3D effects in seismic liquefaction of stochastically variable soil deposits

Author(s):  
R. Popescu ◽  
J. H. Prevost ◽  
G. Deodatis
Géotechnique ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Popescu ◽  
J. H. Prevost ◽  
G. Deodatis

2014 ◽  
Vol 1025-1026 ◽  
pp. 1035-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Pamuk ◽  
Patricia Gallagher ◽  
Korhan Adalier

This paper presents a series of centrifuge tests studying the performance of colloidal silica grouted soil layers during permanent lateral ground deformations due to earthquake induced lateral spreading. Two centrifuge tests were conducted to study liquefaction resistance of liquefiable soil deposits stabilized with colloidal silica, and then the results were compared with the tests conducted on similar soil deposits without any soil remediation. The testing results on remediated soils showed excellent resistance against the liquefaction and associated lateral and vertical ground deformations.


2007 ◽  
Vol 44 (7) ◽  
pp. 873-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmood Seid-Karbasi ◽  
Peter M Byrne

Experience from past earthquakes indicates that seismically induced large lateral spreads and flow slides in alluvial sand deposits have taken place in coastal and river areas in many parts of the world. The ground slope in these slides was often not very steep, gentler than a few percent. Recent research indicates that the presence of low-permeability silt or clay sublayers within the sand deposits is responsible for this behaviour. Such layers form a barrier to upward flow of water associated with earthquake-generated pore pressures. This causes an accumulation of pore water at the base of the layers, resulting in greatly reduced strength and possible slope instability. This paper uses an effective stress coupled stress-flow dynamic analyses procedure to demonstrate the effects of a low-permeability barrier layer on ground deformations from an earthquake event. The analyses show that an expansion zone develops at the base of barrier layers in stratified soil deposits under seismic loading which can greatly reduce shear strength and result in large deformations and flow failure. Without such a layer or layers, the slope may undergo significant displacements, but not a flow slide. Slopes with a barrier layer can be stabilized by drains.Key words: liquefaction, lateral spreads, stratification, flow failure, dynamic analysis, UBCSAND model, drain.


Author(s):  
Richard D. Weir ◽  
Trevor A. Kinley ◽  
Richard W. Klafki ◽  
Clayton D. Apps

This chapter is based on ecological information on 82 radio-tagged badgers (39 F, 43 M) among three study populations in British Columbia, Canada between 1996 and 2010, data that were collected to learn more about the ecology of badgers and consider how variation in their ecology might inform regional conservation strategies. The widely spaced, lower density prey and distribution of soil deposits suitable for digging in British Columbia likely required badgers to use substantially larger areas, relative to the core range, in which to acquire sufficient energy to survive and reproduce. Strikes from automobiles were the primary cause of death among all radio-tagged badgers and this source of mortality is pervasive throughout the limited distribution of badgers in British Columbia. Despite their potential for high fecundity, populations of badgers in British Columbia likely remain at considerable risk compared to those in the core of the species’ range.


Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1131
Author(s):  
Soonkie Nam ◽  
Marte Gutierrez ◽  
Panayiotis Diplas ◽  
John Petrie

This paper critically compares the use of laboratory tests against in situ tests combined with numerical seepage modeling to determine the hydraulic conductivity of natural soil deposits. Laboratory determination of hydraulic conductivity used the constant head permeability and oedometer tests on undisturbed Shelby tube and block soil samples. The auger hole method and Guelph permeameter tests were performed in the field. Groundwater table elevations in natural soil deposits with different hydraulic conductivity values were predicted using finite element seepage modeling and compared with field measurements to assess the various test results. Hydraulic conductivity values obtained by the auger hole method provide predictions that best match the groundwater table’s observed location at the field site. This observation indicates that hydraulic conductivity determined by the in situ test represents the actual conditions in the field better than that determined in a laboratory setting. The differences between the laboratory and in situ hydraulic conductivity values can be attributed to factors such as sample disturbance, soil anisotropy, fissures and cracks, and soil structure in addition to the conceptual and procedural differences in testing methods and effects of sample size.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document