Gape: Body Size Relationship of Flathead Catfish

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 198-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joe E. Slaughter ◽  
Brad Jacobson
1992 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 827-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
J B Young ◽  
R J Troisi ◽  
S T Weiss ◽  
D R Parker ◽  
D Sparrow ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley P. Smith ◽  
Teghan A. Lucas ◽  
Rachel M. Norris ◽  
Maciej Henneberg

Endocranial volume was measured in a large sample (n = 128) of free-ranging dingoes (Canis dingo) where body size was known. The brain/body size relationship in the dingoes was compared with populations of wild (Family Canidae) and domestic canids (Canis familiaris). Despite a great deal of variation among wild and domestic canids, the brain/body size of dingoes forms a tight cluster within the variation of domestic dogs. Like dogs, free-ranging dingoes have paedomorphic crania; however, dingoes have a larger brain and are more encephalised than most domestic breeds of dog. The dingo’s brain/body size relationship was similar to those of other mesopredators (medium-sized predators that typically prey on smaller animals), including the dhole (Cuon alpinus) and the coyote (Canis latrans). These findings have implications for the antiquity and classification of the dingo, as well as the impact of feralisation on brain size. At the same time, it highlights the difficulty in using brain/body size to distinguish wild and domestic canids.


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis J. Fielding ◽  
Linda S. DeFoliart

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (17) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsuguki Kinoshita ◽  
Etsushi Kato ◽  
Koki Iwao ◽  
Yoshiki Yamagata

Oecologia ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin D. Congdon ◽  
Roy D. Nagle ◽  
Chirstopher W. Beck ◽  
Owen M. Kinney ◽  
S. Rebecca Yeomans ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.M. Freeman ◽  
J.E. Rush ◽  
A. Feugier ◽  
I. van Hoek

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document