Luteinizing hormone responses to repeated injections of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone in the rat during the oestrous cycle and after ovariectomy with or without oestrogen treatment

1982 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Higuchi ◽  
Masazumi Kawakami

In order to characterize the nature of the LH response to exogenous LH releasing hormone (LH-RH) in female rats during the oestrous cycle and after ovariectomy with or without oestrogen treatment, serum LH levels were determined after repeated LH-RH injections (300 ng/kg body wt, six times with 30-min intervals). The LH response to the first LH-RH stimulation was greatest on the days of pro-oestrus and oestrus followed by dioestrus 2 and dioestrus 1. Second and subsequent LH-RH challenges enhanced the LH response only on pro-oestrus and dioestrus 2. Larger doses of LH-RH (3 μg/kg body wt) induced a small self-priming effect on dioestrus 1 and oestrus. The LH response to the first LH-RH administration increased with time up to 30 days after ovariectomy and then reached a plateau. A small self-priming effect was present in rats ovariectomized for 30 and 60 days, but absent in rats ovariectomized for 5, 10 and 120 days. Oestrogen treatment increased the self-priming effect in rats ovariectomized for 5 days, with little sensitization of the pituitary gland to the first LH-RH injection on the next day. In rats ovariectomized for 120 days, oestrogen treatment enhanced responsiveness to the first and successive LH-RH stimulations on the next day, and further enhancement to the first response only was induced 3 days after oestrogen treatment.

1975 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. JOHNSON ◽  
R. S. MALLAMPATI

SUMMARY Release of immunoreactive LH and FSH was induced in immature intact female rats by repeated injections of synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH). Altering the dose of LH-RH (5, 10, 20, 50 ng) and the frequency of administration (every 10, 20, 30 or 60 min) over a period of 2 h produced a variety of serum LH and FSH concentrations and ratios. When the dose was a constant 20 ng but the frequency of injections was either 20 or 30 min, a steady state in serum gonadotrophin concentrations was reached within 1 h and the level remained the same during the second hour. When given every 10 min, 20 ng LH-RH produced a much higher concentration of both LH and FSH during the second hour of stimulation. Examination of the gonadotrophin levels after each injection of LH-RH showed that the pituitary response was variable in spite of a constant stimulus.


1981 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. M. CONVEY ◽  
J. S. KESNER ◽  
V. PADMANABHAN ◽  
T. D. CARRUTHERS ◽  
T. W. BECK

In ovariectomized heifers, oestradiol decreases concentrations of LH in serum for approximately 12 h after which LH is released in a surge comparable in size and duration to the preovulatory surge. Using this model, we measured LH release induced by LH releasing hormone (LH-RH) from pituitary explants taken from ovariectomized heifers before or after an oestradiol-induced LH surge. These changes were related to changes in LH concentrations in serum and pituitary glands and hypothalamic LH-RH content. Twenty Holstein heifers were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups to be killed 0, 6, 12, or 24 h after the injection of 500 μg oestradiol-17β. Jugular blood was collected at −2, −1 and 0 h then at intervals of 2 h until slaughter. Pituitary glands were collected and ≃2 mm3 explants were exposed to 4 ng LH-RH/ml medium for 30 min (superfusion) or 4 ng LH-RH/ml medium for 2 h in Erlenmeyer flasks. Levels of LH were measured in the medium. Hypothalami, collected at autopsy, were assayed for LH-RH content. To determine pituitary LH content, an additional 15 ovariectomized heifers were killed, five each at 0, 12 and 24 h after the injection of 500 μg oestradiol. In both groups of heifers, oestradiol reduced serum LH concentrations to ≃ 1 ng/ml, a level which persisted for 12 h, when LH was released in a surge. Pituitary sensitivity to LH-RH was increased at 6 and 12 h after the injection of oestradiol, but was markedly decreased at 24 h, i.e. after the LH surge. Despite this twofold increase in capacity of the pituitary gland to release LH in response to LH-RH, pituitary LH content did not change during 12 h after oestradiol treatment. However, LH content decreased after the LH surge and this decrease was associated with a decrease in pituitary responsiveness to LH-RH. Hypothalamic LH-RH content was not altered by these treatments. We have interpreted our results as evidence that oestradiol exerts a positive feedback effect on the pituitary gland of ovariectomized heifers such that pituitary sensitivity to LH-RH is increased twofold by the time the LH surge is initiated. In addition, oestradiol causes a transitory inhibition of LH-RH release as shown by the fact that serum LH concentrations remained low during the interval from injection of oestradiol until the beginning of the LH surge despite the fact that pituitary sensitivity to LH-RH is increased at this time. Depletion of a readily releasable pool of pituitary LH may be the mechanism by which the LH surge is terminated.


