scholarly journals Characterization of Secondary Electron Collection for Energy Recovery from High Energy Ions with a Magnetic Field

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (0) ◽  
pp. 3405025-3405025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shota HAGIHARA ◽  
Takayuki WADA ◽  
Satoshi NAKAMOTO ◽  
Hiromasa TAKENO ◽  
Yasuyoshi YASAKA ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (0) ◽  
pp. 2405029-2405029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayuki WADA ◽  
Shota KONNO ◽  
Satoshi NAKAMOTO ◽  
Hiromasa TAKENO ◽  
Yuichi FURUYAMA ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 373 ◽  
pp. 193-196
Author(s):  
Oksana Melikhova ◽  
Jakub Čížek ◽  
Ivan Procházka ◽  
Petr Hruška ◽  
Wolfgang Anwand ◽  
...  

Positron annihilation spectroscopy (PAS) was employed for characterization of defects in the hydrothermally (HT) grown zinc oxide single crystals irradiated by high energy ions. Defects created in ZnO crystals by 2.5 MeV protons, 7.5 MeV N3+ and 167 MeV Xe26+ ions were compared. The virgin ZnO crystals contain Zn-vacancies associated with hydrogen. Ion implantation introduced additional defects, namely Zn+O di-vacancies in crystals irradiated by protons and small vacancy clusters in samples implanted by N and Xe ions.


2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gohta Niimi ◽  
Yoshifumi Ueno ◽  
Kentaro Nishigori ◽  
Tatsuya Aota ◽  
Hidehiko Yashiro ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Joseph J. Comer ◽  
Charles Bergeron ◽  
Lester F. Lowe

Using a Van De Graaff Accelerator thinned specimens were subjected to bombardment by 3 MeV N+ ions to fluences ranging from 4x1013 to 2x1016 ions/cm2. They were then examined by transmission electron microscopy and reflection electron diffraction using a 100 KV electron beam.At the lowest fluence of 4x1013 ions/cm2 diffraction patterns of the specimens contained Kikuchi lines which appeared somewhat broader and more diffuse than those obtained on unirradiated material. No damage could be detected by transmission electron microscopy in unannealed specimens. However, Dauphiné twinning was particularly pronounced after heating to 665°C for one hour and cooling to room temperature. The twins, seen in Fig. 1, were often less than .25 μm in size, smaller than those formed in unirradiated material and present in greater number. The results are in agreement with earlier observations on the effect of electron beam damage on Dauphiné twinning.


Author(s):  
John C. Russ

Monte-Carlo programs are well recognized for their ability to model electron beam interactions with samples, and to incorporate boundary conditions such as compositional or surface variations which are difficult to handle analytically. This success has been especially powerful for modelling X-ray emission and the backscattering of high energy electrons. Secondary electron emission has proven to be somewhat more difficult, since the diffusion of the generated secondaries to the surface is strongly geometry dependent, and requires analytical calculations as well as material parameters. Modelling of secondary electron yield within a Monte-Carlo framework has been done using multiple scattering programs, but is not readily adapted to the moderately complex geometries associated with samples such as microelectronic devices, etc.This paper reports results using a different approach in which simplifying assumptions are made to permit direct and easy estimation of the secondary electron signal from samples of arbitrary complexity. The single-scattering program which performs the basic Monte-Carlo simulation (and is also used for backscattered electron and EBIC simulation) allows multiple regions to be defined within the sample, each with boundaries formed by a polygon of any number of sides. Each region may be given any elemental composition in atomic percent. In addition to the regions comprising the primary structure of the sample, a series of thin regions are defined along the surface(s) in which the total energy loss of the primary electrons is summed. This energy loss is assumed to be proportional to the generated secondary electron signal which would be emitted from the sample. The only adjustable variable is the thickness of the region, which plays the same role as the mean free path of the secondary electrons in an analytical calculation. This is treated as an empirical factor, similar in many respects to the λ and ε parameters in the Joy model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document