scholarly journals Investigation of corrosion resistance welds metal hose made of steels AISI 304 and AISI 316

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (5(76)) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Наталя Аркадіївна Солідор ◽  
Віталій Петрович Іванов ◽  
Федiр Вiкторович Моргай ◽  
Борис Іванович Носовський
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. V. Durga Rajesh ◽  
Tanya Buddi ◽  
P. Rahul Kanth ◽  
Kosaraju Satyanarayana

2013 ◽  
Vol 794 ◽  
pp. 714-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Srikanth ◽  
P. Saravanan ◽  
P. Govindarajan ◽  
S. Sisodia ◽  
K. Ravi

Low-Ni and Ni-free varieties of duplex stainless steels (DSSs) have been successfully developed for the first time on laboratory scale in SAIL. The alloy compositions for Ni-free and low-Ni (<1.5 wt%) DSSs were evolved through formulation of appropriate chromium and nickel equivalents to achieve an optimum phase balance of 55 vol% austenite and 45 vol% ferrite in stainless steel microstructures. Laboratory heats were made achieving target chemistries and cast into 100 mm square cross-sectioned ingots. The ingots were subsequently soaked at 1150 °C for 3 hrs for thermal/ compositional homogenization and hot rolled in number of passes to 6 and 16 mm strips in Hillé experimental rolling mill with finish rolling temperatures of 950-980 °C. The hot rolled strips were eventually conferred solution annealing treatment by soaking them at 1060 °C for 2 hours followed by rapid quenching in water to prevent precipitation of deleterious intermetallic compounds (IMCs) and secondary phases. The new steels revealed an exceptional combination of properties: higher yield strength (488 MPa for low-Ni DSS and 501 MPa for Ni-free DSS), higher tensile strength (664 MPa for low-Ni DSS and 677 MPa for Ni-free DSS) and superior Charpy V-notch impact toughness (230 and 129 Joules at room temperature and -20°C, respectively, for low-Ni DSS as against 80 and 52 Joules at similar temperatures for Ni-free DSS). The yield strength of the steels was assessed to be about 1.6-1.8 times that of conventional austenitic grades AISI 304 L and AISI 316 L in annealed condition. The low-Ni and Ni-free DSS showed remarkable corrosion resistance and have been found to exhibit passivity, corrosion rates as low as 0.08-0.11 mpy, pitting potentials in the range of 482-596 mV and charge transfer resistances of the order of 106 W.cm2 in highly corrosive environment of 3.5% NaCl. The steels have been thus found to be superior in pitting/ localized corrosion resistance to AISI 304 L with pitting potential of 437 mV and comparable in performance with AISI 316 L with its high pitting potential of 602 mV. Even in the strongly reducing environment of 0.1 N H2SO4, the new steels have revealed tendency to passive film formation, breakdown potentials of 1127-1153 mV and passive film impedances of 104 W.cm2, comparable to the standard austenitic grades AISI 304 L and AISI 316 L. In boiling MgCl2 solutions, the low Ni DSS has been found to resist stress corrosion cracking (SCC) up to 24 h; the time for crack initiation being intermediate to that for AISI 304 L (3 h) and AISI 316 L (32 h). The Ni-free DSS, on the other hand, was found to exhibit no signs of SCC failure even after 72 h of exposure to the test solution. The degree of sensitization (DoS) for both low Ni and Ni-free DSSs has been quantified to be £ 0.05 in 0.5 M H2SO4 + 0.01 M KSCN, which has revealed their insusceptibility to intergranular corrosion (IGC). The steels have been found to be free from deleterious intermetallic phases such as sigma (s), chi (c), etc. and this has been ascertained from corrosion rates of <10 mdd in ferric chloride corrosion testing as per ASTM A 923 Method C.


1991 ◽  
Vol 79 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 37-49
Author(s):  
D. Desjardins ◽  
M. Puiggali ◽  
A. El Kheloui ◽  
M.C. Petit ◽  
C. Clément ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aisi 304 ◽  

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. A. Habib ◽  
M. S. Damra ◽  
J. J. Saura ◽  
I. Cervera ◽  
J. Bellés

The failure of the protective oxide scales of AISI 304 and AISI 316 stainless steels has been studied and compared at 1,000°C in synthetic air. First, the isothermal thermogravimetric curves of both stainless steels were plotted to determine the time needed to reach the breakdown point. The different resistance of each stainless steel was interpreted on the basis of the nature of the crystalline phases formed, the morphology, and the surface structure as well as the cross-section structure of the oxidation products. The weight gain of AISI 304 stainless steel was about 8 times greater than that of AISI 316 stainless steel, and AISI 316 stainless steel reached the breakdown point about 40 times more slowly than AISI 304 stainless steel. In both stainless steels, reaching the breakdown point meant the loss of the protective oxide scale of Cr2O3, but whereas in AISI 304 stainless steel the Cr2O3scale totally disappeared and exclusively Fe2O3was formed, in AISI 316 stainless steel some Cr2O3persisted and Fe3O4was mainly formed, which means that AISI 316 stainless steel is more resistant to oxidation after the breakdown.


DYNA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 82 (189) ◽  
pp. 22-29
Author(s):  
Jose Luddey Marulanda-Arevalo ◽  
Saul Castañeda-Quintana ◽  
Francisco Javier Perez-Trujillo

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 1897-1906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Cisquini ◽  
Simão Vervloet Ramos ◽  
Pedro Rupf Pereira Viana ◽  
Vanessa de Freitas Cunha Lins ◽  
Adonias Ribeiro Franco ◽  
...  

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 581
Author(s):  
Ioan Milosan ◽  
Monica Florescu ◽  
Daniel Cristea ◽  
Ionelia Voiculescu ◽  
Mihai Alin Pop ◽  
...  

The appropriate selection of implant materials is very important for the long-term success of the implants. A modified composition of AISI 316 stainless steel was treated using solar energy in a vertical axis solar furnace and it was subjected to a hyper-hardening treatment at a 1050 °C austenitizing temperature with a rapid cooling in cold water followed by three variants of tempering (150, 250, and 350 °C). After the heat treatment, the samples were analyzed in terms of hardness, microstructure (performed by scanning electron microscopy), and corrosion resistance. The electrochemical measurements were performed by potentiodynamic and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy in liquids that simulate biological fluids (NaCl 0.9% and Ringer’s solution). Different corrosion behaviors according to the heat treatment type have been observed and a passivation layer has formed on some of the heat-treated samples. The samples, heat-treated by immersion quenching, exhibit a significantly improved pitting corrosion resistance. The subsequent heat treatments, like tempering at 350 °C after quenching, also promote low corrosion rates. The heat treatments performed using solar energy applied on stainless steel can lead to good corrosion behavior and can be recommended as unconventional thermal processing of biocompatible materials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document