1974 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 431-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Morishita ◽  
H. Mitani ◽  
Y. Masuda ◽  
K. Higuchi ◽  
M. Tomioka ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The effect of synthetic luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) on ovulation has been studied during the oestrous cycle in adult female rats. Ovulation could be induced by the administration of 1 μg synthetic LH-RH at 1:00 a. m. on the day of dioestrus II (lights on from 10:00 p.m. to 10:00 a.m.). At 1:00 a.m. on the day of dioestrus II, the average volume of the largest follicles reached a volume of 83 × 106 μm3 and was three fifth of the volume of that at 6:00 a. m. on the day of pro-oestrus (critical period). These findings suggest that the luteinizing hormone (LH) content in the pituitary gland during the early period of dioestrus II is sufficient to induce ovulation and that the follicles that reach to three fifth of the volume at the critical period are capable of ovulating providing endogenous ovulatory LH released.


1982 ◽  
Vol 242 (6) ◽  
pp. E392-E397
Author(s):  
L. K. Tang ◽  
A. C. Martellock ◽  
J. K. Horiuchi

The relationship between 17 beta-estradiol (E2) stimulation of luteinizing hormone (LH) response to LH-releasing hormone (LHRH) and E2 effect on LHRH binding was examined in pituitary monolayer cultures prepared from female rats. E2 pretreatment significantly (P less than 0.05) augmented the LHRH-induced LH release to 158-180% of the non-E2-treated controls. The maximal E2-priming effect could be observed after 1 day of treatment. E2 treatment for 3 days stimulated [D-Ala6]luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRHa) binding to about 1.5-fold that of the non-E2-treated controls without affecting the dissociation constant of LHRH receptor (Kd = 4 X 10(-10) M). The stimulatory effect of E2 on cell proliferation as determined by [3H]thymidine incorporation was also observed 3 days after treatment. However, E2 stimulation of LH accumulation in the cultured cells could be detected as early as 4 h after treatment. These results indicate that E2-priming effect on pituitary LH response to LHRH is initially associated with an increase in cellular LH content and later associated with increases in LHRH binding and in an index of cell proliferation that may include the LH-producing cells.


1981 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 329-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. DE KONING ◽  
J. A. M. J. VAN DIETEN ◽  
A. M. I. TIJSSEN ◽  
G. P. VAN REES

The involvement of cyclic AMP in the action of LH releasing hormone (LH-RH) on LH secretion was studied by incubating pituitary glands from adult female rats on day 2 of dioestrus with 1 mm-N6-monobutyryl cyclic AMP (mbcAMP) and 10 mm-theophylline for periods of up to 10 h. This treatment induced a pattern of LH release similar to that observed in the presence of a low concentration of LH-RH (0·1 ng LH-RH/ml), i.e. an initial 4 h period during which the release of LH was minimal was followed subsequently by an increased rate of release. In this system inhibition of protein synthesis by cycloheximide (25 μg/ml) did not impair the initial response of the pituitary tissue but the increase in the rate of LH release during the second phase of the response was blocked. Preincubation with mbcAMP and theophylline increased the responsiveness of the pituitary tissue to LH-RH. This action could be prevented by including cycloheximide during the preincubation period, whereas addition of this drug during the incubation with LH-RH no longer impaired the increased responsiveness. The size of the sensitizing action of mbcAMP and theophylline mediated through the induction of protein synthesis was comparable with that of a high concentration of LH-RH. From the absence of a significant change in total LH during the preincubation period, it was concluded that the increased responsiveness was not the result of newly synthesized LH. The present results suggest a role or roles for cyclic AMP in the secretion of LH induced by LH-RH. Besides an effect on the formation of a factor related to the synthesis of protein, other than LH which has a permissive role in the acute release of LH, cyclic AMP might also be concerned in the secretion process through a pathway which does not involve synthesis of protein.


