Factors that may interfere in estradiol-progesterone plasmatic concentration in the mid-luteal phase of hyperstimulated cycles for IVF/ICSI

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodopiano de Souza Florêncio
Keyword(s):  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Influence Factor ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Important Variable ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Beta Hcg ◽  
Final Maturation ◽  
Hormonal Evaluation ◽  
Plasmatic Concentration

Research question: We have demonstrated that plasmatic estradiol in mid-luteal phasel has prognostic value for clinical and ongoing pregnancy rate. This study investigated the possible factors that could interfere in the value of estradiol-progesterone in the mid luteal phase of cycles of IVF/ICSI Design: Retrospective study, including patients ≤39years old and with dosage of estradiol-progesterone and beta hCG 6-7 days after fresh embryo transfer and the influence of several factors or variables upon these hormones. Results: Of 189 cycles of IVF/ICSI with complete hormonal evaluation in mid-luteal phase, we studied the probably influence of ten factors upon plasmatic concentration of estradiol-progesterone. Only four factors had significant influence. Of them, the most important variable was beta hCG concentration (consequence of trophoblastic mass and number of implanted embryos), followed for number collected oocytes, and of litlle importance, scheme of final maturation with luteal phase correction (did not reach statistical difference), and day of transfer. Conclusion: The estradiol-progesterone in the mid-luteal phase, in this research, were influenced by hCG, number of collected oocytes, scheme for final maturation, but the main influence factor was the beta hCG concentration, although not had been a good correlation coefficient between these hormones, due to a large difference in the their concentrations, as seen in the high values observed on the Standard Deviation. The high percentages of clinical and ongoing pregnancies in the ≥500g/ml group, were the result of higher beta hCG levels, due to the larger number of twin pregnancy in this group.

P–667 Dydrogesterone supplementation in cycles triggered with lone GnRH agonist for final oocyte maturation resulted in an acceptable pregnancy rate

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Safrai ◽  
S Hertsberg ◽  
A Be Meir ◽  
B Reubinoff ◽  
T Imbar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Gnrh Agonist ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Luteal Support ◽  
Luteal Phase Support ◽  
Gnrh Agonist Trigger ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Agonist Trigger

Abstract Study question Can luteal oral Dydrogesterone (Duphaston) supplementation in an antagonist cycle after a lone GnRH agonist trigger rescue the luteal phase, allowing the possibility to peruse with fresh embryo transfer? Summary answer Functionality of the luteal phase in an antagonist cycle after a lone GnRH agonist trigger can be restored by adding Duphaston to conventional luteal support. What is known already Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is dramatically reduced when using antagonist cycle with lone GnRH agonist trigger before ovum pick up. This trigger induces short luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) peaks, associated with reduced progesterone and estrogen levels during the luteal phase. They cause an inadequate luteal phase and a significantly reduced implantation rate leading to a freeze all practice in those cycles. Study design, size, duration A retrospective cohort study. The study group (n = 123) included women that underwent in vitro fertilization cycles from January 2017 to May 2020. Patients received a GnRH-antagonist with a lone GnRH-agonist trigger due to imminent OSHH. The control group (n = 374) included patients under 35 years old that, during the same time period, underwent a standard antagonist protocol with a dual trigger of a GnRH-agonist and hCG. Participants/materials, setting, methods Study patients were given Dydrogesterone (Duphaston) in addition to micronized progesterone vaginal pills (Utrogestan) for luteal support (Duphaston group). Controls were treated conventionally with Utrogestan for luteal phase support (hCG group). The outcomes measured were pregnancy rate and OHSS events. Main results and the role of chance Our study was the first to evaluate the addition of Duphaston to standard luteal phase support in an antagonist cycle triggered by a lone GnRH agonist before a fresh embryo transfer. The mean number of oocytes retrieved and estradiol plasma levels were significantly higher in the Duphaston group than in the hCG group (16.9 ±7.7 vs. 10.8 ± 5.3 and 11658 ± 5280 pmol/L vs. 6048 ± 3059 pmol/L, respectively). The fertilization rate was comparable between the two groups. The mean number of embryos transferred and the clinical pregnancy rate were also comparable between groups (1.5 ± 0.6 vs 1.5 ± 0.5 and 46.3% vs 40.9%, respectively). No OHSS event was reported in either group. Limitations, reasons for caution This retrospective study may carry an inherent selection and information bias, derived from medical record coding. An additional limitation was the choice of physician for the lone GnRH trigger, which may have introduced a selection bias and another potential caveat was the relatively small sample size of our study groups. Wider implications of the findings: The addition of Duphaston to conventional luteal support could effectively salvage the luteal phase without increasing the risk for OHSS. This enables, to peruse in those cycle, with fresh embryo transfer, avoiding the need to freeze all the embryos and postponed embryo transfer. Leading to lower psychological burden and costs. Trial registration number 0632–20-HMO

scholarly journals Pulsatile secretory characteristics of allopregnanolone, a neuroactive steroid, during the menstrual cycle and in amenorrheic subjects

