scholarly journals Performance of SEACLID/CORDEX-SEA multi-model experiments in simulating temperature and rainfall in Vietnam

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 374-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Thi Tuyet ◽  
Ngo Duc Thanh ◽  
Phan Van Tan
Keyword(s):  
Southeast Asia ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Red River ◽  
Observation Data ◽  
Red River Delta ◽  
North Central ◽  
Climate Downscaling

The study examined the performance of six regional climate experiments conducted under the framework of the Southeast Asia Regional Climate Downscaling/Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment-Southeast Asia (SEACLID/CORDEX-SEA) project and their ensemble product (ENS) in simulating temperature at 2 m (T2m) and rainfall (R) in seven climatic sub-regions of Vietnam. The six experiments were named following the names of their driving Global Climate Models (GCMs), i.e., CNRM, CSIRO, ECEA, GFDL, HADG and MPI. The observation data for the period 1986–2005 from 66 stations in Vietnam were used to compare with the model outputs. Results showed that cold biases were prominent among the experiments and ENS well reproduced the seasonal cycle of temperature in the Northeast, Red River Delta, North Central and Central Highlands regions. For rainfall, all the experiments showed wet biases and CSIRO exhibited the best. A scoring system was elaborated to objectively rank the performance of the experiments and the ENS experiment was reported to be the best.

A Bayesian Hierarchical Model for Heterogeneous RCM–GCM Multimodel Ensembles*

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (15) ◽  
pp. 6249-6266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Kerkhoff ◽  
Hans R. Künsch ◽  
Christoph Schär
Keyword(s):  
Hierarchical Model ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Bayesian Hierarchical Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Seasonal Temperature ◽  
Bayesian Hierarchical ◽  
Multimodel Ensembles

Abstract A Bayesian hierarchical model for heterogeneous multimodel ensembles of global and regional climate models is presented. By applying the methodology herein to regional and seasonal temperature averages from the ENSEMBLES project, probabilistic projections of future climate are derived. Intermodel correlations that are particularly strong between regional climate models and their driving global climate models are explicitly accounted for. Instead of working with time slices, a data archive is investigated in a transient setting. This enables a coherent treatment of internal variability on multidecadal time scales. Results are presented for four European regions to highlight the feasibility of the approach. In particular, the methodology is able to objectively identify patterns of variability changes, in ways that previously required subjective expert knowledge. Furthermore, this study underlines that assumptions about bias changes have an effect on the projected warming. It is also shown that validating the out-of-sample predictive performance is possible on short-term prediction horizons and that the hierarchical model herein is competitive. Additionally, the findings indicate that instead of running a large suite of regional climate models all forced by the same driver, priority should be given to a rich diversity of global climate models that force a number of regional climate models in the experimental design of future multimodel ensembles.

The CORDEX‐Australasia ensemble: evaluation and future projections

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Evans ◽  
Giovanni Di Virgilio ◽  
Annette Hirsch ◽  
Peter Hoffmann ◽  
Armelle Reca Remedio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Model ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Climate Projections ◽  
Good Representation ◽  
Future Projections ◽  
Recent Climate ◽  
Climate Downscaling

<p>The World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) has an international initiative called the COordinated Regional climate Downscaling EXperiment (CORDEX). The goal of the initiative is to provide regionally downscaled climate projections for most land regions of the globe, as a compliment to the global climate model projections performed within the Coupled Model Intercomparison Projects (CMIP). CORDEX includes data from both dynamical and statistical downscaling. It is anticipated that the CORDEX dataset will provide a link to the impacts and adaptation community through its better resolution and regional focus. Participation in CORDEX is open and any researchers performing climate downscaling are encourage to engage with the initiative. Here I present the current status, <span>evaluation and future projections</span> for the CORDEX-AustralAsia <span>ensemble</span>.</p><p>The CORDEX-Australasia ensemble is the largest regional climate projection ensemble ever created for the region. It is a 20-member ensemble made by 6 regional climate models downscaling 11 global climate models. Overall the ensemble produces a good representation of recent climate. Consistent biases within the ensemble include an underestimation of the diurnal temperature range and an underestimation of precipitation across much of southern Australia. Under a high emissions scenario projected temperature changes by the end of the twenty-first century reach ~ 5 K in the interior of Australia with smaller increases found toward the coast. Projected precipitation changes are towards drying, particularly in the most populated areas of the southwest and southeast of the continent. The projected precipitation change is very seasonal with summer projected to see little change leaning toward an increase. These results provide a foundation enabling future studies of regional climate changes, climate change impacts, and adaptation options for Australia.</p>

