scholarly journals Incorporating leadership development into family medicine residency: a qualitative study of program directors in Canada

MedEdPublish ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen Grady ◽  
Emily Johnston ◽  
Karen Schultz ◽  
Richard Birtwhistle
Keyword(s):  
Leadership Development ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Qualitative Study ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Family Medicine Residency

scholarly journals Impact of Proposed Institute of Medicine Duty Hours: Family Medicine Residency Directors' Perspective

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Carek ◽  
Joseph W. Gravel ◽  
Stanley Kozakowski ◽  
Perry A. Pugno ◽  
Gerald Fetter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Residency Program ◽  
Detrimental Effect ◽  
Resident Education ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Institute Of Medicine ◽  
Family Medicine Residency ◽  
Potential Impact ◽  
Residency Program Directors

Abstract Purpose To examine the opinions of family medicine residency program directors concerning the potential impact of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) resident duty hour recommendations on patient care and resident education. Methods A survey was mailed to 455 family medicine residency program directors. Data were summarized and analyzed using Epi Info statistical software. Significance was set at the P < .01 level. Results A total of 265 surveys were completed (60.9% response rate). A majority of family medicine residency program directors disagreed or strongly disagreed that the recent IOM duty hour recommendations will, in general, result in improved patient safety and resident education. Further, a majority of respondents disagreed or strongly disagreed that the proposed IOM rules would result in residents becoming more compassionate, more effective family physicians. Conclusion A majority of family medicine residency program directors believe that the proposed IOM duty hour recommendations would have a primarily detrimental effect on both patient care and resident education.

scholarly journals An Update of Oral Health Curricula in US Family Medicine Residency Programs

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 437-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh Silk ◽  
Judith A. Savageau ◽  
Kate Sullivan ◽  
Gail Sawosik ◽  
Min Wang
Keyword(s):  
Oral Health ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Health Curriculum ◽  
Family Medicine Residency ◽  
Important Health ◽  
Dental Professional ◽  
Residency Program Directors

Background and Objectives: National initiatives have encouraged oral health training for family physicians and other nondental providers for almost 2 decades. Our national survey assesses progress of family medicine residency programs on this important health topic since our last survey in 2011. Methods: Family medicine residency program directors (PDs) completed an online survey covering various themes including number of hours of oral health (OH) teaching, topics covered, barriers, evaluation, positive influences, and program demographics. Results: Compared to 2011, more PDs feel OH should be addressed by physicians (86% in 2017 vs 79% in 2011), yet fewer programs are teaching OH (81% vs 96%) with fewer hours overall (31% vs 45% with 4 or more hours). Satisfaction with the competence of graduating residents in OH significantly decreased (17% in 2017 vs 32% in 2011). Program directors who report graduates being well prepared to answer board questions on oral health topics are more likely to have an oral health champion (P<0.001) and report satisfaction with the graduates’ level of oral health competency (P<0.001). Programs with an oral health champion, or having a relationship with a state or national oral health coalition, or having routine teaching from a dental professional are significantly more likely to have more hours of oral health curriculum (P<0.001). Conclusions: Family medicine PDs are more aware of the importance of oral health, yet less oral health is being taught in residency programs. Developing more faculty oral health champions and connecting programs to dental faculty and coalitions may help reduce this educational void.

Leadership training in family medicine residency: a scoping review

BMJ Leader ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-245
Author(s):  
Stephanie Godard ◽  
Savithiri Ratnapalan
Keyword(s):  
Leadership Development ◽  
Family Medicine ◽  
Small Group ◽  
Leadership Training ◽  
Leadership Skills ◽  
Ongoing Research ◽  
Family Medicine Residency ◽  
Select Group ◽  
Integrated Leadership ◽  
Training Programmes