2002 ◽  
pp. 347-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
AD Genazzani ◽  
M Luisi ◽  
B Malavasi ◽  
C Strucchi ◽  
S Luisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Menstrual Cycle ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Pulse Amplitude ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Neuroactive Steroid ◽  
Hypothalamic Amenorrhea ◽  
Temporal Coupling ◽  
Serum Gonadotropin ◽  
Hormonal Evaluation ◽  
Neuroendocrine Functions

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether allopregnanolone, a neuroactive steroid involved in modulating behavioural and neuroendocrine functions, shows episodic secretion in eumenorrheic women, during the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle, and in women with stress-induced amenorrhea. PATIENTS: Six eumenorrheic women and 14 women with hypothalamic amenorrhea were enrolled for the present study. METHODS: All subjects underwent hormonal evaluation in baseline conditions and a pulsatility study to determine LH, cortisol and allopregnanolone episodic release. Eumenorrheic subjects were investigated twice, in the follicular phase (days 3-7) and in the luteal phase (days 18-22) of the menstrual cycle. LH, FSH, prolactin, estradiol, phosphate, DHEA, allopregnanolone and cortisol levels were evaluated in each case. RESULTS: In healthy women, serum gonadotropin and gonadal steroid levels were significantly lower (P<0.01 and P<0.05 respectively) than those in amenorrheic subjects. Allopregnanolone was higher in amenorrheic subjects and during the luteal phase, compared with the follicular phase, of eumenorrheic subjects (P<0.01). Pulse analysis revealed a significant episodic discharge of allopregnanolone in all subjects (follicular phase 6.5+/-0.3 peaks/6 h and luteal phase 5.5+/-0.4 peaks/6 h, hypothalamic amenorrhea 7.0+/-0.7 peaks/6 h) with higher pulse amplitude in amenorrheic subjects and during the luteal phase compared with the follicular phase of the eumenorrheic subjects (P<0.05). Moreover, the specific concordance index demonstrated that allopregnanolone is coupled with LH only during the luteal phase of the cycle and with cortisol during both phases. Allopregnanolone-cortisol coupling was also observed in amenorrheic subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Allopregnanolone is secreted episodically. Both the ovary and adrenal glands release this steroid hormone and it shows temporal coupling with LH only during the luteal phase, with cortisol during both the studied phases of the menstrual cycle in eumenorrheic women and again with cortisol in hypothalamic amenorrheic patients.

scholarly journals Luteal Phase Progesterone Support Does Not Improve Ongoing Pregnancies in True Natural Cycle Cryopreserved Blastocyst Stage Embryo Transfers

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Waldman ◽  
Catherine Racowsky ◽  
Emily Disler ◽  
Ann Thomas ◽  
Lanes Andrea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Abortion Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Natural Cycle ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Luteal Phase Support ◽  
Progesterone Supplementation ◽  
Natural Cycles

Abstract Background: More than 67% of all embryos transferred in the United States involve frozen-thawed embryos. Progesterone supplementation is necessary in medicated cycles in order to luteinize the endometrium and prepare it for implantation, but little data is available if this is necessary in true natural cycles. We evaluated the use of progesterone luteal phase supplementation for cryopreserved/warmed blastocyst transfers in natural cycles not using an ovulatory trigger.Methods: Retrospective cohort study in a single academic medical center. We studied the use of progesterone supplementation beginning in the luteal phase and continued until 10 weeks gestational age in patients undergoing true natural cycle cryopreserved blastocyst transfer. Our outcome measures were ongoing pregnancy rate, positive serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) level, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage/abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and multifetal gestation rate. Categorical data were analyzed utilizing Fisher’s exact test and non-parametric data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank sum test. We a priori adjusted for age.Results: 229 patients were included in the analysis with 149 receiving luteal phase progesterone supplementation and 80 receiving no luteal phase support. Patient demographic and cycle characteristics, and embryo quality were similar between the two groups. No difference was seen in ongoing pregnancy rate (49.0% vs. 47.5%, p=0.8738), clinical pregnancy rate (50.3% vs. 47.5%, p= 0.7483), positive HCG rate (62.4% vs. 57.5%, p=0.5965), miscarriage/abortion rate (5.4% vs. 2.5%, p=0.2622), ectopic pregnancy rate (0% vs. 1.3%, p=0.3493), or multifetal gestations (7.4% vs. 3.8%, p=0.3166).Conclusion(s): The addition of progesterone luteal phase support in true natural cycle cryopreserved blastocyst transfers does not improve cycle outcomes. Capsule: Progesterone supplementation as luteal phase support in true natural cycle cryopreserved blastocyst transfers does not improve ongoing pregnancies.

scholarly journals KASEKTEN PEREMPUAN DI PESANTREN: PONDOK PESULUKAN THORIQOT AGUNG TULUNGAGUNG

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravika Alvin Puspitasari ◽  
Budi Harianto
Keyword(s):  
Research Question ◽  
Secondary Level ◽  
Boarding School ◽  
Important Variable ◽  
Qualitative Approach ◽  
Female Students ◽  
Women's Spirituality ◽  
Or Education ◽  
Social Facts ◽  
Magical Power

