Nurse Practitioners and the Intensive Care Unit

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-265
Author(s):  
W. J. Robertson

It is common knowledge that Level III neonatal intensive care units are almost always short staffed so far as trained neonatologists are concerned and that the Level II centers, especially if they are in geographically remote locations, often do not have a fully trained neonatologist on staff.1,2 Although the training in neonatology of the newly graduated pediatricians is gradually improving, it is probably fair to say that the delivery of modern, high-quality neonatal intensive care is beyond the capability of the average pediatrician graduated prior to 1970 and certainly if graduated prior to 1960.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (02) ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen McCord ◽  
Elise Fieldhouse ◽  
Walid El-Naggar

Objective This article assesses the degree of variability in the current practice of skin antiseptics used in Canadian neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and different experiences related to each antiseptic used. Methods An anonymous survey was distributed to a clinical representative of each of the 124 Canadian level II and level III NICUs. Results One hundred and two respondents (82.2%), representing all Canadian provinces, completed the survey. Chlorhexidine gluconate with/without alcohol was the antiseptic most used (96%) and the antiseptic with the highest reported adverse effects (68% reported skin burns/breakdown). Other antiseptics used include povidone-iodine (35%) and isopropyl alcohol (22%). Specific guidelines for antiseptic use were available in only 50% of the units with many NICUs lacking gestational and/or chronological age restrictions. Only 23% of responders believed that there was awareness among health care providers of the adverse effects of antiseptics used. Less than half (43%) were completely satisfied with the antiseptics used in their units. Conclusion Chlorhexidine gluconate is the most commonly used antiseptic in Canadian NICUs. The high number of associated adverse effects and the lack of guidelines regulating antiseptic use are of concern. Large clinical trials are urgently needed to guide practice and improve the safety of antiseptics.


2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 162-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad T. Subhani ◽  
Ifrah Kanwal

In this article, we describe a digital photo scrapbooking project as a standard of care for the parents of infants admitted in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Photographs were taken from birth until discharge or expiry at special moments during the infant’s hospitalization and used to create a digital scrapbook with daily notes by the parents. The scrapbook and original photos were provided on a CD at discharge or at expiry. Parents and their families unanimously appreciated the photos and the opportunity to record their thoughts, and considered the CDs as a lifetime treasure. Digital photo journaling could be implemented as a standard of care at other institutions with a commitment from the nursing and ancillary staff of the NICU and labor and delivery department, with possible support from volunteers.


2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Villalba ◽  
JM Monteoliva ◽  
R Rodríguez ◽  
A Pattini

Neonatal intensive care units are a special lighting design challenge. Although natural light is highly desirable, it should be carefully planned to maximise benefits and minimise the problems associated with uncontrolled sunlight. This paper discusses the performance of different passive sunlight control strategies in a neonatal intensive care unit at the Dr. Humberto Notti Children's Hospital in Mendoza, Argentina, analysing their annual daylight behaviour through dynamic daylight simulations. The aim of this work is to optimise the use of daylight in neonatal intensive care units, considering the special lighting conditions required. Results show that, in this case study, the adequate implementation of solar control systems and the appropriate layout of the space for different uses according to surrounding building design and the characteristics of the local luminous climate can increase the useful daylight illuminance by up to 13%, while avoiding the incidence of direct sunlight at all times.


Ból ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 21-32
Author(s):  
Hanna Popowicz ◽  
Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska ◽  
Katarzyna Kwiecień-Jaguś

Healing pain as well as preventing it is an indisputable right of every human being. Activities connected with/ related to medical care in the neonatal intensive care unit may be the source of pain. The aim of the study was to characterize the problem of pain in terms of patients of neonatal intensive care units. The work describes not only the perception of neonatal pain but also preventing and therapeutic actions, including pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies. The last one can be used widely in the daily work of nursing/midwifery staff with neonatal intensive care unit (OITN) patients and their care providers. The study analyzed national and foreign literature on pain therapy in cases of patients of neonatal intensive care units. The available bibliographic databases include Medline, Scopus, PubMed and Google Scholar. The following keywords were used as search criteria: “pain”, “newborn baby”, “neonatal intensive care unit “‘nurse”, “midwives”.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia A. Mundy

Background Limited research has been conducted to assess family needs in neonatal intensive care units. Health care providers often make assumptions about what families need, but these assumptions are unfounded and can lead to inappropriate conclusions. When assessed appropriately, family needs can be incorporated into individualized plans of care, enhancing family-centered care. Objective To assess the needs of parents in neonatal intensive care units, we asked the following 3 questions: What are the most and least important needs of families in a level III neonatal intensive care unit? Do parents’ needs differ at admission and discharge? Do the needs of mothers and fathers differ? Methods Parents were interviewed by using the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Family Needs Inventory. Participants rated statements as not important (1), slightly important (2), important (3), very important (4), or not applicable (5). Results Fifty-two (93%) of the 56 items were rated as important or very important, and parents rated assurance-type needs highest. Parents at admission rated support needs higher than parents at discharge rated those needs. Needs of mothers and fathers did not differ significantly. Conclusions Identifying the needs of parents in neonatal intensive care units can enhance nursing communication and allow nurses to incorporate parents’ needs into families’ plans of care. The family needs inventory can help identify those needs and allows the integration of individualized nursing care to fulfill those needs, providing a positive family-centered experience in the unit for patients and their families.


