPs selectively recognize the alternating d(CG)n sequence and convert it to a Z-form helix in long genomic DNA through multiple sequence discrimination steps. In addition, the intermediate complex formed by ZBPs and B-DNA, which is modulated by varying conditions, determines the degree of B-Z transition.

scholarly journals The Caenorhabditis elegans Heterochronic Regulator LIN-14 Is a Novel Transcription Factor That Controls the Developmental Timing of Transcription from the Insulin/Insulin-Like Growth Factor Gene ins-33 by Direct DNA Binding

2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (24) ◽  
pp. 11059-11072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Hristova ◽  
Darcy Birse ◽  
Yang Hong ◽  
Victor Ambros
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Insulin Like Growth Factor ◽  
Consensus Binding Site

ABSTRACT A temporal gradient of the novel nuclear protein LIN-14 specifies the timing and sequence of stage-specific developmental events in Caenorhabditis elegans. The profound effects of lin-14 mutations on worm development suggest that LIN-14 directly or indirectly regulates stage-specific gene expression. We show that LIN-14 can associate with chromatin in vivo and has in vitro DNA binding activity. A bacterially expressed C-terminal domain of LIN-14 was used to select DNA sequences that contain a putative consensus binding site from a pool of randomized double-stranded oligonucleotides. To identify candidates for genes directly regulated by lin-14, we employed DNA microarray hybridization to compare the mRNA abundance of C. elegans genes in wild-type animals to that in mutants with reduced or elevated lin-14 activity. Five of the candidate LIN-14 target genes identified by microarrays, including the insulin/insulin-like growth factor family gene ins-33, contain putative LIN-14 consensus sites in their upstream DNA sequences. Genetic analysis indicates that the developmental regulation of ins-33 mRNA involves the stage-specific repression of ins-33 transcription by LIN-14 via sequence-specific DNA binding. These results reinforce the conclusion that lin-14 encodes a novel class of transcription factor.

scholarly journals Grammatical analysis of DNA sequences provides a rationale for the regulatory control of an entire chromosome

1990 ◽  
Vol 56 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 115-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susumu Ohno
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Somatic Hybrids ◽  
Dna Binding Proteins ◽  
Regulatory Control ◽  
Banding Patterns ◽  
High Frequencies ◽  
Grammatical Analysis ◽  
Grammatical Rule

SummaryRegardless of their origins, functions, and base compositions, all DNAs are scriptures written following the same grammatical rule. At the level of syllables, two, CG and TA are seldom used, while three, TG, CT and CA are utilized with abundance. Accordingly, at the level of three-letter words, two complementary base trimers, CTG and CAG, invariably enjoy frequent usage. Inasmuch as two of the three frequently used syllables, TG and CA are complementary to each other, while two seldom used syllables, CG and TA, are both palindromes, two complementary strands of DNA are inherently symmetrical with each other. Consequently, palindromic sequences as favourite targets of DNA-binding proteins occur at unsuspectedly high frequencies, if they contain TG and CA or CTG and CAG. Nevertheless, there are grammatical rules operating among these high frequency palindromes as well; e.g. the palindromic tetramer TGCA occurs nearly two times more often than its reciprocal; CATG. Thus, DNA-binding proteins are provided with a wealth of abundant targets whose densities are influenced by a regional difference in GC/AT ratios to variable degrees. One palindromic heptamer CAGNCTG is an ideal target of one DNA-binding protein engaged in chromosome packaging and in generation of banding patterns. This heptamer occurs once every 1000 bases in moderately GC-rich sequences, while its incidence is reduced to once every 3000 bases in extremely AT-rich sequences. The above must be the very reason that a solitary human X-chromosome DNA coated with mouse DNA-binding proteins in mouse-man somatic hybrids still maintains the original banding pattern and that the inactive X remains inactive, while the active X remains active.

scholarly journals Adenovirus E1B 55-Kilodalton Oncoprotein Inhibits p53 Acetylation by PCAF

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (15) ◽  
pp. 5540-5553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Liu ◽  
April L. Colosimo ◽  
Xiang-Jiao Yang ◽  
Daiqing Liao
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Dna Binding Activity ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Adenovirus E1b

ABSTRACT The adenovirus E1B 55-kDa protein binds to cellular tumor suppressor p53 and inactivates its transcriptional transactivation function. p53 transactivation activity is dependent upon its ability to bind to specific DNA sequences near the promoters of its target genes. It was shown recently that p53 is acetylated by transcriptional coactivators p300, CREB bidning protein (CBP), and PCAF and that acetylation of p53 by these proteins enhances p53 sequence-specific DNA binding. Here we show that the E1B 55-kDa protein specifically inhibits p53 acetylation by PCAF in vivo and in vitro, while acetylation of histones and PCAF autoacetylation is not affected. Furthermore, the DNA-binding activity of p53 is diminished in cells expressing the E1B 55-kDa protein. PCAF binds to the E1B 55-kDa protein and to a region near the C terminus of p53 encompassing Lys-320, the specific PCAF acetylation site. We further show that the E1B 55-kDa protein interferes with the physical interaction between PCAF and p53, suggesting that the E1B 55-kDa protein inhibits PCAF acetylase function on p53 by preventing enzyme-substrate interaction. These results underscore the importance of p53 acetylation for its function and suggest that inhibition of p53 acetylation by viral oncoproteins prevent its activation, thereby contributing to viral transformation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document