scholarly journals Project-based learning approach for control system courses

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liliana Fernández-Samacá ◽  
José Miguel Ramírez ◽  
Martha L. Orozco-Gutiérrez
Keyword(s):  
Control System ◽  
Student Performance ◽  
Student Evaluation ◽  
Survey Design ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Traditional Education ◽  
Project Based Learning ◽  
Problem Definition ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
The Impact

This paper introduces the design and development of control system courses in an undergraduate program by using Project-Based Learning (PBL) when the curriculum uses Traditional Education. The paper presents a complete outline of control courses that takes into account the problem definition, project duration, support resources and student evaluation. In this approach, students are organized into teams to develop a project seeking to find the solution to a control problem. The approach is devoted to placing a professional challenge into the course, so students learn the topics while they solve the problem, and develop the transversal skills needed to face the new challenges of control. The approach uses the peer-assessment and self-assessment activities to evaluate abilities, knowledge, and observe the development of transversal skills. The impact of the proposed approach is evaluated by using a survey and observing the student performance. Aspects about the survey design and survey results are presented analyzing the contribution of the proposed approach to develop skills like teamwork, self-learning, problem solving and communication abilities.

Rater variation in pragmatic assessment: The impact of the linguistic background on peer-assessment and self-assessment

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-85
Author(s):  
Sunni L. Sonnenburg-Winkler ◽  
Zohreh R. Eslami ◽  
Ali Derakhshan
Keyword(s):  
English Language Learners ◽  
Speech Acts ◽  
English Language ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Native Languages ◽  
Social Rules ◽  
Language Background ◽  
The Impact

AbstractThe present study investigates variability among raters from different linguistic backgrounds, who evaluated the pragmatic performance of English language learners with varying native languages (L1s) by using both self- and peer-assessments. To this end, written discourse completion task (WDCT) samples of requesting speech acts from 10 participants were collected. Thereafter, the participants were asked to assess their peers’ WDCTs before assessing their own samples using the same rating scale. The raters were further asked to provide an explanation for their rating decisions. Findings indicate that there may indeed be a link between a rater’s language background and their scoring patterns, although the results regarding peer- and self-assessment are mixed. There are both similarities and differences in the participants’ use of pragmatic norms and social rules in evaluating appropriateness.

scholarly journals Impact of Formative Assessment Practices on Student Motivation for Learning the English Language

2022 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-41
Author(s):  
Anita Muho ◽  
Gentjana Taraj
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Formative Assessment ◽  
Student Motivation ◽  
English Language ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Assessment Practices ◽  
School Students ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Motivation For Learning ◽  
The Impact

This study aimed at exploring the impact of formative assessment practices on student motivation for learning the English language. As Leahy, Lyon, Thompson, and Wiliam (2005) stated, education needs to change its function from collecting the results of right or wrong, and to encourage teachers in gathering information that will affect the educational decisions. This study is a non-experimental, correlational study, to describe the relationship between formative assessment practices and motivation for leaning. The instrument used was a questionnaire on high school students from public and private schools, who were selected randomly by stratified sampling. They belonged to three major high schools of Durres, Albania. The findings of this study showed that factors like strategic questions used by the teacher during formative assessment, student’s portfolio, self-assessment, and peer assessment affected positively the motivation for learning the English language. The results of the regression equation revealed that from four independent variables, the factor that had the greatest impact on motivation for learning were strategic questions used by the teacher during formative assessment, followed by self-assessment, peer assessment and student’s portfolio. This study identified ways of intervention to promote motivation for learning the English language. The study will contribute in the Albanian context showing how assessment practices made an impact on student motivation. It will help educational institutions and policy makers, foreign language teachers in improving the assessment practices to promote student motivation in learning the English language.

scholarly journals Pursue today and assess tomorrow - how students’ subjective perceptions influence their preference for self- and peer assessments

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meskuere Capan Melser ◽  
Stefan Lettner ◽  
Andjela Bäwert ◽  
Claudia Puttinger ◽  
Anita Holzinger
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Undergraduate Medical Students ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Negative Attitudes ◽  
Subjective Perceptions ◽  
Passive Learning ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Alternative assessments engage students in the assessment process to improve both short- and long-term outcomes by developing their judgments and responsibility about their own learning, and that of their peers. In this study, we investigated students’ perception towards self- and peer-assessment, their objectivity and impact on students’ learning. Methods The study was conducted at the Medical University of Vienna. Attitudes of second year undergraduate medical students towards self- and peer-assessment, and their objectivity, appropriateness, and the impact of these assessments on students’ learning activities, was inquired using a self-developed questionnaire. Results 423 students participated in this study. Self-assessment was found more appropriate method to assess students’ knowledge. Most of students agreed that peer-assessment is not objective (M= -0.07). Majority of students evaluated that peer assessment has no or little impact on their active and passive learning (M= -0.23, -0.35), on the other hand self-assessment was reported as a helpful tool for gaining long-term knowledge (M= 0.13) and following the content of courses (M= 0.16). Conclusion Based on our results, students’ perspective on peer assessment were negative, on the whole, students had positive attitudes towards self-assessment and negative attitudes towards peer-assessment. This study also determined that self-assessment leads to the promotion of students’ learning.