In Javanese Islamic discourse in general, Javanese scholars look more at the broad horizon of Sufistic teachings and practices as an important variable in the Islamization of Java. The author feels that the micro area that discusses daily spirituality, especially women's spirituality, is an area of study that is worthy of research. In the practice of spirituality, of course, it cannot be separated from magical power, it is believed to have supernatural powers. The power is obtained in practice or penijazahan. Then there are various theories about mysticism, kebatinan to sects, in fact women are also actively involved in cosmology or social facts in Java. Therefore, the author poses a research question, namely, why the position of women in the narrative of daily spirituality is considered secondary and how is the practice of kasekten in Pondok Pesulukan Tharekat Agung. This paper specifically discusses the practice of spirituality or female students at the Thoriqot Agung Islamic boarding school in Tulungagung district. Practice or education is generally known as the path that can lead a person to gain enlightenment (sakti). This study uses an ethnographic-based qualitative approach. The findings of this study explain that sociological aspects and patriarchal religious interpretations condition women's spirituality to always be at a secondary level. Women who engage in spiritual practice cannot get the same degree as men, such as becoming Murshid, even though they are already spiritually established. Thus, women are only counted as students in the Tarekat and are not as charismatic as men who hold the title of Kyai Tarekat.

The freeze-all strategy versus agonist triggering with low-dose hCG for luteal phase support in IVF/ICSI for high responders: a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 2808-2818 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Santos-Ribeiro ◽  
Shari Mackens ◽  
Biljana Popovic-Todorovic ◽  
Annalisa Racca ◽  
Nikolaos P Polyzos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Gnrh Agonist ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Pregnancy Rates ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Luteal Phase Support ◽  
Low Dose Hcg ◽  
Severe Ohss

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does the freeze-all strategy in high-responders increase pregnancy rates and improve safety outcomes when compared with GnRH agonist triggering followed by low-dose hCG intensified luteal support with a fresh embryo transfer? SUMMARY ANSWER Pregnancy rates after either fresh embryo transfer with intensified luteal phase support using low-dose hCG or the freeze-all strategy did not vary significantly; however, moderate-to-severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) occurred more frequently in the women who attempted a fresh embryo transfer. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Two strategies following GnRH agonist triggering (the freeze-all approach and a fresh embryo transfer attempt using a low-dose of hCG for intensified luteal phase support) are safer alternatives when compared with conventional hCG triggering with similar pregnancy outcomes. However, these two strategies have never been compared head-to-head in an unrestricted predicted hyper-responder population. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This study included women with an excessive response to ovarian stimulation (≥18 follicles measuring ≥11 mm) undergoing IVF/ICSI in a GnRH antagonist suppressed cycle between 2014 and 2017. Our primary outcome was clinical pregnancy at 7 weeks after the first embryo transfer. Secondary outcomes included live birth and the development of moderate-to-severe OHSS. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Following GnRH agonist triggering, women were randomized either to cryopreserve all good-quality embryos followed by a frozen embryo transfer in an subsequent artificial cycle or to perform a fresh embryo transfer with intensified luteal phase support (1500 IU hCG on the day of oocyte retrieval, plus oral estradiol 2 mg two times a day, plus 200 mg of micronized vaginal progesterone three times a day). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 212 patients (106 in each arm) were recruited in the study, with three patients (one in the fresh embryo transfer group and two in the freeze-all group) later withdrawing their consent to participate in the study. One patient in the freeze-all group became pregnant naturally (clinical pregnancy diagnosed 38 days after randomization) prior to the first frozen embryo transfer. The study arms did not vary significantly in terms of the number of oocytes retrieved and embryos produced/transferred. The intention to treat clinical pregnancy and live birth rates (with the latter excluding four cases lost to follow-up: one in the fresh transfer and three in the freeze-all arms, respectively) after the first embryo transfer did not vary significantly among the fresh embryo transfer and freeze-all study arms: 51/105 (48.6%) versus 57/104 (54.8%) and 41/104 (39.4%) versus 42/101 (41.6%), respectively (relative risk for clinical pregnancy 1.13, 95% CI 0.87–1.47; P = 0.41). However, moderate-to-severe OHSS occurred solely in the group that received low-dose hCG (9/105, 8.6%, 95% CI 3.2% to 13.9% vs 0/104, 95% CI 0 to 3.7, P &lt; 0.01). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The sample size calculation was based on a 19% absolute difference in terms of clinical pregnancy rates, therefore smaller differences, as observed in the trial, cannot be reliably excluded as non-significant. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This study offers the first comparative analysis of two common strategies applied to women performing IVF/ICSI with a high risk to develop OHSS. While pregnancy rates did not vary significantly, a fresh embryo transfer with intensified luteal phase support may still not avoid the risk of moderate-to-severe OHSS and serious consideration should be made before recommending it as a routine first-line treatment. Future trials may allow us to confirm these findings. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. No external funding was obtained for this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02148393. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 28 May 2014 DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT 30 May 2014

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document