scholarly journals Selecting global climate models for regional climate change studies

2009 ◽  
Vol 106 (21) ◽  
pp. 8441-8446 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. W. Pierce ◽  
T. P. Barnett ◽  
B. D. Santer ◽  
P. J. Gleckler
Keyword(s):  
Climate Change ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Change ◽  
Global Climate Models

scholarly journals Evaluation of CMIP5 Global Climate Models for Simulating Climatological Temperature and Precipitation for Southeast Asia

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suchada Kamworapan ◽  
Chinnawat Surussavadee
Keyword(s):  
Southeast Asia ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Total Error ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Ensemble Average ◽  
Temperature And Precipitation ◽  
Intercomparison Project

This study evaluates the performances of all forty different global climate models (GCMs) that participate in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) for simulating climatological temperature and precipitation for Southeast Asia. Historical simulations of climatological temperature and precipitation of the 40 GCMs for the 40-year period of 1960–1999 for both land and sea and those for the century of 1901–1999 for land are evaluated using observation and reanalysis datasets. Nineteen different performance metrics are employed. The results show that the performances of different GCMs vary greatly. CNRM-CM5-2 performs best among the 40 GCMs, where its total error is 3.25 times less than that of GCM performing worst. The performance of CNRM-CM5-2 is compared with those of the ensemble average of all 40 GCMs (40-GCM-Ensemble) and the ensemble average of the 6 best GCMs (6-GCM-Ensemble) for four categories, i.e., temperature only, precipitation only, land only, and sea only. While 40-GCM-Ensemble performs best for temperature, 6-GCM-Ensemble performs best for precipitation. 6-GCM-Ensemble performs best for temperature and precipitation simulations over sea, whereas CNRM-CM5-2 performs best over land. Overall results show that 6-GCM-Ensemble performs best and is followed by CNRM-CM5-2 and 40-GCM-Ensemble, respectively. The total errors of 6-GCM-Ensemble, CNRM-CM5-2, and 40-GCM-Ensemble are 11.84, 13.69, and 14.09, respectively. 6-GCM-Ensemble and CNRM-CM5-2 agree well with observations and can provide useful climate simulations for Southeast Asia. This suggests the use of 6-GCM-Ensemble and CNRM-CM5-2 for climate studies and projections for Southeast Asia.

scholarly journals Hydroclimatic Extremes in the Limpopo River Basin, South Africa, under Changing Climate

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3299
Author(s):  
Christina M. Botai ◽  
Joel O. Botai ◽  
Nosipho N. Zwane ◽  
Patrick Hayombe ◽  
Eric K. Wamiti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
River Basin ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Research Study ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Trend Test ◽  
Changing Climate

This research study evaluated the projected future climate and anticipated impacts on water-linked sectors on the transboundary Limpopo River Basin (LRB) with a focus on South Africa. Streamflow was simulated from two CORDEX-Africa regional climate models (RCMs) forced by the 5th phase of the Coupled Model Inter-Comparison Project (CMIP5) Global Climate Models (GCMs), namely, the CanESM2m and IPSL-CM5A-MR climate models. Three climate projection time intervals were considered spanning from 2006 to 2099 and delineated as follows: current climatology (2006–2035), near future (2036–2065) and end of century future projection (2070–2099). Statistical metrics derived from the projected streamflow were used to assess the impacts of the changing climate on water-linked sectors. These metrics included streamflow trends, low and high flow quantile probabilities, the Standardized Streamflow Index (SSI) trends and the proportion (%) of dry and wet years, as well as drought monitoring indicators. Based on the Mann-Kendall (MK) trend test, the LRB is projected to experience reduced streamflow in both the near and the distant future. The basin is projected to experience frequent dry and wet conditions that can translate to drought and flash floods, respectively. In particular, a high proportion of dry and a few incidences of wet years are expected in the basin in the future. In general, the findings of this research study will inform and enhance climate change adaptation and mitigation policy decisions and implementation thereof, to sustain the livelihoods of vulnerable communities.