1982 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Fink ◽  
W. J. Sheward ◽  
H. M. Charlton

We have investigated the LH response to LH releasing hormone (LH-RH) in female hypogonadal (hpg) mice in which the hypothalamus contains no LH-RH and the pituitary gland contains significantly less LH than in normal mice. Both the releasing action and the priming effect of LH-RH were not significantly different in hpg compared with normal mice. Raised plasma concentrations of oestradiol-17β reduced pituitary responsiveness to LH-RH in normal but not in hpg mice. These results show that in the mouse neither longterm exposure to normal levels of LH-RH nor a normal pituitary content of LH are necessary for either the releasing or the priming action of LH-RH.


1981 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. MEIDAN ◽  
G. FINK ◽  
Y. KOCH

The ontogeny of the facilitatory effect of oestradiol and luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) on the responsiveness of the anterior pituitary gland to LH-RH has been studied in vitro using pituitary glands from female rats aged 15, 17, 20, 31, 35 and 38 days. The facilitatory effect of oestradiol was already well established by day 15, while the facilitatory effect of LH-RH (priming effect) developed only after day 17. Although it increased the overall response of the gland to LH-RH, oestradiol did not selectively enhance the priming effect of LH-RH. Both the effect of oestradiol and LH-RH reached a peak on day 25, 7 days before vaginal opening in this colony, and, as assessed by measuring pituitary LH contents, were not dependent upon the synthesis of LH. These data show that different mechanisms may be involved in the facilitation of pituitary responsiveness by oestradiol and LH-RH, but that both mechanisms appear to depend more upon an increase in the sensitivity of the receptor/release apparatus rather than in the gonadotrophin content of the gonadotrophs.


1981 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALISON SPEIGHT ◽  
G. FINK

Dispersed pituitary cells obtained from female rats with regular oestrous cycles were suspended in Bio-Gel columns and perfused with pulses of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH). There was a close relationship between the amount of LH released and the concentration of LH-RH in the perfusate. It was not possible to elicit the priming effect of LH-RH, but the LH-response changed markedly during the oestrous cycle in a manner similar to that seen in vivo; i.e. the responses of cells prepared from rats killed at pro-oestrus were much greater than the responses of cells prepared from rats killed on other days of the cycle. A similar change in responsiveness was obtained when the columns were perfused with 60 mmol K+/1, suggesting that at least part of the increase in pituitary responsiveness that occurs at pro-oestrus is not dependent upon changes in specific receptors for LH-RH.


1977 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pushpa S. Kalra ◽  
Satya P. Kalra

ABSTRACT Cycling female rats were sacrificed at various times during the 4-day oestrous cycle. LH-RH in the medial basal hypothalamus (MBH) and serum LH-RH, LH, oestradiol (Oe2), and progesterone were analyzed by radioimmunoassays. The MBH LH-RH content was lowest at 19.55–20.15 h during pro-oestrus but increased gradually through oestrus and dioestrus I to significantly higher values at noon of dioestrus II, and then decreased precipitously at 18.00 h. Although serum LH levels remained basal from midnight of pro-oestrus through dioestrus II, serum LH-RH levels were significantly elevated at 12.00 and 21.00 h on oestrus (vs. the midnight prooestrus levels) and declined between 15.00 and 22.00 h of dioestrus I. In conjunction with high Oe2 titres, LH-RH in the MBH and serum declined initially during pro-oestrus between 14.07–14.45 h and then increased abruptly between 14.55–15.55 h; the pre-ovulatory rise in serum LH was observed from 16.05 h onwards. LH-RH activity in the MBH and serum receded gradually to the early afternoon levels by 19.55–24.00 h while the peak in serum LH was observed at 17.05–18.05 h. These studies suggested that the hypersecretion of the MBH LH-RH (synthesis + release) may be responsible for the pre-ovulatory discharge of LH.


1982 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. MATTERI ◽  
G. P. MOBERG

During treatment with cortisol or ACTH, dairy heifers were given two doses of LH releasing hormone (LH-RH) spaced 1·5 h apart. Serum concentrations of cortisol and LH were monitored during each treatment. Treatment with both ACTH and cortisol raised plasma cortisol levels above the respective saline controls (P<0·001). Neither treatment affected basal LH concentrations. A slight depression in LH response was seen in the cortisol-treated animals after the first LH-RH injection, as shown by a statistically significant depression at three of the sample times. There was no significant difference between treated and control LH values after the second LH-RH administration. Treatment with ACTH resulted in significantly reduced LH values at all sample times after both injections of LH-RH.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document