Comments on “Hardness, elasticity, and fracture toughness of polycrystalline spinel germanium nitride and tin nitride,” by M.P. Shemkunas, W.T. Petuskey, A.V.G. Chizmeshya, K. Leinenweber, and G.H. Wolf [J. Mater. Res. 19, 1392 (2004)]: Reestablishing of elastic moduli for γ-Ge3N4

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 3273-3274
Author(s):  
Andreas Zerr

It will be shown that in the considered paper, a mistake occurred by handling or editing of experimental data for one of two investigated materials, namely, for cubic germanium nitride having spinel structure (γ-Ge3N4). This mistake led to incorrect values of the shear modulus G0, Young’s modulus E0, and Poisson’s ratio ν0 of this compound. My effort to recover the elastic moduli of γ-Ge3N4 from the available data gave the following results: G0 = 124 GPa, E0 = 326 GPa, and ν0 = 0.32.

2010 ◽  
Vol 160-162 ◽  
pp. 1691-1698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Xin Huang ◽  
Cai Fu Qian ◽  
Peng Liu ◽  
Xu Liang Deng ◽  
Qing Cai ◽  
...  

This study aimed at investigating the effects of the post material properties on the maximum stress in the root and maximum deformation of the restorative system. Effects of material properties of fiber post on the maximum equivalent stress in the root and the maximum deformation of the restorative system were numerically investigated. Results show that the maximum equivalent stress in the root can be decreased by 8.3% and the maximum deformation of the restorative system decreased by 10% compared with corresponding maximum values if changing Young’s modulus, Shear modulus and Poisson’s ratio in the range studied here. The maximum equivalent stress in the root is more sensitive to Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio while the deformation of the restorative system is more seriously affected by the Shear modulus of the post material.


2010 ◽  
Vol 504 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Schmidt ◽  
Jennifer E. Ni ◽  
Eldon D. Case ◽  
Jeffery S. Sakamoto ◽  
Daniel C. Kleinow ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Khalid I. Alzebdeh

The mechanical behaviour of a single-layer nanostructured graphene sheet is investigated using an atomistic-based continuum model. This is achieved by equating the stored energy in a representative unit cell for a graphene sheet at atomistic scale to the strain energy of an equivalent continuum medium under prescribed boundary conditions. Proper displacement-controlled (essential) boundary conditions which generate a uniform strain field in the unit cell model are applied to calculate one elastic modulus at a time. Three atomistic finite element models are adopted with an assumption that force interactions among carbon atoms can be modeled by either spring-like or beam elements. Thus, elastic moduli for graphene structure are determined based on the proposed modeling approach. Then, effective Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio are extracted from the set of calculated elastic moduli. Results of Young’s modulus obtained by employing the different atomistic models show a good agreement with the published theoretical and numerical predictions. However, Poisson’s ratio exhibits sensitivity to the considered atomistic model. This observation is supported by a significant variation in estimates as can be found in the literature. Furthermore, isotropic behaviour of in-plane graphene sheets was validated based on current modeling.


1967 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-97
Author(s):  
J. R. Asay

The longitudinal and shear wave velocities in a polycrystalline sample of magnesium thorium alloy were measured by a pulse transmission technique as a function of temperature. Temperatures ranged from 25 C to about 350 deg C for longitudinal wave measurements and to about 220 deg C for shear measurements. The resulting velocity data were used to calculate various elastic properties of the material, including Young’s modulus, shear modulus, bulk modulus, and Poisson’s ratio. The resulting least squares fits for these data are: Longitudinal velocity, cl = 5.749 − 3.987 × 10−4T − 1.139 × 10−6T2mm/μsec; shear velocity, ct = 3.108 − 1.421 × 10−4T − 2.588 × 10−6T2mm/μsec; bulk modulus, B = 3.576 × 10″ − 2.744 × 107T + 1.187 × 105T2 dynes/cm2; Young’s modulus, E = 4.435 × 10″ − 1.415 × 107T = 6.037 × 105T2 dynes/cm2; shear modulus, G = 1.716 × 10″ − 7.994 × 106T − 2.619 × 105T2 dynes/cm2; Poisson’s ratio, σ = 0.293 − 6.459 × 10−6T + 3.392 × 10−7T2.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document