scholarly journals Bond Strength of Experimental Root Canal Sealers Based on MTA and Butyl Ethylene Glycol Disalicylate

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Carvalho Prado ◽  
Nancy Kudsi de Carvalho ◽  
Rafael Pino Vitti ◽  
Fabrício Aulo Ogliari ◽  
Luciana Moura Sassone ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ethylene Glycol ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Bonferroni Correction ◽  
Solution Ph ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Root Canal Sealers ◽  
Push Out ◽  
Alpha Type

Abstract This study investigated the bond strength of two experimental root canal sealers based on MTA and butyl ethylene glycol disalicylate: MTAe and MTAe-HA. The reference materials used for comparison were AH Plus and MTA Fillapex. Twenty human upper incisors were selected and one 1 mm slice was obtained from the cervical third of each root. On the coronal surface of each slice, four 0.9 mm wide holes were drilled through the dentine. Standardized irrigation was performed and holes were filled with one of the four tested sealers: AH Plus, MTA Fillapex, MTAe, and MTAe-HA. The filled slices were stored in a PBS solution (pH 7.2) for 7 days at 37 °C. A push-out assessment was performed with a 0.7 mm plunger tip. Load was applied at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min until sealer displacement. The results were expressed in MPa. The Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to assess the effect of each sealer on the push-out bond strength. Mann-Whitney with Bonferroni correction was used to isolate the differences. The alpha-type error was set at 0.05. Significant differences among medians values obtained by materials were observed (p<0.001). AH Plus displayed the highest value of bond strength (p<0.001). In contrast, MTA Fillapex presented the lowest bond strength among all tested sealers (p<0.001). Experimental sealers showed intermediary bond strength values, with no statistical differences between them (p>0.05). In conclusion, experimental root canal sealers presented suitable bond strength outcomes when compared to MTA Fillapex.

scholarly journals Effect of photo-activated disinfection on bond strength of three different root canal sealers

2014 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 085-089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evren Ok ◽  
Huseyin Ertas ◽  
Gokhan Saygili ◽  
Tuba Gok
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 5 ◽  
Root Canal Sealers ◽  
Push Out

ABSTRACT Introduction: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bond strength of Photo-Activated Disinfection (PAD) system to dentin with different root canal sealers by using a push-out test design. Materials and Methods: A total of 30 extracted mandibular premolar teeth with single and straight roots were used. The crowns were removed and the root canals were prepared by using ProTaper rotary files. The smear layer was removed and the roots were randomly divided into two groups (n = 15) according to the use of PAD system as the final disinfecting agent. Each group was then divided into 6 (n = 5) subgroups and obturated with gutta-percha and 3 different root canal sealers. The groups were Group 1: Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) + ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)-AH Plus sealer; Group 2: NaOCl + EDTA + PAD-AH Plus; Group 3: NaOCl + EDTA-Sealapex; Group 4: NaOCl + EDTA + PAD-Sealapex; Group 5: NaOCl + EDTA-mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)-Fiallapex; and Group 6: NaOCl + EDTA + PAD-MTA-Fillapex. 1-mm thickness horizontal sections (n: 5 × 4 = 20) were sliced for the push-out bond strength measurement. Results: Group 3 and 4 showed significantly lower bond strengths compared with all the other groups (P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found among Groups 1, 2 and 5, but there was statistically significant difference between Group 5 and 6 (P < 0.05). Conclusion: This in vitro study indicated that the PAD system adversely affected the bond strength of the MTA Fillapex root canal sealer.

scholarly journals Effect of nonthermal atmospheric plasma on the push-out bond strength of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic root canal sealers: An in vitro study

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Roopadevi Garlapati ◽  
KolluriMohana Chandra ◽  
PraveenKumar Gali ◽  
Bolla Nagesh ◽  
Sayesh Vemuri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Epoxy Resin ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Atmospheric Plasma ◽  
Root Canal Sealers ◽  
Push Out

scholarly journals Micro-push-out bond strength of Mineral—based root canal sealer in canals with different tapers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Nunna Vasavi ◽  
◽  
Kantheti Sirisha ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Root Canal Sealer ◽  
Rotary Instruments ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Push Out