scholarly journals The Impact of Writing Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment on Iranian EFL Learners’ Autonomy and Metacognitive Awareness

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Maryam Ebrahimi ◽  
Siros Izadpanah ◽  
Ehsan Namaziandost
Keyword(s):  
Language Learners ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Language Teachers ◽  
Metacognitive Awareness ◽  
Placement Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Efl Learners ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Metacognitive Awareness Inventory

One of the most significant current discussions in writing is self-assessment and peer assessment. This study aimed to investigate the impact of writing self-assessment and peer assessment on autonomy and metacognitive awareness of Iranian EFL learners. One hundred and twenty participants were selected using convenience sampling. Four instruments were used in this test: (1) Nelson placement test; (2) Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI); (3) Zhang and Li’s autonomy questionnaire; and (4) rubric. A quasiexperimental design was used in this study. They were divided into two experimental groups, self-assessment (N = 40) and peer assessment (N = 40), and one control group (N = 40). Collected data were tested and compared using covariance analysis (ANCOVA). Results from the tests indicated that both self-assessment and peer assessment are effective ways to improve autonomy and metacognition awareness of EFL learners in the completion of writing tasks. Findings also showed that self-assessment was more effective than peer assessment and the results showed that the types of assessments increased the learners’ knowledge in the writing, teaching, lexicography, spelling, grammar, and similar models and were significantly effective in developing their writing skills. The findings of the present research study might have some implications for researchers, instructors, language teachers, and language learners.

scholarly journals Strategies for Student Evaluation in The Online Context

2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 79
Author(s):  
S.-M. Avram
Keyword(s):  
Online Education ◽  
Student Performance ◽  
Student Evaluation ◽  
Formal Concept ◽  
Performance Guarantees ◽  
Final Exams ◽  
E Learning ◽  
Online Setting ◽  
Performance Results ◽  
The Impact

In this paper we conducted an investigation on the performance of the students during the second semester of the academic year 2020-2021. We looked at the performance results obtained by students on the laboratory work, practical and final exams while we were forced by the Covid pandemic to move entirely into an online education system. Our focus was to determine the impact of a consistent behaviour (or lack of it) on the final student performance. We determined that, even in an online setting, a good involvement (in terms of attendance and good performance) guarantees good final results. The investigations were performed using the Formal Concept Analysis, which is a very powerful instrument already used by us in previous research in order to detect student behaviour in using an e-learning portal. Another set of results showed that the change of the final mark computation formula to be based in a higher proportion on the lab work was closer to the actual overall performance of students

scholarly journals The Impact of Self-assessment and Peer-assessment in Writing on the Self-regulated Learning of Iranian EFL Students

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Jalil Fathi ◽  
Leila Mohammad Yousefi ◽  
Mehrnoosh Sedighravesh
Keyword(s):  
Alternative Assessment ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
The Self ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Regulated Learning ◽  
Efl Students ◽  
The Impact

Like other types of assessment subscribing to edumetrics as a reaction against traditional psychometrics paradigm, self-assessment and peer-assessment have enjoyed much popularity among various types of alternative assessment. Additionally, alternative assessments, especially self- and peer-assessments have been the focal point of departure as far as L2 writing has been concerned. Furthermore, self-regulation as a burgeoning area of research in L2 learning refers to the degree to which language learners can regulate aspects of their thinking, motivation and behavior during learning. Given the significance of both assessment and self-regulated learning in ELT, the present paper investigated the effect of the implementation of self-assessment and peer-assessment in a writing course on the self-regulated learning of a sample of Iranian EFL students. In so doing, sixty three English major Iranian students who were the students of three intact classes at Islamic Azad University participated in this study. One of the classes was regarded as the self-assessment group, the other group was assigned to peer-assessment group and the third class served as the control group of the study. The ANCOVA analyses of the self-regulation scale scores for the control and experimental groups revealed that both self-assessment and peer-assessment practices had a positive impact on the self-regulated learning of the participants. The results will have theoretical and pedagogical implications for Iranian English language education.

scholarly journals Observed Quality of Formative Peer and Self-Assessment in Everyday Mathematics Teaching and its Effects on Student Performance

2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 663-680
Author(s):  
Sandra Zulliger ◽  
Alois Buholzer ◽  
Merle Ruelmann
Keyword(s):  
Student Performance ◽  
Mathematics Teaching ◽  
Performance Test ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Real Life ◽  
General Effect ◽  
Everyday Mathematics ◽  
Self Assessment