2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (2) ◽  
pp. e1.20-e1
Author(s):  
Mulholland Peter

AimFollowing the amendment of the Misuse of Drugs Act in 2012,1 pharmacists have the same prescribing rights as medical prescribers. A survey in 20122 looked at how far this had been implemented in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) in the UK. This follow up survey looked at how much progress has been made in the past five years.MethodNeonatal and Paediatric Pharmacist Group (NPPG) members working in NICU were invited to complete an electronic survey to determine the extent of prescribing being undertaken and what, if any, barriers were encountered for this service development.Results40 responses were received, with the majority (23) working in Level 3 units. Just over half (56%) were prescribers, with 53% being independent prescribers. This compares with 47% and 40% in 2012. Of those not currently qualified only 8% had no plans to undertake the course (27% in 2012).The areas where pharmacists were prescribing were similar to 2012 with 70% prescribing in NICU or Special Care Baby Units (SCBU). As in 2012, 19% of those qualified were not prescribing.The majority of respondents were sole pharmacists on their units (54%), with 34% having two pharmacists and one unit had 4 pharmacists (all prescribers)Main medicines being prescribed were nutritional supplements (86%), Parenteral Nutrition (76%), antibiotics (76%), caffeine (67%) and reflux medication (62%). More pharmacists were prescribing controlled drugs (50%) and clinical trials medicines (12%), up from 5% and 2.5% respectively in 2012.Improvement in safety was seen as a benefit of pharmacist prescribing, with quicker access to medicines for patients. Freeing up medical staff time, allowing teams to focus on diagnosis and stabilising sick babies, was also seen as a benefit. Pharmacist prescribers can demonstrate good prescribing practices and set an example for other prescribers, particularly junior medical staff and trainee Advanced Neonatal Nurse Practitioners (ANNP)Pharmacists were generally seen as the most consistent presence on the unit and so are more aware of medication histories of patients, facilitating better discharge planning and communication with families regarding items such as unlicensed specials and prescribable feeds. Pharmacist’s knowledge of medicine formulations meant that they were more likely to consider if doses are measurable when prescribingIt was also felt that being a prescriber helped the pharmacist to integrate more into the multidisciplinary team.Few barriers were reported, with medical and nursing staff supporting the process. The main barriers were pharmacy related: funding being prioritised to adult services and the need for a second pharmacist to clinically check the prescribing were reported.ConclusionPharmacist prescribing has developed since the previous survey in 2012 with the process now embedded as routine practice in many units. Further support is required from pharmacy management to support this development.ReferencesThe Misuse of Drugs (Amendment No.2) (England, Wales and Scotland) Regulations2012 SI No 973.Mulholland P. Pharmacist prescribing in neonatal intensive care units in the UK. Arch Dis Child2013;98:e1. http://adc.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/98/6/e1-an?etoc


2018 ◽  
Vol 08 (04) ◽  
pp. e379-e383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grant Shafer ◽  
Gautham Suresh

AbstractDiagnostic errors remain understudied in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The few available studies are primarily autopsy-based, and do not evaluate diagnostic errors that did not result in the patient's death. This case series presents 10 examples of nonlethal diagnostic errors in the NICU—classified according to the component of the diagnostic process which led to the error. These cases demonstrate the presence of diagnostic error in the NICU and highlight the need for further research on this important topic.


Open Medicine ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-503
Author(s):  
Ilker Devrim ◽  
Ferah Genel ◽  
Füsun Atlihan ◽  
Erhan Özbek ◽  
Gamze Gülfidan

AbstractWe aimed to evaluate the risk factors for VRE colonization in neonatal intensive care units. In December 2007, we identified a neonate with VRE infection (urinary tract infection and we performed blood and stool cultures for VRE until the last colonized patient was discharged from our clinic. All the neonates hospitalized in NICU during December 2007 to January 2008. Active surveillance cultures for VRE fecal carriage was carried out in neonatal intensive care unit. Resistance to vancomycin was detected by the E-test method. Epidemiological data was recorded for all patients included in the study and was used for the risk factors. Totally 54 infants in NICU were screened for VRE colonization. Totally 11 infants (20%) were colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The average duration of all antimicrobial therapy was significantly longer in colonized patients. The infants who were hospitalized for more than 10 days were found to be significantly more colonized with VRE when compared to the infants with shorter hospital stay (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between VRE colonized and non-colonized infants in respect to sex, to third generation cephalosporin usage, glycopeptide usage, presence of prematurity, presence of mechanical ventilation(p> 0.05). The premature infants and the mature infants were under risk of VRE colonization. Longer duration of hospitalization and antimicrobial usage were the prominent risk factors. Since infants in neonatal intensive care units were under risk of infections, periodic active surveillance cultures should be combined with logical antimicrobial therapy.


2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 846-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pranita D. Tamma ◽  
Susan W. Aucott ◽  
Aaron M. Milstone

Infection prevention guidelines do not endorse Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) use in neonates who are less than 2 months old. A survey of US neonatology program directors revealed that most neonatal intensive care units use CHG, often with some restrictions. Prospective studies are needed to further address concerns regarding the safety of CHG in patients in the neonatal intensive care unit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document