scholarly journals A Gastropod Scavenger Serving as Paratenic Host for Larval Helminth Communities in Shore Crabs

2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 862-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. D M. Latham ◽  
B. L. Fredensborg ◽  
L. H. McFarland ◽  
R. Poulin
1986 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
D R Joel ◽  
P J Sanjeeva Raj ◽  
R Raghavan
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 445 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. R. Smales ◽  
T. H. Cribb

The helminth fauna from 124 water-rats, Hydromys chrysogaster, collected from 33 localities in Queensland was analysed. A total of 45 species of helminths was found, comprising 2 acanthocephalans, 2 cestodes, 13 nematodes and 28 trematodes. The helminth community of the water-rats in the region north of latitude 18˚ (far north) was different from that of water-rats south of 18˚ (central); Sorensen’s Index 45·8% similarity, whereas Holmes and Podesta’s Index gave 32·1% similarity. Comparisons with data from water-rats from southern and Tasmanian regions showed that they were different from each other and from both Queensland regions. The helminth communities were characterised by high diversity, dominated by trematodes in the central and Tasmanian regions, but with nematodes becoming more prominent in the far northern and southern regions. No core or secondary species were found in the Queensland helminth communities, the southern community was suggestive of a bimodal distribution and the Tasmanian had two core species. A checklist of helminth species occurring in water-rats from eastern Australia is provided.


2013 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew A. Wale ◽  
Stephen D. Simpson ◽  
Andrew N. Radford

1971 ◽  
Vol 55 (3) ◽  
pp. 813-832
Author(s):  
B. M. H. BUSH ◽  
ALAN ROBERTS

1. Intracellular and extracellular recordings from the two large-diameter S and T sensory fibres of the posterior thoracico-coxal muscle receptor in shore crabs confirm the graded, dynamic-static nature of the receptor potentials evoked by stretching the receptor muscle, and the lack of afferent impulses. 2. Slow ramp-function stretches evoke receptor potentials with characteristic shapes, which differ between the two fibres in several respects: (i) The dynamic component in the S fibre resembles an algebraic sum of length and velocity responses and a variable initial ‘acceleration’ (?) transient, while in the T fibre it commonly declines (‘adapts’) during stretching, especially at greater velocities and starting lengths. (ii) On release of stretch the S fibre usually exhibits a ‘negative velocity response’, but the T fibre repolarizes rapidly often with a slight hyperpolarization. (iii) The dynamic response of the T fibre is generally greater than that of the S fibre, and increases more steeply and approximately logarithmically with stretch velocity over a 10- to 50-fold range. (iv) The ‘static response’ or degree of depolarization increases fairly linearly with receptor length in the S fibre but very non-linearly in the T fibre. (v) The T fibre displays pronounced hysteresis in its dynamic and static responses at increasing and decreasing lengths, but the S fibre shows little hysteresis. (vi) The T fibre but not the S fibre commonly shows small rapid oscillations or ‘noise’ superimposed upon strongly depolarized ‘static’ potentials. (vii) The S and T responses may be affected reciprocally by some forms of receptor muscle contraction. 3. Graded receptor potentials evoked in the ‘D’ fibre by stretching the non-muscular depressor-receptor strand of the coxo-basal joint show little hysteresis. 4. Receptor muscle fibres respond to motor nerve stimulation or spontaneous motor impulses from the thoracic ganglion with slow, facilitating and summating excitatory junctional potentials. 5. The mechanisms underlying the differences between S and T responses, and their functional significance to the animal, are discussed, and comparisons are drawn with other muscle receptors.


2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (13) ◽  
pp. 1061-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen E. Greiman ◽  
Joseph A. Cook ◽  
Vasyl V. Tkach ◽  
Eric P. Hoberg ◽  
Damian M. Menning ◽  
...  

1905 ◽  
Vol 2 (7) ◽  
pp. 305-310
Author(s):  
Henry Woodward

Having been desired by my friend Miss Caroline Birley to examine two Crustaceans in nodules from the Mekran Coast— part of a much larger series, mostly enclosing fossil shells, described by Mr. R. B. Newton, F.G.S. (see ante, pp. 293–303)—I gladly comply with the request to add a note thereon to his paper.The first concretion, when broken open, displays the dorsal aspect in impression and counterpart of a small crab, 5½ cm. broad by 3 cm. deep, having one long, slender, forcipated chela, imperfectly preserved, measuring nearly 5 cm. in length; and part of one of the fifth posterior pair of feet, adapted for swimming, showing it to have been near to the family Portunidæ, to which our common shore-crabs of the genus Portunus belong. None of these, however, can be satisfactorily compared with the fossil crab from Ormara, which is certainly referable to another genus.


2013 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Yudi Fujimoto ◽  
Edilene Santos Almeida ◽  
Daniel Guerreiro Diniz ◽  
Jorge Costa Eiras ◽  
Mauricio Laterça Martins

The objective of this work was to report the first seasonal occurrence of the acanthocephalan Quadrigyrus nickoliSchmidt & Hugghins, 1973(Quadrigyridae), in the “Mato Grosso”Hyphessobrycon eques (Characidae) (Steindachner, 1882), collected from the Chumucuí River, state of Pará, Brazil. The fish were collected between July 2006 (rainy season) and June 2007 (dry season) and were examined for parasites using pattern techniques. A total of 75 parasites were found in the stomach and intestine. Among 83 fish examined (50 in the dry season and 33 in the rainy season), 22 were parasitized by cystacanths of Q. nickoli. The importance of H. eques as a paratenic host for Q. nickoli is discussed. This is the first study on the biology of and infection by Q. nickoli occurring in the eastern Amazon region.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document