Evaluation of ethical aspects in health technology assessment: more methods than applications?

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjørn Hofmann ◽  
Kristin Bakke Lysdahl ◽  
Sigrid Droste
2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Dehnavieh ◽  
Somayeh Noori Hekmat ◽  
Sara Ghasemi ◽  
Nadia Mirshekari

Many countries in the world have tried to examine the possible methods for import and logical use of health technologies to manage their budgets on one hand and to prevent the entry of uncertain, inefficient, and insecure technologies on the other hand (1). The “health technology assessment” (HTA) is one of the dominant methods in most developed countries (2). HTA is a multidisciplinary field which studies the medical, social, and ethical aspects, as well as economic outcomes of production, diffusion, and application of health technologies (3).


Author(s):  
Henk ten Have

This study analyses why ethical aspects play a minor role in health technology assessment (HTA) studies, even when comprehensive approaches of technology assessment are advocated. Technology is often regarded as a value-neutral tool. At the same time, bioethics is dominated by an engineering model. Ethical contributions to evaluation of medical technology should go beyond issues of application in clinical practice and focus also on the definition of problems, the demarcation of technical and nontechnical issues, and the morally problematic implications of technologies.


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (S1) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
Karin Willbe Ramsay

IntroductionThe Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services (SBU) is commissioned to assess ethical aspects in their health technology assessment (HTA) reports, in addition to effects and health economic aspects of the examined interventions. For this purpose, a framework for systematic evaluation of ethical aspects of healthcare technologies has been developed and used at SBU since 2014. With seven years of practice, we decided it was time to evaluate experiences from using the ethical framework and consider possible adjustments to improve future use.MethodsSBU reports in the time period 2014–2020 were systematically screened for ethical content. Focus group meetings with users of the framework (mainly HTA project managers) were held where opinions regarding usability and possible obstacles were collected. A revised version of the document was sent for consultation to relevant stakeholders (possible users, reviewers and recipients) in order to collect additional views.ResultsOf fifty-eight HTA reports produced in the time frame, ethical aspects were evaluated in fifty-five reports (ninety-five percent), and in most cases, the framework had been used as support. In twenty-one cases (thirty-six percent), a professional ethicist had been engaged in the work. In twelve cases (twenty-one percent), ethical aspects were presented in the main conclusions of the report. Opinions from users and reviewers revealed that the framework was generally regarded as a helpful tool, but problems regarding interpretation of specific questions were highlighted and subjected to revision.ConclusionsThe ethical framework is a valuable tool for systematic and transparent identification and discussion of ethical aspects in the HTA context, and it has been well implemented at SBU. A systematic approach to assess ethical aspects can facilitate the communication and dissemination of ethical aspects as principal results from the HTA project.


2007 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario Sacchini ◽  
Pietro Refolo

I sistemi sanitari sono chiamati ad affrontare il problema della soddisfazione di crescenti bisogni assistenziali con una quantità di risorse limitata. Tale situazione implica la necessità di ottimizzare a tutti i livelli possibili l’uso delle risorse. In questo contesto, si è sviluppata a livello internazionale un’area di ricerca multidisciplinare, nota come Health Technology Assessment (HTA), atta a valutare, sotto diverse prospettive (clinica, economica, sociale, legale, etica, politica, psicologica, ecc.), l’impiego delle tecnologie in ambito sanitario. L’obiettivo principale è di supportare le decisioni di politica sanitaria. Simile area di ricerca ha assunto un ruolo sempre più importante all’interno di molte organizzazioni ospedaliere europee e nord-americane al punto da rappresentare attualmente il supporto forse più funzionale al management aziendale nelle decisioni che riguardano l’introduzione e l’impiego delle tecnologie sanitarie. Il contributo è volto a introdurre e argomentare il concetto di HTA, gli elementi, gli obiettivi, le problematicità e, soprattutto, gettare le basi di un’articolata riflessione sugli aspetti etici, i quali, sebbene scarsamente dibattuti in letteratura, rappresentano un elemento costitutivo della valutazione delle tecnologie sanitarie. ---------- Health care systems are called to face the problem of the satisfaction of the growing charitable need with a limited amount of resources. Such situation involves the necessity of optimizing the use of the resources on all the possible levels. In this context, a multidisciplinary research area has developed at international level, known as Health Technology Assessment (HTA), fitted to evaluate, under various perspectives (clinical, economic, social, legal, ethical, political, psychological, etc), the use of technologies in health care world. Its main purpose is to inform technology-related policy- making in health care. Similar research area has assumed an ever-growing importance in many European and North-American hospital organizations to such a degree that it represents at this moment the support probably more functional for the business management in decisions which regard the introduction and the use of medical technologies. The contribution wants to introduce and explore the concept of HTA, the elements, the objectives, the problematic natures and, above all, to lay the foundations of an articulate reflection on the ethical aspects, which, even though scantily discussed in literature, represent a constitutive element of the evaluation of medical technologies.


2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario Sacchini ◽  
Andrea Virdis ◽  
Pietro Refolo ◽  
Maddalena Pennacchini ◽  
Ignacio Carrasco de Paula

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 253-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabine Heel ◽  
Sonja Fischer ◽  
Stefan Fischer ◽  
Tobias Grässer ◽  
Ellen Hämmerling ◽  
...  

Zunächst führt dieser Artikel in die wesentlichen Begrifflichkeiten und Zielstellungen der Versorgungsforschung ein. Er befasst sich dann mit der Frage, wie die einzelnen Teildisziplinen der Versorgungsforschung, (1) die Bedarfsforschung, (2) die Inanspruchnahmeforschung, (3) die Organisationsforschung, (4) das Health Technology Assessment, (5) die Versorgungsökonomie, (6) die Qualitätsforschung und zuletzt (7) die Versorgungsepidemiologie konzeptionell zu fassen sind, und wie sie für neuropsychologische Anliegen ausformuliert werden müssen. In diesem Zusammenhang werden die in den einzelnen Bereichen jeweils vorliegenden versorgungsrelevanten Studienergebnisse referiert. Soweit es zulässig ist, werden Bedarfe für die Versorgungsforschung und Versorgungspraxis in der Neurorehabilitation daraus abgeleitet und Anregungen für die weitere empirische Forschung formuliert. Der Artikel bezieht sich – entsprechend seines Anliegens – ausschließlich auf Studien, die sich mit der Situation der deutschen Neurorehabilitation befassen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document