BackgroundGraduate medical education, including family medicine residency, has historically focused on building clinical competencies with little attention paid to leadership skills, leaving residents feeling ill-prepared for leadership roles after training.ObjectiveTo analyse the format, content and outcomes of leadership training programmes offered to family medicine residents.MethodsA MEDLINE (OvidSP) literature search from 1976 to October 2018 for articles on Family Medicine AND Residency AND Leadership Programs retrieved 184 articles. After reviewing inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 articles were chosen for full review and synthesis.ResultsThree articles described leadership training available to Family Medicine all residents while nine focused on a select group. Programme format and content varied, ranging from a 1-day programme on emotional intelligence to a 5-year integrated leadership track. The most comprehensive curricula were longitudinal and offered to a small group of residents. Inclusive programmes often taught leadership through the lens of a specific competency. Mixed teaching methods were valued including online learning, simulations, small group discussions, mentorship, reflection, placements and projects. Conceptual frameworks were inconsistently used and programme evaluation seldom addressed high-level or long-term outcomes.ConclusionsLeadership skills are important for all family physicians; however, there is limited literature on comprehensive leadership development during training. Existing curricula were described in this review and we suggest a longitudinal mixed-methods programme integrated throughout residency, covering basic comprehensive skills for all residents. However, evaluative data were limited, and a considerable gap remains in how to effectively approach leadership development in family medicine residency, warranting ongoing research.

Assessing Family Medicine Residency Programs’ Training on Human Trafficking: A National Survey of Program Directors

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Ranit Mishori ◽  
Katherine Stolarz ◽  
Anita Ravi ◽  
Valeriy R. Korostyshevskiy ◽  
Ronald Chambers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Human Trafficking ◽  
National Survey ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Family Medicine Residency

scholarly journals Training Family Medicine Residents to Perform Home Visits: A CERA Survey

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoko Sairenji ◽  
Stephen A. Wilson ◽  
Frank D'Amico ◽  
Lars E. Peterson
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Home Visit ◽  
Home Visits ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Family Medicine Residency ◽  
Resident Time ◽  
Faculty Time ◽  
Research Alliance ◽  
Residency Program Directors

ABSTRACT Background  Home visits have been shown to improve quality of care, save money, and improve outcomes. Primary care physicians are in an ideal position to provide these visits; of note, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education no longer requires home visits as a component of family medicine residency training. Objective  To investigate changes in home visit numbers and expectations, attitudes, and approaches to training among family medicine residency program directors. Methods  This research used the Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) national survey of family medicine program directors in 2015. Questions addressed home visit practices, teaching and evaluation methods, common types of patient and visit categories, and barriers. Results  There were 252 responses from 455 possible respondents, representing a response rate of 55%. At most programs, residents performed 2 to 5 home visits by graduation in both 2014 (69% of programs, 174 of 252) and 2015 (68%, 172 of 252). The vast majority (68%, 172 of 252) of program directors expect less than one-third of their graduates to provide home visits after graduation. Scheduling difficulties, lack of faculty time, and lack of resident time were the top 3 barriers to residents performing home visits. Conclusions  There appeared to be no decline in resident-performed home visits in family medicine residencies 1 year after they were no longer required. Family medicine program directors may recognize the value of home visits despite a lack of few formal curricula.

scholarly journals Point-of-Care Ultrasound in Family Medicine Residencies 5-Year Update: A CERA Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 505-511
Author(s):  
Jeffrey W. W. Hall ◽  
Harland Holman ◽  
Tyler W. Barreto ◽  
Paul Bornemann ◽  
Andrew Vaughan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Core Curriculum ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Family Medicine Residency ◽  
Survey Results ◽  
Research Alliance ◽  
Residency Program Directors