Projected precipitation changes over China for global warming levels at 1.5°C and 2°C in an ensemble of regional climate simulations: Impact of bias-correction algorithms

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianyi Guo
Keyword(s):  
Global Warming ◽  
Bias Correction ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Dynamical Downscaling ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Cumulative Distribution ◽  
Mathematical Framework

<p>Four bias-correction methods, i.e. Gamma Cumulative Distribution Function (GamCDF), Quantile-Quantile Adjustment (QQadj), Equidistant CDF Matching (EDCDF) and Transform CDF (CDF-t), were applied to five daily precipitation datasets over China produced by LMDZ4-regional that was nested into five global climate models (GCMs), BCC-CSM1-1m, CNRM-CM5, FGOALS-g2, IPSL-CM5A-MR and MPI-ESM-MR, respectively. A unified mathematical framework can be used to define the four methods, which helps understanding their nature and essence in identifying the most reliable probability distributions of projected climate. CDF-t is shown to be the best bias-correction algorithm based on a comprehensive evaluation of different rainfall indices. Future precipitation projections corresponds to the global warming levels of 1.5°C and 2°C under RCP8.5 were obtained using the bias correction methods. The multi-algorithm and multi-model ensemble characteristics allow to explore the spreading of results, considered as a surrogate of climate projection uncertainty, and to attribute such uncertainties to different sources. It was found that the spread among bias-correction methods is smaller than that among dynamical downscaling simulations. The four bias-correction methods with CDF-t at the top all reduce the spread among the downscaled results. Future projection using CDF-t is thus considered having higher credibility.</p>

scholarly journals Stochastic Rainfall Downscaling of Climate Models

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 830-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. D’Onofrio ◽  
E. Palazzi ◽  
J. von Hardenberg ◽  
A. Provenzale ◽  
S. Calmanti
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Regional Climate Models ◽  
Amplitude Distribution ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Physically Based ◽  
Stochastic Downscaling

Abstract Precipitation extremes and small-scale variability are essential drivers in many climate change impact studies. However, the spatial resolution currently achieved by global climate models (GCMs) and regional climate models (RCMs) is still insufficient to correctly identify the fine structure of precipitation intensity fields. In the absence of a proper physically based representation, this scale gap can be at least temporarily bridged by adopting a stochastic rainfall downscaling technique. In this work, a precipitation downscaling chain is introduced where the global 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40) (at about 120-km resolution) is dynamically downscaled using the Protheus RCM at 30-km resolution. The RCM precipitation is then further downscaled using a stochastic downscaling technique, the Rainfall Filtered Autoregressive Model (RainFARM), which has been extended for application to long climate simulations. The application of the stochastic downscaling technique directly to the larger-scale reanalysis field at about 120-km resolution is also discussed. To assess the ability of this approach in reproducing the main statistical properties of precipitation, the downscaled model results are compared with the precipitation data provided by a dense network of 122 rain gauges in northwestern Italy, in the time period from 1958 to 2001. The high-resolution precipitation fields obtained by stochastically downscaling the RCM outputs reproduce well the seasonality and amplitude distribution of the observed precipitation during most of the year, including extreme events and variance. In addition, the RainFARM outputs compare more favorably to observations when the procedure is applied to the RCM output rather than to the global reanalyses, highlighting the added value of reaching high enough resolution with a dynamical model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document