scholarly journals Calibration of a thermal conductivity sensor for field measurement of matric suction

Géotechnique ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.C. LEONG ◽  
X.-H. ZHANG ◽  
H. RAHARDJO
1989 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Sattler ◽  
D. G. Fredlund

The measurement of soil suction is pivotal to the application of soil mechanics principles in geotechnical engineering practice related to unsaturated soils. Volume change, shear strength, and seepage analyses all require an understanding of the matric suction in the soil. This note summarizes the use of thermal conductivity sensors to measure matric suction in the laboratory. The thermal conductivity sensor is described along with its mode of operation. A brief description is given of the procedure for calibrating thermal conductivity sensors using a pressure plate apparatus. The measurement of matric suction can be performed in the laboratory on Shelby tube samples. The laboratory measurements of matric suction can be adjusted for the effect of overburden pressure in the field. The required equilibration time for suction measurements is discussed along with details of the test procedure. The applications of the measured suction values to design are briefly discussed.Key words: matric suction, negative pore-water pressure, thermal conductivity sensor, laboratory, undisturbed samples.


2003 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 587-597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Nichol ◽  
Leslie Smith ◽  
Roger Beckie

Thermal conductivity (TC) sensors, which provide estimates of matric suction, were used in a field experiment designed to characterize unsaturated water movement through coarse mine waste rock at a mine site in northern Saskatchewan. Two years of monitoring data were used to evaluate long-term TC sensor performance and accuracy. Thermal conductivity sensor output requires corrections of sensor hysteresis and changes in ambient temperature. A correction method for ambient temperature is derived. A comparison of the uncorrected field measurements with the values corrected for both hysteresis and ambient temperature indicates that the magnitude of these corrections can be similar. Corrected TC sensor measurements are compared to measurements of matric suction made using tensiometers. Thermal conductivity sensor response to the initial arrival of a wetting front lagged 1–3 days behind the tensiometer measurements. The TC sensor data tended to overestimate matric suction in the waste rock, when compared to the tensiometer data. Long-term drift in the TC sensors located at depths of 50 cm and below (where the sensors have been continuously exposed to matric suctions less than 20 kPa) has lead to data that are not interpretable using the calibration curves derived prior to sensor emplacement in the waste rock pile.Key words: matric suction, thermal conductivity sensor, hysteresis, temperature.


Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 2191
Author(s):  
Hongquan Zhang ◽  
Bin Shen ◽  
Wenbin Hu ◽  
Xinlei Liu

2018 ◽  
Vol 254 ◽  
pp. 771-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Struk ◽  
Amol Shirke ◽  
Alireza Mahdavifar ◽  
Peter J. Hesketh ◽  
Joseph R. Stetter

2004 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pascal Tardy ◽  
Jean-René Coulon ◽  
Claude Lucat ◽  
Francis Menil

2004 ◽  
pp. 125-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Fredlund ◽  
Y Perera ◽  
J Padilla

2020 ◽  
pp. 275-280
Author(s):  
D.G. Fredlund ◽  
F. Shuai ◽  
M. Feng

Geoderma ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 337 ◽  
pp. 491-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sen Lu ◽  
Yili Lu ◽  
Wei Peng ◽  
Zhaoqiang Ju ◽  
Tusheng Ren

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document