scholarly journals A cone-beam komputertomográfia alkalmazása a fül-orr-gégészeti képalkotásban

2016 ◽  
Vol 157 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ádám Perényi ◽  
Zsolt Bella ◽  
Zoltán Baráth ◽  
Péter Magyar ◽  
Katalin Nagy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Multislice Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Imaging Studies ◽  
Effective Radiation Dose ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Resolution Imaging ◽  
Effective Radiation

Accurate diagnosis and preoperative planning in modern otorhinolaryngology is strongly supported by imaging with enhanced visualization. Computed tomography is often used to examine structures within bone frameworks. Given the hazards of ionizing radiation, repetitive imaging studies exponentially increase the risk of damages to radiosensitive tissues. The authors compare multislice and cone-beam computed tomography and determine the role, advantages and disadvantages of cone-beam computed tomography in otorhinolaryngological imaging. They summarize the knowledge from the international literature and their individual imaging studies. They conclude that cone-beam computed tomography enables high-resolution imaging and reconstruction in any optional plane and in space with considerably lower effective radiation dose. Cone-beam computed tomography with appropriate indications proved to be an excellent diagnostic tool in otorhinolaryngological imaging. It makes an alternative to multislice computed tomography and it is an effective tool in perioperative and postoperative follow-up, especially in those cases which necessitate repetitive imaging with computed tomography. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(2), 52–58.

scholarly journals Cone beam computed tomography in endodontics

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conor Durack ◽  
Shanon Patel
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Imaging System ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Conventional Radiography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Facial Skeleton ◽  
Effective Radiation Dose ◽  
Potential Applications ◽  
Effective Radiation

Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a contemporary, radiological imaging system designed specifically for use on the maxillo-facial skeleton. The system overcomes many of the limitations of conventional radiography by producing undistorted, three-dimensional images of the area under examination. These properties make this form of imaging particularly suitable for use in endodontics. The clinician can obtain an enhanced appreciation of the anatomy being assessed, leading to an improvement in the detection of endodontic disease and resulting in more effective treatment planning. In addition, CBCT operates with a significantly lower effective radiation dose when compared with conventional computed tomography (CT). The purpose of this paper is to review the current literature relating to the limitations and potential applications of CBCT in endodontic practice.

scholarly journals CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY: A REVIEW OF CURRENT LITERATURE

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 5-10
Author(s):  
В. Фанакин ◽  
V. Fanakin ◽  
И. Бутюгин ◽  
I. Butyugin ◽  
Е. Батанова ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Current Literature ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Biological Effects ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Pediatric Dentistry ◽  
Paediatric Dentistry ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Effective Radiation Dose ◽  
Effective Radiation

<p>The use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in paediatric dentistry has been mentioned in numerous publications and case reports. The indications for the use of CBCT in paediatric dentistry, however, have not yet been properly addressed. On the other hand, the three basic principles of radiation protection (justification, limitation and optimisation) should suffice. A review of the current literature was used to assess the indications and contra-indications for the use of CBCT in paediatric dentistry. Paramount is the fact that CBCT generates a higher effective dose to the tissues than traditional dental radiographic exposures do. The effective radiation dose should not be underestimated, especially not in children, who are much more susceptible to stochastic biological effects. The thyroid gland in particular should be kept out of the primary beam as much as possible. As with any other radiographical technique, routine use of CBCT is not acceptable clinical practice. CBCT certainly has a place in paediatric dentistry, but its use must be justified on a patient case individual basis. </p>

scholarly journals Cone beam computed tomography for the diagnosis of external root resorption associated with orthodontic treatment: A review.

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e037
Author(s):  
Mariela Burgos-Urey ◽  
Jhoana Mercedes Llaguno-Rubio
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Root Resorption ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
External Root Resorption ◽  
Management Protocol

External root resorption (ERR) is a highly prevalent, multifactorial problem frequently associated with orthodontic treatment. Treatment is complex due to the lack of solid knowledge regarding predisposing factors, systematic management for diagnosis and follow-up protocols or thefundamental theoretical bases of adequate imaging tools for each situation. This review describes the indications of the use of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and the factors related to its development and the characteristics of the techniques used in the diagnosisand monitoring of ERR in orthodontics. We compared the advantages and disadvantages of CBCT based on the risk/benefits. Methods: We have reviewed and summarized the information and the risk factors available on ERR in orthodontics and the use of CBCT in the diagnosis and follow-up of ERR with the aim of developing a management protocol. Likewise, CBCT is compared with other imaging techniques frequently used in ERR. The articles reviewed in this study coincide in terms of the advantages of precision of CBCT in the detection and linear and volumetric measurement of ERR associated with orthodontics over two-dimensional techniques. However, CBCT cannot completely replace other imaging techniques since its effectiveness is not significantly greater in cases with moderate ERR compromise. The use of CBCT should be optimized following specific criteria for its application. 