<p style="text-align: justify;">The positive effect of peer assessment and self-assessment strategies on learners' performance has been widely confirmed in experimental or quasi-experimental studies. However, whether peer and self-assessment within everyday mathematics teaching affect student learning and achievement, has rarely been studied. This study aimed to determine with what quality peer and self-assessment occur in everyday mathematics instruction and whether and which students benefit from it in terms of achievement and the learning process. Two lessons on division were video-recorded and rated to determine the quality of peer and self-assessment. Six hundred thirty-four students of fourth-grade primary school classes in German-speaking Switzerland participated in the study and completed a performance test on division. Multilevel analyses showed no general effect of the quality of peer or self-assessment on performance. However, high-quality self-assessment was beneficial for lower-performing students, who used a larger repertoire of calculation strategies, which helped them perform better. In conclusion, peer and self-assessment in real-life settings only have a small effect on the student performance in this Swiss study.</p>

scholarly journals Developing students’ soft skills in the context of teaching foreign languages at higher education institutions

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Classroom Management ◽  
Soft Skills ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Methodological Issue ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Project Based Learning ◽  
Foreign Languages ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Grouping Students

The article deals with the methodological issue of building soft skills in the context of teaching modern foreign languages to students of higher institutions. The analysis of the available scientific and methodological research works devoted to the problem of developing students’ soft skills, especially in the process of teaching foreign languages, reveals that even though soft skills are crucial for securing employment of graduates they are still underdeveloped in the system of higher education, which results in a growing need for institutions of higher education to address the defined gap. The paper suggests some ways capable of bridging the gap and fostering the development of personal and interpersonal XXI century skills in the process of teaching foreign languages. It focuses on intra-curricular approaches to classroom management (e.g., pairing or grouping students) and methods and content of classroom activities (case study, debates, discussions, project-based learning, etc.), which have the potential to equip students with the core skills through real-life scenarios and different learning experiences. The author emphasizes that speaking and listening activities, being undoubtedly highly beneficial for soft skills development, are not the only ones that can be used to enhance learners’ soft skills. Students’ soft skills can be significantly improved while reading or writing, so the key point is to organically integrate diverse activities and teaching strategies. Therefore, before planning a class, teachers have to understand how soft skills are developed, choose what soft skills they want their students to learn, and select corresponding instructional methods and tools to model a situation in which soft skills could be naturally acquired. Particular emphasis is also placed on the question of how and what soft skills can be developed during self-assessment or peer-assessment practices. The article finishes with a few recommendations regarding possible aspects of further research.

scholarly journals Pursue today and assess tomorrow - how students’ subjective perceptions influence their preference for self- and peer assessments

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meskuere Capan Melser ◽  
Stefan Lettner ◽  
Andjela Bäwert ◽  
Claudia Puttinger ◽  
Anita Holzinger
Keyword(s):  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Undergraduate Medical Students ◽  
Self Assessment ◽  
Negative Attitudes ◽  
Subjective Perceptions ◽  
Passive Learning ◽  
Positive Attitudes ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Alternative assessments engage students in the assessment process to improve both short- and long-term outcomes by developing their judgments and responsibility about their own learning, and that of their peers. In this study, we investigated students’ perception towards self- and peer-assessment, their objectivity and impact on students’ learning. Methods: The study was conducted at the Medical University of Vienna. Attitudes of second year undergraduate medical students towards self- and peer-assessment, and their objectivity, appropriateness, and the impact of these assessments on students’ learning activities, was inquired using a self-developed questionnaire. Results: 423 students participated in this study. Self-assessment was found more appropriate method to assess students’ knowledge. Most of students agreed that peer-assessment is not objective (M= -0.07). Majority of students evaluated that peer assessment has no or little impact on their active and passive learning (M= -0.23, -0.35), on the other hand self-assessment was reported as a helpful tool for gaining long-term knowledge (M= 0.13) and following the content of courses (M= 0.16). Conclusion: Based on our results, students’ perspective on peer assessment were negative, on the whole, students had positive attitudes towards self-assessment and negative attitudes towards peer-assessment. This study also determined that self-assessment leads to the promotion of students’ learning.

scholarly journals Supporting peer assessment of individual contributions in groupwork

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Raban ◽  
Andrew Litchfield
Keyword(s):  
Student Evaluation ◽  
Peer Assessment ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Online Tool ◽  
Support Tool ◽  
Support Strategies ◽  
Individual Contributions ◽  
Evaluation Feedback ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Substantial Change

<span>The ability to assess the work of others is a core attribute for most professionals. To develop this graduate attribute in our students requires the learning of self and peer evaluation, feedback, and review skills. This paper discusses the changing design of peer assessment and the impact of a new groupwork support tool within a capstone undergraduate subject with large student numbers - Systems Development Project - in the Faculty of Information Technology at UTS. Since 1998 by implementing different support strategies for peer assessment of individual contributions the distribution of the students marks has markedly widened, and now more reflect the reality of differing team member contributions. This substantial change has occurred with the use of an online tool which supports the development of student evaluation, feedback and review skills when peer assessing individual contributions to large group projects. In use since 2004 the groupwork support tool is called Team Contribution Tracking (TeCTra).</span>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document