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the micro-push-out bond strength of a mineral-based root canal sealer, BioRoot RCS in canals prepared by K3XF rotary systems of two different tapers. Material and Methods: Eighty caries free maxillary central incisors were used in this study. The samples were allocated into 4 groups (n=20) according to the root canal sealer and taper of the rotary instruments. The samples were obturated using single cone obturation technique. From each root 1mm thick slices at coronal, middle and apical thirds were collected using hard tissue microtome under continuous water coolant. Push-out tests were done for these sections using a Universal testing machine (INSTRON 8801) at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the bond strengths within groups and Tukey’s multiple post hoc analysis was used for pair-wise comparison of bond strengths. Results: AH Plus exhibited higher micro-push-out bond strength than BioRootRCS though they did not differ significantly (p>0.05). Preparation of root canals with 6% taper rotary instruments showed higher bond strength than 4% though they did not differ significantly (p>0.05). Conclusion: There was no significant difference between micro-push-out bond strength values of BioRoot RCS and AH Plus. The bond strength values were high in 6% taper canals than 4% canals though the difference was not significant statistically.

scholarly journals The effect of Erbium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet laser irradiation on push-out bond strength of endodontic sealers with root canal dentin: An in vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength and failure modes

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 2-8
Author(s):  
J. Sandeep Reddy ◽  
K. B. Jayalakshmi ◽  
I. Sujatha ◽  
Prasannalatha Nadig ◽  
Nilima Salim Isani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Yttrium Aluminum Garnet ◽  
Er:Yag Laser ◽  
Group I ◽  
Erbium Doped ◽  
Yttrium Aluminum ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Push Out

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the push-out bond strength of bioceramic sealer and resin-based sealer on Erbium-doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Er:YAG) treated root canals. Material and Methods: Sixty single-rooted teeth were collected, decoronated apical to the cementoenamel junction, maintaining the minimum root length of 14 mm. Samples were instrumented with WaveOne Gold primary file and divided into two experimental groups (n = 30), based on laser irradiation: Group I: No laser and Group II: Er:YAG laser irradiated. Groups I and II were again divided into two subgroups “a” (AH Plus) and “b” (mineral trioxide aggregate [MTA] Fillapex) with 15 samples in each group. As per the grouping, sealers were coated onto the canal walls and obturated. After 24 h of storage in 100% humidity at 37°C, all the samples were sectioned transversely and push-out test was performed using universal testing machine. Stereomicroscope was used to determine the mode of failure. A one-way analysis of variance was employed to compare the mean POBS. Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk parametric tests were done to check the normality. The Games-Howell multiple post hoc test was used for pairwise comparison of the groups at a 95% confidence level. Results: Both AH Plus and MTA Fillapex exhibited higher bond strength in the laser-treated canals. AH plus exhibited superior bond strength compared to MTA Fillapex in both laser and non-laser-treated groups (P < 0.05). AH Plus groups have predominantly presented cohesive failure whereas MTA Fillapex presented mixed failures. Conclusion: Irradiation with Er:YAG laser in the root canal before obturation improves the bond strength significantly. The adhesive properties of MTA Fillapex are comparable to that of AH Plus.

Effect of ultrasonic and sonic activation of root canal sealers on the push-out bond strength and interfacial adaptation to root canal dentine

2017 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. E. B. Wiesse ◽  
Y. T. Silva-Sousa ◽  
R. D. Pereira ◽  
C. Estrela ◽  
L. M. Domingues ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Sonic Activation ◽  
Root Canal Sealers ◽  
Push Out

scholarly journals Adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus sealers to human root dentin treated with different solutions

2008 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinicius Humberto Nunes ◽  
Ricardo Gariba Silva ◽  
Edson Alfredo ◽  
Manoel D. Sousa-Neto ◽  
Yara T. C. Silva-Sousa
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Water Control ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Root Dentin ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Endodontic Sealers ◽  
Push Out

This study evaluated comparatively the adhesion of Epiphany and AH Plus endodontic sealers to human root dentin treated with 1% NaOCl and 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA, using the push-out test. Sixty root cylinders obtained from maxillary canines had the canals prepared and were randomly assigned to 3 groups (n=20), according to root dentin treatment: GI - distilled water (control), GII - 1% NaOCl and GIII - 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA. Each group was divided into 2 subgroups (n=10) filled with either Epiphany or AH Plus. Bond strength push-out test data (kN) were obtained and analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test. There was statistically significant difference between sealers (AH Plus: 0.78 ± 0.13; Epiphany: 0.61 ± 0.19; p<0.01) and among root dentin treatments (distilled water: 0.58 ± 0.19; 1% NaOCl: 0.71 ± 0.12; 1% NaOCl+17% EDTA: 0.80 ± 0.17; p<0.05). In conclusion, AH Plus sealer presented greater adhesion to dentin than Epiphany, regardless of the treatment of root canal walls.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document