Background and Objectives: In 2014, family medicine residency programs began to integrate point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) into training, although very few had an established POCUS curriculum. This study aimed to evaluate the resources, barriers, and scope of POCUS training in family medicine residencies 5 years after its inception. Methods: Questions regarding current training and use of POCUS were included in the 2019 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) survey of family medicine residency program directors, and results compared to similar questions on the 2014 CERA survey. Results: POCUS is becoming a core component of family medicine training programs, with 53% of program directors reporting establishing or an established core curriculum. Only 11% of program directors have no current plans to add POCUS training to their program, compared to 41% in 2014. Despite this increase in training, the reported clinical use of POCUS remains uncommon. Only 27% of programs use six of the eight surveyed POCUS modalities more than once per year. The top three barriers to including POCUS in residency training in 2019 have not changed since 2014, and are (1) a lack of trained faculty, (2) limited access to equipment, and (3) discomfort with interpreting images without radiologist review. Conclusions: Training in POCUS has increased in family medicine residencies over the last 5 years, although practical use of this technology in the clinical setting may be lagging behind. Further research should explore how POCUS can improve outcomes and reduce costs in the primary care setting to better inform training for this technology.

scholarly journals Group Medical Visit Training in Family Medicine Residency:

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carmen Strickland ◽  
Joanne C. Sandberg ◽  
Stephen W. Davis ◽  
Sally P. Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Resident Training ◽  
Training Methods ◽  
Medical Visit ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Family Medicine Residency ◽  
Group Medical Visits ◽  
Medical Visits ◽  
The Status

Background and Objectives: Group medical visits (GMV) have been shown to improve clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction and are included as a new tool in the patient-centered medical home (PCMH). The capacity for and interest in developing GMV skills in family medicine residency have not been assessed. This study aims to describe the extent of existing training in GMV as well as attitudes toward and barriers to this training. Methods: The Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) sent a survey in the fall of 2015 to all US family medicine residency program directors (PDs) containing questions about the status of GMV training for their residents. Results: The survey response rate was 53%. Fifty-nine percent of program director respondents report access to GMV and 61% note some form of training in this model of care. Seventy-nine percent of respondents indicate that GMV training is important for residents. Multiple barriers exist to optimizing GMV as part of current family medicine training. Conclusions: A majority of family medicine PD respondents report both access to and curriculum for GMV. While program directors endorse this practice model as an important element in resident training, they acknowledge challenges that may limit its availability. Opportunities to better understand and overcome barriers may increase programs’ capacity to deliver GMV skills.

scholarly journals Perceptions of Parenting Residents Among Family Medicine Residency Directors

2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (10) ◽  
pp. 756-762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura E. Morris ◽  
Erik Lindbloom ◽  
Robin L. Kruse ◽  
Karla T. Washington ◽  
Nikole J. Cronk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Medicine ◽  
Residency Training ◽  
Parental Leave ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Cognitive Resources ◽  
Support Structures ◽  
Parenting Support ◽  
Family Medicine Residency ◽  
Gender Based

Background and Objectives: Parenting during residency is increasingly common, and resident parents face unique demands on their time and emotional and cognitive resources. Physicians at all levels of training perceive negative impacts of parenting on career and family life. Surveys of program directors (PDs) in other specialties reveal concern about performance and quality of life of parenting residents. The primary aims of this study were to examine family medicine PDs’ perceptions of parenting residents’ performance and the adequacy of parenting support structures. Methods: Data were collected from the 2017 Council of Academic Family Medicine (CAFM) Educational Research Alliance (CERA) Family Medicine Residency Program Directors survey. Directors provided the number and status of parenting residents and rated adequacy of parenting resources, resident performance, and impact of parenting on residents using a Likert scale. Results were compared between male/female PDs and male/female residents. Results: Response rate was 57.1%. Less than half of PDs reported adequate parenting support structures in their program (46%). Over 40% of PDs reported that 81%-100% of female residents who take parental leave end up extending their residency training, the most common response category. PDs did not report gender-based differences in performance of parenting residents. PDs most often reported significantly worse well-being for female parenting residents but perceived improved well-being of male parents. Conclusions: Less than half of family medicine PDs feel their program has adequate parenting resources. Female parenting residents commonly extend residency training. PDs perceive parenting negatively impacts well-being of female residents, but not male residents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document