Estimating the Effective Radiation Dose Imparted to Patients by Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Thoracolumbar Spinal Surgery

Spine ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. E306-E312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Lange ◽  
Andrew Karellas ◽  
John Street ◽  
Jason C. Eck ◽  
Anthony Lapinsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Radiation Dose ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Spinal Surgery ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Effective Radiation Dose ◽  
Effective Radiation

scholarly journals Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography for detecting residual stones in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a feasibility study

Urolithiasis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Kingma ◽  
M. J. H. Voskamp ◽  
B. H. J. Doornweerd ◽  
I. J. de Jong ◽  
S. Roemeling
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Residual Stones ◽  
Residual Fragments

AbstractCone beam computed tomography (CBCT) provides multiplanar cross-sectional imaging and three-dimensional reconstructions and can be used intraoperatively in a hybrid operating room. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of using a CBCT-scanner for detecting residual stones during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Intraoperative CBCT-scans were made during PCNL procedures from November 2018 until March 2019 in a university hospital. At the point where the urologist would have otherwise ended the procedure, a CBCT-scan was made to image any residual fragments that could not be detected by either nephroscopy or conventional C-arm fluoroscopy. Residual fragments that were visualized on the CBCT-scan were attempted to be extracted additionally. To evaluate the effect of this additional extraction, each CBCT-scan was compared with a regular follow-up CT-scan that was made 4 weeks postoperatively. A total of 19 procedures were analyzed in this study. The mean duration of performing the CBCT-scan, including preparation and interpretation, was 8 min. Additional stone extraction, if applicable, had a mean duration of 11 min. The mean effective dose per CBCT-scan was 7.25 mSv. Additional extraction of residual fragments as imaged on the CBCT-scan occurred in nine procedures (47%). Of the follow-up CT-scans, 63% showed a stone-free status as compared to 47% of the intraoperative CBCT-scans. We conclude that the use of CBCT for the detection of residual stones in PCNL is meaningful, safe, and feasible.

Use of cone beam computed tomography in the diagnosis, planning and follow up of a type III dens invaginatus case

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 198-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. V. Vier-Pelisser ◽  
A. Pelisser ◽  
L. C. Recuero ◽  
M. V. R. Só ◽  
M. G. Borba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Dens Invaginatus

Invasive Cervical Resorption Class III in a Maxillary Central Incisor: Diagnosis and Follow-up by Means of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

2010 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 2012-2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto Estevez ◽  
Jose Aranguren ◽  
Alfonso Escorial ◽  
Cesar de Gregorio ◽  
Francisco De La Torre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Central Incisor ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Maxillary Central Incisor

scholarly journals Cone beam computed tomography for detecting residual stones in percutaneous nephrolithotomy, a randomized controlled trial (CAPTURE) protocol

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Kingma ◽  
I. J. de Jong ◽  
M. J. W. Greuter ◽  
S. Roemeling
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Total Study Population ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Free Status

Abstract Introduction Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard surgical treatment method for large kidney stones. Its aim is to achieve a stone-free status, since any residual fragments (RFs) after PCNL are likely to cause additional morbidity or stone growth. Enhancing intraoperative detectability of RFs could lead to increased stone-free rates and decreased re-intervention rates. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has recently been introduced in urology as a feasible method for intraoperatively imaging RFs. The aim of this trial is to determine the added value of CBCT in percutaneous nephrolithotomy, by measuring differences in stone-related morbidity for patients with procedures in which a CBCT is used versus patients with procedures without the use of CBCT. Methods The CAPTURE trial is an investigator-initiated single-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT) in adult patients who have an indication for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. A contemporary percutaneous nephrolithotomy is performed. Once the surgeon is convinced of a stone-free status by means of fluoroscopy and nephroscopy, randomization allocates patients to either the study group in whom an intraoperative CBCT scan is performed or to the control group in whom no intraoperative CBCT scan is performed. The main endpoint is the stone-free status as assessed four weeks postoperatively by low-dose non-contrast abdominal CT, as a standard follow-up procedure. Secondary endpoints include the number of PCNL procedures required and the number of stone-related events (SREs) registered. The total study population will consist of 320 patients that undergo PCNL and are eligible for randomization for an intraoperative CBCT scan. Discussion We deem a randomized controlled trial to be the most effective and reliable method to assess the efficacy of CBCT in PCNL. Though some bias may occur due to the impossibility of blinding the urologist at randomization, we estimate that the pragmatic nature of the study, standardized circumstances, and follow-up methods with pre-defined outcome measures will result in a high level of evidence. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register (NTR) NL8168, ABR NL70728.042.19. Registered on 15 October 2019. Prospectively registered.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document