scholarly journals Queering the Curriculum

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Baines ◽  
Jane Edwards ◽  
Jennyfer Hatch ◽  
Judy Pereira

Music therapy academic faculty responsible for teaching the next generation of healthcare practitioners have a special responsibility to ensure that the learning environment is one in which the principles of equity and inclusion are upheld and practiced. When LGBTQ+ content is unavailable in the educational environment, it marks the presence of overt and covert hostility and microaggressions toward LGBTQ+ people and their identities. The classroom then exists as a heteronormative and cisnormative space that places the burden on students to discover, include and manage reference to LGBTQ+ identities and experiences.   Socially constructed roles which relied on limited conceptions of a normative binary that recognized only hetero and cis male and female identities is shifting; LGBTQ+ people are increasingly reflected in the media and our society, creating opportunities for deep thinking and expansion. Reviewing current teaching environments and methods allows consideration of the kinds of social constructions that limit our capacity as educators and music therapists to fully include LTBTQ+ people and content. In this paper, two LGBTQ+ relatively recent music therapy graduates and two hetero cis seasoned feminist music therapy educators use anti-oppressive practice theory to reflect on and reveal predominant heteronormative and cisnormative values in music therapy education and reflect on ways to make classroom and practicum settings a safe and exploring space for all students and their clients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-50
Author(s):  
Lauren DiMaio ◽  
Becky Engen

Abstract Ethical thinking in music therapy is a vital aspect of the profession. However, little is published on the subject of ethics in the music therapy academic setting. Therefore, this article explores the complex issues of ethics and ethical thinking in music therapy education from the perspective of two music therapists who have held various positions within academics in music therapy. The purpose of this article is to encourage integrity within music therapy education and to draw attention to the complex ethical issues within music therapy academics. Four points are described for music therapy educators: (1) Assess positions of power, (2) Explore your adaptability, (3) Assess possible infringement of rights, and (4) Consider cultural bias in your responses. These points are offered as recommendations inserted into the Dileo Model of Ethical Thinking for Music Therapists for people in academia when faced with ethical dilemmas.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-149
Author(s):  
Meganne K Masko ◽  
Kelly Thormodson ◽  
Kristen Borysewicz

Abstract Higher education traditionally focuses on didactic, or passive, teaching and learning techniques as these are efficient ways of conveying information to the students. However, passive learning places the responsibility for students’ learning on the instructor rather than the students themselves. Constructive learning techniques, such as case-based learning (CBL), give students opportunities to apply previous knowledge while constructing their own deep learning. The purpose of this article is to describe both the implementation and evaluation of a CBL unit in a junior-level undergraduate music therapy theories and methods course. The cohort study utilized student reflection papers, faculty observations, class materials, and a student survey to evaluate the impact of a behavioral health-focused CBL unit on information literacy, critical thinking skills, and student enjoyment of learning. Students answered both Likert-type and open-ended questions on these topics. Open-ended questions were analyzed using a directed qualitative content analysis. Students felt that the CBL unit was effective in increasing their information literacy and critical thinking skills, and they enjoyed the unit. According to survey results, the CBL developed several measured areas of student critical thinking skills, with the exception of the students’ abilities to analyze their own biases. The CBL unit appeared to be an effective and efficient way of simultaneously covering multiple learning outcomes and music therapy competencies. However, students did not perceive any changes in their ability to analyze their own biases which, based on previous psychology and sociology research, takes more than one isolated learning unit to address. Implications for music therapy education are addressed.


Author(s):  
James Hiller ◽  
Courtney Belt ◽  
Susan Gardstrom ◽  
Joy Willenbrink-Conte

Abstract The purpose of this paper is to put forth a model to support the psychological safety of undergraduate students as they engage in a form of experiential learning called self-experiences (SEs). SEs pair active engagement in learning episodes with learner self-inquiry. The need to safeguard curricular SEs is grounded in the American Music Therapy Association’s Professional Competencies and Code of Ethics and the Certification Board for Music Therapists’ Board Certification Domains. We first explicate several types and benefits of SEs and identify potential risks and contraindications that may compromise learners’ psychological safety and even cause harm. Next, we describe the steps we took in developing the model and gaining administrative approval. We outline major tenets and describe specific safeguarding practices at various levels of implementation. We offer a hypothetical vignette to contextualize the information, address certain challenges in implementing this model, and offer recommendations for future research related to undergraduate experiential learning. Educators, clinical trainers, and supervisors who employ SEs are encouraged to implement safeguards toward upholding professional ethics and supporting learners’ personal and professional development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document