scholarly journals Supporting Source Code Annotations with Metadata-Aware Development Environment

Author(s):  
Ján Juhár
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 9461-9464

Current quantum computer simulation strategies are inefficient in simulation and their realizations are also failed to minimize those impacts of the exponential complexity for simulated quantum computations. We proposed a Quantum computer simulator model in this paper which is a coordinated Development Environment – QuIDE (Quantum Integrated Development Environment) to support the improvement of algorithm for future quantum computers. The development environment provides the circuit diagram of graphical building and flexibility of source code. Analyze the complexity of algorithms shows the performance results of the simulator and used for simulation as well as result of its deployment during simulation


Author(s):  
N. V. Goryuk ◽  

The article investigates automation methods and means of integration of static source security analysis technology. The process of software security analysis, which is implemented by the technology of static analysis of the source code, is studied, and the methods of solving the problem of automation and integration of the technology into the source code development environment are offered. The perspective direction of further development of the technology of static analysis of the source code is established.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (24) ◽  
pp. 5264-5270
Author(s):  
Jennifer D Warrender ◽  
Anthony V Moorman ◽  
Phillip Lord

Abstract Summary The human karyotype has been used as a mechanism for describing and detecting gross abnormalities in the genome for many decades. It is used both for routine diagnostic purposes and for research to further our understanding of the causes of disease. Despite these important applications there has been no rigorous computational representation of the karyotype; rather an informal, string-based representation is used, making it hard to check, organize and search data of this form. In this article, we describe our use of OWL, the Ontology Web Language, to generate a fully computational representation of the karyotype; the development of this ontology represents a significant advance from the traditional bioinformatics use for tagging and navigation and has necessitated the development of a new ontology development environment called Tawny-OWL. Availability and implementation The Karyotype Ontology and associated Tawny-OWL source code is available on GitHub at https://github.com/jaydchan/tawny-karyotype, under a LGPL License, Version 3.0.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 657-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAULA-ANDRA BUSONIU ◽  
JOHANNES OETSCH ◽  
JÖRG PÜHRER ◽  
PETER SKOČOVSKÝ ◽  
HANS TOMPITS

AbstractIn this paper, we present SeaLion, an integrated development environment (IDE) for answer-set programming (ASP).SeaLionprovides source-code editors for the languages ofGringoandDLVand offers popular amenities like syntax highlighting, syntax checking, code completion, visual program outline, and refactoring functionality. The tool has been realised in the context of a research project whose goal is the development of techniques to support the practical coding process of answer-set programs. In this respect,SeaLionis the first IDE for ASP that provides debugging features that work for real-world answer-set programs and supports the rich languages of modern answer-set solvers. Indeed,SeaLionimplements a stepping-based debugging approach that allows the developer to quickly track down programming errors by simply following his or her intuitions on the intended semantics. Besides that,SeaLionsupports ASP development using model-driven engineering techniques including domain modelling with extended UML class diagrams and visualisation of answer sets in corresponding instance diagrams. Moreover, customised visualisation as well as visual editing of answer sets is realised by the Kara plugin ofSeaLion. Further implemented features are a documentation generator based on the Lana annotation language, support for external solvers, and interoperability with external tools.SeaLioncomes as a plugin of the popular Eclipse platform and provides interfaces for future extensions of the IDE.


2013 ◽  
Vol 07 (03) ◽  
pp. 215-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANDREW CRAPO ◽  
ABHA MOITRA

The Semantic Application Design Language (SADL) combines advances in standardized declarative modeling languages based on formal logic with advances in domain-specific language (DSL) development environments to create a controlled-English language that translates directly into the Web Ontology Language (OWL), the SPARQL graph query language, and a compatible if/then rule language. Models in the SADL language can be authored, tested, and maintained in an Eclipse-based integrated development environment (IDE). This environment offers semantic highlighting, statement completion, expression templates, hyperlinking of concepts to their definition, model validation, automatic error correction, and other advanced authoring features to enhance the ease and productivity of the modeling environment. In addition, the SADL language offers the ability to build in validation tests and test suites that can be used for regression testing. Through common Eclipse functionality, the models can be easily placed under source code control, versioned, and managed throughout the life of the model. Differences between versions can be compared side-by-side. Finally, the SADL-IDE offers an explanation capability that is useful in understanding what was inferred by the reasoner/rule engine and why those conclusions were reached. Perhaps more importantly, explanation is available of why an expected inference failed to occur. The objective of the language and the IDE is to enable domain experts to play a more active and productive role in capturing their knowledge and making it available as computable artifacts useful for automation where appropriate and for decision support systems in applications that benefit from a collaborative human-computer approach. SADL is built entirely on open source code and most of SADL is itself released to open source. This paper explores the concepts behind the language and provides details and examples of the authoring and model lifecycle support facilities.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Budiman

During this period continued to develop computer software, programming language was no exception. At the start of the era of low level programming languages, then developed a high level programming language. It is characterized by the appearance of a method of programming offered by a programming language, that is, object-oriented programming (OOP). IDE (Integrated Development Environment) is a computer program that has some facilities that are required in the development of the software. The purpose of the IDEA is to provide all the necessary utilities in building software. As for the type of software text editor that can be used to manipulate the source code hereinafter referred to as the source code of programming languages such as Ultraedit, JediEdit, ClearEdit, cEdit, the Golden Pen, and so on. PuniEdit software is a text-based editor software that can simplify the user through correction, insertion, and modification of the source code. PuniEdit software is built using Borland Delphi 7.0 and SynEdit component. This software can be used for the Pascal programming language, C++ and HTML. In addition, the software PuniEdit can perform management of the token. This PuniEdit software, the user can clearly see every occurrence of the type of token as keywords (reserved word), identifier, operator, and so on.Keywords: Source code, programming language, source code is scanned.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rashindra Manniesing

MevisLab [2] is a development environment for medical image processing and visualization, which supports the reading and writing of combined dicom/tiff images. In this document we provide the source code (ImageIO factory) for the Insight Toolkit (ITK) framework [4]. This image IO plugin supports 2D, 3D and 4D scalar images.Note: this class depends on version GDCM 2.0 and above.


2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Christakis

AbstractOur work on narrowing the gap between verification and systematic testing has two directions: (1) complementing verification with systematic testing, and (2) pushing systematic testing toward reaching verification. In the first direction, we explore how to effectively combine static analysis with systematic testing, so as to guide test generation toward properties that have not been previously checked by a static analyzer in a sound way. This combination significantly reduces the test effort while checking more unverified properties. In the second direction, we push systematic testing toward checking as many executions as possible of a real and complex image parser, so as to prove the absence of a certain class of errors. This verification attempt required no static analysis or source code annotations; our purely dynamic techniques targeted the verification of the parser implementation, including complicated assembly patterns that most static analyses cannot handle.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document